Look into the Sony a77-features to blow away the competition! 24 mp, video, fast focus, etc., etc. and all for $1300! Also, it is weather sealed.
flashgordonbrown wrote:
dasloaf wrote:
If you go with Canon or Nikon, there are numerous lens rental companies and makes taking better pictures, cheaper. They are the big 2 and I would go with either of them before Sony.
I've been involved in photography for 50+years, and have come to be somewhat amused/bemused with the brand name issue. I currently own Sony A-850 bodies, and am completely satisfied with their performance. After all, the camera is really the 'brush' in the artist's(photographer's) hand. My reason for choosing Sony is the built-in stabilization(every lens that I own is stabilized!) and the features for the $. Also, many of the other brands use Sony imaging chips! When I was working as a retail camera salesperson, I would tell my customers that you could put all of the various brands of camera in a box, reach in without looking and you would pull out the best one. It is a matter of how a camera feels in your hand, and whether or not that brand has the accessories that you need to accomplish your goal.
quote=dasloaf If you go with Canon or Nikon, ther... (
show quote)
I agree as I own the A850, A700 and A900, these are well built cameras with allot to offer. I would not buy the Sony cheaper cameras that are plastic and made for those starting out. The plastic body cameras from Sony all have warnings about leaving them in direct sunlight or heat, as well as moisture warnings. So if you are a real enthusiast, semi-professional or professional the only 3 Sony I would recommend are what I own. As you stated they are tools in the artistÂ’s arsenal (paintbrush and canvas) and each tool is selected by the artists for his/her own preferencesÂ’. For my taste I find nothing wrong with Nikon except they are (and have always been) expensive. Canon 5D MarkII or 7D are great cameras on par with the Sony A900 including cost, however Sony high end lenses (costing $1,700 and up) are Carl Zeiss lenses and beats Canon lenses.
flashgordonbrown wrote:
Look into the Sony a77-features to blow away the competition! 24 mp, video, fast focus, etc., etc. and all for $1300! Also, it is weather sealed.
I was looking on
http://www.dpreview.com/previews/sonyslta77/ reviews of the A77 where did you find that it is weather sealed?
Yep, Bruce, Thanks for the Info and advice which I would follow if i could. But as in the ol' Simon and Garfunkel song goes "if I could I really would" get a high end that is. If i get the entry level 230, at least I have the lenses and memory to get it going. I can shoot weddings with it. From what I have read the images are very good and in some instances in testing better than Nikon 3000.
http://snapsort.com/compare/Nikon_D3000-vs-Sony_Alpha_DSLR-A230Regarding water problems: I can fabricate a simple rain bag like i did with my old Kodak 4800 and more recently (Wazoo falls non religious Baptism,,, Total immersion ) Simple ziplock bag with filter ring seal. No water or moisture.
So I will sell my Nikon stuff and pay for the Sony.
As for Hands on before you buy, well, Ritz only has the 800 and the rest are point and shoot.
Brucej67 wrote:
flashgordonbrown wrote:
Look into the Sony a77-features to blow away the competition! 24 mp, video, fast focus, etc., etc. and all for $1300! Also, it is weather sealed.
I was looking on
http://www.dpreview.com/previews/sonyslta77/ reviews of the A77 where did you find that it is weather sealed?
check the listing on the Sony Style website-The a77 is basically the a700 with a translucent mirror and video capabilities, as well as a host of additional features. You might also check the reviews on Photography Bay
flashgordonbrown wrote:
Brucej67 wrote:
flashgordonbrown wrote:
Look into the Sony a77-features to blow away the competition! 24 mp, video, fast focus, etc., etc. and all for $1300! Also, it is weather sealed.
I was looking on
http://www.dpreview.com/previews/sonyslta77/ reviews of the A77 where did you find that it is weather sealed?
check the listing on the Sony Style website-The a77 is basically the a700 with a translucent mirror and video capabilities, as well as a host of additional features. You might also check the reviews on Photography Bay
quote=Brucej67 quote=flashgordonbrown Look into ... (
show quote)
I guess weather resistant is the same as weather sealed?
"The SLT-A77 is built for the real world with a magnesium alloy body that combines high strength with light weight. Ports, doors and controls are also weather-resistant for smooth operation under adverse conditions."
I am looking to buy a new camera as well. I own a canon powershot a430 (point and shoot). After all my research i am most likely going with a canon rebel t3.
you just have to do research and see what features you want in the camera.
Flash can't argue with your logic- I agree should consider all brands. What feels right in the hands is very important. The digital nikons have never felt right in my hands whereas their film cameras felt great. For me my nephews canons brought back chat old magic feeling.
I own a Canon 30D and a 60D. I like it very much. Go to a camera store(not a big box store) talk to them. Hold it, play with it.
Find out how much the lens are. Usual they come with one but, you will most likey want to get more in the future.
Next ask ifyou can take some pictures and will they print them up for you. Look at the difference, If any.
Don't take your good camera out in the rain if you can help it and buy a camera bag that has a waterproof rain coat. I always put away my Big camera and take out my small Nikon when bad weather is coming.
Nikon/Canon have 90% of the market in DSLR camera. So sharing lens with a friend may be more possible if you own either one of those.
dasloaf wrote:
If you go with Canon or Nikon, there are numerous lens rental companies and makes taking better pictures, cheaper. They are the big 2 and I would go with either of them before Sony.
Again-lack of information/knowledge with regard to availability of lenses & accessories for Sony(or other brands other than the "big 2). As a former retail camera salesperson, I am aware of a huge assortment of accessories for ALL major brands of cameras. Nikon & Canon have done a good job of hype. When I first started out seriously pursuing photography as a career(40+ years ago!) I was told I had to use Nikon if I was going to be a pro-a concept that I found ridiculous. I have used Minolta, then Sony, and from the quality of my work you would not know which brand of camera I use. It is all a matter of personal preference. PLEASE-do not buy the hype-do your research and make an informed decision.
dpullum wrote:
Yep, Bruce, Thanks for the Info and advice which I would follow if i could. But as in the ol' Simon and Garfunkel song goes "if I could I really would" get a high end that is. If i get the entry level 230, at least I have the lenses and memory to get it going. I can shoot weddings with it. From what I have read the images are very good and in some instances in testing better than Nikon 3000.
http://snapsort.com/compare/Nikon_D3000-vs-Sony_Alpha_DSLR-A230Regarding water problems: I can fabricate a simple rain bag like i did with my old Kodak 4800 and more recently (Wazoo falls non religious Baptism,,, Total immersion ) Simple ziplock bag with filter ring seal. No water or moisture.
So I will sell my Nikon stuff and pay for the Sony.
As for Hands on before you buy, well, Ritz only has the 800 and the rest are point and shoot.
Yep, Bruce, Thanks for the Info and advice which I... (
show quote)
You are right. As for rain gear for these cameras I bought one from Amazon
http://www.amazon.com/cameras-Protects-against-Olympus-Hasselblad/dp/B00179QY76/ref=sr_1_33?ie=UTF8&qid=1316798261&sr=8-33 for $25 and it works great.
If your going to spend the money for a Canon t3i, then look at the 60D. they use the same lens, and the 60D is only a few hundred more. It also is a more durable camera. Can shoot faster, and hold more RAW images. Check out the differences.
Ok! Everyone am a Pentax Digital K110-d. Good camera weathers well. But here the nice thing I can get old film lens an they work on my digital camera. In manual setting. Pentax been around a long time an are very affordable.
Yes, Wildturckey, I think one thing I read, specifically said that the Pentax was water resistant. We shooting in Florida do not need a drop of rain wicking into our electronics.
I do have a few Pentax modern mount and ,,,, yep a few screw mount... that 1972 camera lasted for ever and worked so very well. Yep, Pentax has been around a long time.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.