Shooting images in hi son (Page 10): Hi, I ask one simple question. Different method other than the standard methods we use today. That is all. Man did shit start flying. We have a lot...

mickie12 Loc: Santa Cruz, Ca

Hi,

I ask one simple question. Different method other than the standard methods we use today. That is all. Man did shit start flying. We have a lot of ugly people out there.

Thanks for your feed back!!

fotkaman Loc: Earth

mickie12 wrote:

Hi,

I ask one simple question. Different method other than the standard methods we use today. That is all. Man did shit start flying. We have a lot of ugly people out there.

Thanks for your feed back!!

If you did, why did Admin deleted it?

gdutch Loc: Southington Ohio

I agree with you 100percent. I am new to this forum and after seeing some of the responses to questions, I would be afraid to ask a question. There's always some know it all that ruin things for others.Thanks for the post

mickie12 Loc: Santa Cruz, Ca

THANK YOU!!

I am with you on that subject.

winterrose Loc: Kyneton, Victoria, Australia

mickie12 wrote:

Hi,

I ask one simple question. Different method other than the standard methods we use today. That is all. Man did shit start flying. We have a lot of ugly people out there.

Thanks for your feed back!!

The way you presented yourself I would have expected a couple of gems from you. All that Africa and professional dribble and you can't even photograph a horse in daylight.

fotkaman Loc: Earth

mickie12 wrote:

Hi,

I ask one simple question. Different method other than the standard methods we use today. That is all. Man did shit start flying. We have a lot of ugly people out there.

Thanks for your feed back!!

As a matter of fact, you're now taking advantage of the fact that Admin deleted it, hence people who came late to this thread don't know the full story. You're exploiting it by playing this 'wounded swan' victim game.

timwarduk Loc: Kislingbury, Northants

fotkaman wrote:

As a matter of fact, you're now taking advantage of the fact that Admin deleted it, hence people who came late to this thread don't know the full story. You're exploiting it by playing this 'wounded swan' victim game.

You know what Fotkamen, I find comments like yours, even though written in impeccable English, far more offensive than anything that the OP said and wish that the Admin would sanction you guys for ruining the atmosphere on this Forum. Take your own advice in your Forum Signature, and if you do not know what that is re-read it!

timwarduk Loc: Kislingbury, Northants

fotkaman wrote:

As a matter of fact, you're now taking advantage of the fact that Admin deleted it, hence people who came late to this thread don't know the full story. You're exploiting it by playing this 'wounded swan' victim game.

You know what Fotkamen, I find comments like yours, even though written in impeccable English, far more offensive than anything that the OP said and wish that the Admin would sanction you guys for ruining the atmosphere on this Forum. Take your own advice in your Forum Signature, and if you do not know what that is re-read it!

fotkaman Loc: Earth

timwarduk wrote:

You know what Fotkamen, I find comments like yours, even though written in impeccable English, far more offensive than anything that the OP said and wish that the Admin would sanction you guys for ruining the atmosphere on this Forum. Take your own advice in your Forum Signature, and if you do not know what that is re-read it!

Well, first of all, unlike mickie12, I am NOT using any profanities whatsoever; second, everything I've said here can be backed by facts; third, I maintain respect of others by calling them the names of their choice. I am fotkaman, not Fotkamen.

fotkaman Loc: Earth

timwarduk wrote:

You know what Fotkamen, I find comments like yours, even though written in impeccable English, far more offensive than anything that the OP said and wish that the Admin would sanction you guys for ruining the atmosphere on this Forum. Take your own advice in your Forum Signature, and if you do not know what that is re-read it!

One more thing: If plain truth comes offensive to you, then I understand your frustration.

timwarduk Loc: Kislingbury, Northants

fotkaman wrote:

Well, first of all, unlike mickie12, I am NOT using any profanities whatsoever; second, everything I've said here can be backed by facts; third, I maintain respect of others by calling them the names of their choice. I am fotkaman, not Fotkamen.

You may recognise the words below. Looking back at 2013 I can already say, fotkamen (got it right?), that your contributions to this thread and those of your other flamers who wrecked what could have been a good discussion will be something that I consign to the garbage. Yes I enjoy plain speaking. But I do not enjoy gratuitous sarcasm and put downs. People like you must check the profiles of every person asking a question before deciding whether to treat them to your wisdom or your ridicule! If you have been treated right here why can't you treat others likewise. It seems YOU can't take plain speaking. And again, please take your own advice in your Forum signature, with all respect. Have a great day, fotkamen.

"It's been 6 months now since I've joined, and I had here a helluva good time. By your comments, I've got tutored, inspired, and amused. And I'd like to thank you all for that, regardless whether I agreed with your thoughts or not! Since a new year is coming, my wish to you is that when you look back at 2013 a year from now, you like what you see!
Always yours, fotkaman!"

fotkaman Loc: Earth

timwarduk wrote:

You may recognise the words below. Looking back at... (show quote)

...ok, first, no you still didn't get it right, it is not fotkamen; second, show me where I was sarcastic or a flame-thrower! I didn't get involved here until mickie12 started lying and twisting facts right after Admin had removed his belligerent and profane outbursts. It is mickie12 in the first place who acted improperly! And, IMO, due to the deletion, you are getting things out of context.
When I opened this thread the first time and started reading the first comments, including the stuff that is now deleted, the thing that came to my mind was to give this advise:
"Mickie12, you've titled this Shooting images in hi son. Since you have problems with it, why don't you shoot in low daughter?", but I found it overly sarcastic, hence inappropriate, so I've abandoned that thought.

Bricktop photo's

timwarduk wrote:

You know what Fotkamen, I find comments like yours, even though written in impeccable English, far more offensive than anything that the OP said and wish that the Admin would sanction you guys for ruining the atmosphere on this Forum. Take your own advice in your Forum Signature, and if you do not know what that is re-read it!

:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

FilmFanatic Loc: Waikato, New Zealand

mickie12 wrote:

Hi,

I ask one simple question. Different method other than the standard methods we use today. That is all. Man did shit start flying. We have a lot of ugly people out there.

Thanks for your feed back!!

Let me ask you one question: are you, or are you not qualified to work as a professional photographer as your bio states? Do you have formal training? If not then you are just another wannabe who picked up a dslr and decides he is a pro

Marc-Wi Loc: Oshkosh Wi

mickie12 wrote:

Hi,

I ask one simple question. Different method other than the standard methods we use today. That is all. Man did shit start flying. We have a lot of ugly people out there.

Thanks for your feed back!!

Ten pages and 2-3 days later and you've still got the potty mouth running. Families and young people are on this site.Grow up and CLEAN IT UP.