Check out Close Up Photography section of our forum.
picture quality
May 21, 2013 20:14:13 #
UP-2-IT wrote:
With this one, very well done, I have to wonder if perhaps you are't being overpowered by the number of pilings in the picture. For me personally I would say, well it's entirely to busy and I would look for something a bit more settled. The quality of your work is very good but it's just like a family reunion, Ya got to many cuzins sitting at the table.
lol maybe you are right, thank you for your imput and I will take your words on board with me :)
May 21, 2013 20:16:36 #
gdwsr wrote:
Was your, "koalas and friends" post taken with the same camera? Nothing wrong with those.
Yes it was and that was before I started really playing with the settings. I hope to just keep improving and this site is fabulous for working things out
:)
May 21, 2013 20:17:34 #
lightchime wrote:
You shot at f/22. Your lens may not be as sharp at this aperture as a bit more wide open. This by itself may not answer your problem, but it can be a significant factor for some lenses.
Thankyou lightchime, I have since been working on my sweetspot for aperture. Im hoping to improve that :)
Check out Advice from the Pros section of our forum.
May 21, 2013 20:18:42 #
Wahawk wrote:
I think if you look at the original, directly from the camera, you will find a much larger image that can be printed to 16x20 inches or larger. That is if you have the camera set to take the largest possible images!
Yes, it was and is and now I have the settings on my LR so when I export they are bigger than stamps. :)
Cheers
May 21, 2013 20:19:13 #
johneccles wrote:
I think F22 might be the problem, it's not always a good thing to go the far end of F range, I usually go up to a couple of stop below say around F18.
thankyou, will give it a go :)
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.