LARRYR.
Loc: Saint Martinville, La.
SHUTERED wrote:
tschmath wrote:
Huey Driver wrote:
Special kind of stupid
This logic always astounds me. So, we know that laws against murder won't deter murderers, so why have them? Laws against pedophilia don't stop child abuse, so why have them? Speed limits don't stop speeders, so why have them? As I said, the logic behind this poster is completely idiotic.
IDIOTIC is recognizing the fact that laws against murder, pedophilia, and speeding don't stop defective mentalities and suggesting that haveing more gun laws will reduce or end gun violence.
quote=tschmath quote=Huey Driver Special kind of... (
show quote)
Liberial left doesn't like dealing with facts, it's been proven
over and over. Look at at the guns given to the drug
cartels in Mexico, look at our embassy that was attacted
and we lost 4 great men and the White House is still fal-
sifing what trully happen.I'd like to see if Congressmen
really have the citizens best intrust at heart. I was wonder-
ing if we as gun owners would be willing to give up one
round of ammo,out of our 30 round clip, for lets say every
$ 50,000 cut they would be willing to take out of their
salary each year. After all its not about money or just an
agenda, it's whats best for the Citizens, isn't it.
Ya, I know, They work so hard for their pay, why would
they be willing to give up a little for such a worthy cause.
Sinbad
Loc: South Wales Coastal
The 2nd amend seems to be somewhat difficult to understand to for people, and there is also some disagrement between the jurists
tschmath wrote:
Huey Driver wrote:
Special kind of stupid
This logic always astounds me. So, we know that laws against murder won't deter murderers, so why have them? Laws against pedophilia don't stop child abuse, so why have them? Speed limits don't stop speeders, so why have them? As I said, the logic behind this poster is completely idiotic.
I'm thinking you completely missed the message in that photo. The message to me is two fold. 1. If criminals won't obey it then why should we disarm law abiding citizens? 2. Bandaid fixes do not stop problem bleeding.
imntrt1 wrote:
tschmath wrote:
Huey Driver wrote:
Special kind of stupid
This logic always astounds me. So, we know that laws against murder won't deter murderers, so why have them? Laws against pedophilia don't stop child abuse, so why have them? Speed limits don't stop speeders, so why have them? As I said, the logic behind this poster is completely idiotic.
I'm thinking you completely missed the message in that photo. The message to me is two fold. 1. If criminals won't obey it then why should we disarm law abiding citizens? 2. Bandaid fixes do not stop problem bleeding.
quote=tschmath quote=Huey Driver Special kind of... (
show quote)
"If criminals won't obey it then why should we disarm law abiding citizens?"
Wait, wait, I know the answer to that...Because we employ people to represent us and make logical laws for us, whose mentality and judgement does not seem to go beyond cutting the branch they sit on. You know the type. Those neat guys and gals, who get better pay and benefits than anybody to produce absolutely NOTHING, and as a reward we keep re-electing them over and over again....Well, they seem to think if you outlaw water, no one will ever drown again.
Sinbad
Loc: South Wales Coastal
We seems we agree to disagree
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.