Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Check out Photo Critique Section section of our forum.
Photo Gallery
Lots of flowers
Nov 21, 2011 00:38:35   #
ShelterCove Loc: Nowhere, CA
 
Hi, Like lots of others, would like feedback. These images were taken with a Panasonic Lumix and have Photoshop Elements filters applied. Love flowers and close ups. :)

Clivia flowers
Clivia flowers...

Allium flower
Allium flower...

Gazania blossom
Gazania blossom...

Reply
Nov 22, 2011 06:02:01   #
bobbys512 Loc: new bedford mass
 
Beautiful Pics

Reply
Nov 27, 2011 01:52:00   #
ShelterCove Loc: Nowhere, CA
 
Thanks!

Reply
Check out Traditional Street and Architectural Photography section of our forum.
Nov 27, 2011 23:14:24   #
Kirby 2 Loc: Atlanta, Georgia
 
Lovely!

Reply
Nov 27, 2011 23:24:23   #
docrob Loc: Durango, Colorado
 
Shot 1). Question for you: How much did you play with this - the lighting and the composition?

Comment: I ask because when i look at this image there is alot i like very much (compostion, cropping, clarity, color) and i would like to see more play with the exposure. Looks to me like a shot where the creator let the camera tell her what was "correct."

Shot 2) At first take - breathtaking - then a shake of the head and a "what the hell is that green thing hanging down," thought. Very interesting flower - lot's of potential there - were it me, that green thing would be gone.

Question: how much did you play with light (assuming artificial source) or how often do you return to photograph this same subject different day/hour?

Shot 3) The kind of image that is good but does not stand out - no "X factor." Still, one that every flower photographer goes through/works through if they continue to concentrate their creative abilities on floral works.

Reply
Nov 28, 2011 00:09:01   #
ShelterCove Loc: Nowhere, CA
 
docrob wrote:
Shot 1). Question for you: How much did you play with this - the lighting and the composition?

Comment: I ask because when i look at this image there is alot i like very much (compostion, cropping, clarity, color) and i would like to see more play with the exposure. Looks to me like a shot where the creator let the camera tell her what was "correct."

Shot 2) At first take - breathtaking - then a shake of the head and a "what the hell is that green thing hanging down," thought. Very interesting flower - lot's of potential there - were it me, that green thing would be gone.

Question: how much did you play with light (assuming artificial source) or how often do you return to photograph this same subject different day/hour?

Shot 3) The kind of image that is good but does not stand out - no "X factor." Still, one that every flower photographer goes through/works through if they continue to concentrate their creative abilities on floral works.
Shot 1). Question for you: How much did you play... (show quote)


For #1 other than using Photoshop Elements to darken the background and remove some leaves, the lighting was natural, though in a greenhouse. See attached original image.

#2 Was "posed". Flower suspended upside down against a black background. Background darkened even more.

#3. I tried many versions of this flower. I just loved the vibrant colors.

I am not experienced in artificial light and did not use it with any of these images. #3 was taken at a garden shop. I also don't return to photograph the same subject at different day/time. I will give that a try. I usually capture what I encounter and attempt to make an interesting image from it.

I do use the filters in Elements and particularly like the Watercolor one.

Thank you for your input. Much appreciated.



Reply
Nov 28, 2011 00:21:29   #
docrob Loc: Durango, Colorado
 
ShelterCove wrote:
docrob wrote:
Shot 1). Question for you: How much did you play with this - the lighting and the composition?

Comment: I ask because when i look at this image there is alot i like very much (compostion, cropping, clarity, color) and i would like to see more play with the exposure. Looks to me like a shot where the creator let the camera tell her what was "correct."

Shot 2) At first take - breathtaking - then a shake of the head and a "what the hell is that green thing hanging down," thought. Very interesting flower - lot's of potential there - were it me, that green thing would be gone.

Question: how much did you play with light (assuming artificial source) or how often do you return to photograph this same subject different day/hour?

Shot 3) The kind of image that is good but does not stand out - no "X factor." Still, one that every flower photographer goes through/works through if they continue to concentrate their creative abilities on floral works.
Shot 1). Question for you: How much did you play... (show quote)


For #1 other than using Photoshop Elements to darken the background and remove some leaves, the lighting was natural, though in a greenhouse. See attached original image.

#2 Was "posed". Flower suspended upside down against a black background. Background darkened even more.

#3. I tried many versions of this flower. I just loved the vibrant colors.

I am not experienced in artificial light and did not use it with any of these images. #3 was taken at a garden shop. I also don't return to photograph the same subject at different day/time. I will give that a try. I usually capture what I encounter and attempt to make an interesting image from it.

I do use the filters in Elements and particularly like the Watercolor one.

Thank you for your input. Much appreciated.
quote=docrob Shot 1). Question for you: How muc... (show quote)


Thanks - and youre welcome. You have some ability. From the original I see how much you cropped. Can you do that kind of composition to start with?

A teacher I had once (google Nancy Rotenberg, photographer) taught me to "get beyond the handshake." It has been exceedingly good advice.

It is perhaps more difficult to perform serious photographic work in a commercial green house but can be done and while in such a setting the cycles of the flowers will be truncated, it is still a good idea to re-visit one's subjects. Especially those subjects which seem to choose us.

Reply
 
 
Nov 28, 2011 01:21:56   #
ShelterCove Loc: Nowhere, CA
 
docrob wrote:
ShelterCove wrote:
docrob wrote:
Shot 1). Question for you: How much did you play with this - the lighting and the composition?

Comment: I ask because when i look at this image there is alot i like very much (compostion, cropping, clarity, color) and i would like to see more play with the exposure. Looks to me like a shot where the creator let the camera tell her what was "correct."

Shot 2) At first take - breathtaking - then a shake of the head and a "what the hell is that green thing hanging down," thought. Very interesting flower - lot's of potential there - were it me, that green thing would be gone.

Question: how much did you play with light (assuming artificial source) or how often do you return to photograph this same subject different day/hour?

Shot 3) The kind of image that is good but does not stand out - no "X factor." Still, one that every flower photographer goes through/works through if they continue to concentrate their creative abilities on floral works.
Shot 1). Question for you: How much did you play... (show quote)


For #1 other than using Photoshop Elements to darken the background and remove some leaves, the lighting was natural, though in a greenhouse. See attached original image.

#2 Was "posed". Flower suspended upside down against a black background. Background darkened even more.

#3. I tried many versions of this flower. I just loved the vibrant colors.

I am not experienced in artificial light and did not use it with any of these images. #3 was taken at a garden shop. I also don't return to photograph the same subject at different day/time. I will give that a try. I usually capture what I encounter and attempt to make an interesting image from it.

I do use the filters in Elements and particularly like the Watercolor one.

Thank you for your input. Much appreciated.
quote=docrob Shot 1). Question for you: How muc... (show quote)


Thanks - and youre welcome. You have some ability. From the original I see how much you cropped. Can you do that kind of composition to start with?

A teacher I had once (google Nancy Rotenberg, photographer) taught me to "get beyond the handshake." It has been exceedingly good advice.

It is perhaps more difficult to perform serious photographic work in a commercial green house but can be done and while in such a setting the cycles of the flowers will be truncated, it is still a good idea to re-visit one's subjects. Especially those subjects which seem to choose us.
quote=ShelterCove quote=docrob Shot 1). Questio... (show quote)


I am in awe of and inspired by Ms. Rotenberg's work! I often tend to get too close to my subjects but something prevented me from doing so for the Clivia image. I can see where a good tripod is needed. Thanks again!

Reply
Nov 28, 2011 02:31:02   #
nivek340 Loc: South Hadley Ma.
 
i like the second photo. it keep me wondering. the others are just colorful. thanks

Reply
Mar 13, 2012 19:41:37   #
Sorabh Khilery Loc: India
 
beautiful !!!

Reply
Mar 13, 2012 20:24:40   #
ward5311 Loc: Georgia
 
Great shots :thumbup:

Reply
Check out Wedding Photography section of our forum.
Mar 13, 2012 20:39:02   #
ShelterCove Loc: Nowhere, CA
 
Sorabh Khilery wrote:
beautiful !!!


Thank you kind sir!

Reply
Mar 13, 2012 20:39:51   #
ShelterCove Loc: Nowhere, CA
 
ward5311 wrote:
Great shots :thumbup:


Thank you too!

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out The Pampered Pets Corner section of our forum.
Photo Gallery
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.