AF-S DX Micro NIKKOR 40mm f/2.8G
Jan 27, 2013 19:31:16 #
I am thinking about getting this as my next lens, most of the reviews i have read are good but I wanted to ask if anyone here has any experience or info on this lens? thanks in advance...
Jan 27, 2013 20:42:39 #
Suggestion: don't buy DX lenses. You will buy a much better lens if you get the 50mm f1.8 G for 215 or the 50mm f1.8 D for 130. Or the 35mm f2 for 360.
These lenses are better glass and will hold their value and should you decide to move to full frame in the future you have already have lens to start with.
These lenses are better glass and will hold their value and should you decide to move to full frame in the future you have already have lens to start with.
Jan 27, 2013 20:52:43 #
If you have a camera with a focusing motor I would suggest the 60mm Macro lens. You are looking for a Macro Lens?? They run about $300 in mint used condition on ebay. You can get 1:1 true macro with the 60mm. If you want to really do macro I would suggest a Macro lens in the 100mm range
Visit the Macro Page on this forum for good solid advice on macro lens and all that goes with the how too: to do macro photography http://www.uglyhedgehog.com/s-102-1.html
Visit the Macro Page on this forum for good solid advice on macro lens and all that goes with the how too: to do macro photography http://www.uglyhedgehog.com/s-102-1.html
justingraham wrote:
I am thinking about getting this as my next lens, most of the reviews i have read are good but I wanted to ask if anyone here has any experience or info on this lens? thanks in advance...
Jan 27, 2013 21:00:28 #
I should have mentioned I am using a D3100 now,looking to upgrade to a D7000 in a couple months....full frame eventually though that's a ways down the road.
Jan 27, 2013 21:07:41 #
Also, I thought the nikor 40mm was 1:1? I would like the 60 or 100 but like many, funds are short
Jan 27, 2013 21:10:19 #
justingraham wrote:
I should have mentioned I am using a D3100 now,looking to upgrade to a D7000 in a couple months....full frame eventually though that's a ways down the road.
If I spoke too soon, sorry. I figured DX since Nikon only makes a 40 in DX. What will you be using the lens for? I'm sticking with buy FX lens. The Hog is filled with posts about taking a beating when they upgraded formats and you will (probably) do so some time in the future. Is there a FX lens that will accomplish your needs?
Jan 27, 2013 21:10:20 #
I'll agree with previous posts it's a better long term investment to go with an FX lens. For macro and close-up, my choice would be something in the 105mm range, as it allows a little more distance between lens and subject. This gives you more room for lighting and keeps your camera from casting a shadow on your subject. A 40mm will put your lens right on top of your subject, with no "breathing" room.
Jan 27, 2013 21:26:53 #
yeah, thats what I was afraid of Danilo....I am definitly interested in macro shots, and my next question was in regards to distance from subject. Ok so with an FX lens i could get that now and use it with my D3100 and it would transition with me as I upgrade....is that correct? Thank you all for the insight.
Jan 27, 2013 21:33:33 #
justingraham wrote:
yeah, thats what I was afraid of Danilo....I am definitly interested in macro shots, and my next question was in regards to distance from subject. Ok so with an FX lens i could get that now and use it with my D3100 and it would transition with me as I upgrade....is that correct? Thank you all for the insight.
Correct. I didn't think about macro I was so intent on you not making a mistake buying DX lenses.
The experts in macro can tell you what lens to buy- I never got into it. Of course you could post a question on that point if you choose...
Good luck.
Jan 27, 2013 21:51:46 #
justingraham wrote:
Many of your questions will be answered reading this thread:I am definitly interested in macro shots, and my next question was in regards to distance from subject. Ok so with an FX lens i could get that now and use it with my D3100 and it would transition with me as I upgrade....is that correct? Thank you all for the insight.
FAQ: Why are there macro lenses of different focal lengths?
http://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-83141-1.html
Much more info here:
Introduction to True Macro-Photography Forum
http://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-22447-1.html
Jan 28, 2013 07:17:53 #
$300 used Nikon 60mm, $490 brand new Tokina 100mm witch is as good or better than the nikon 105mm. As Nikonian72 suggested check out the macro forum if you want solid advice
justingraham wrote:
Also, I thought the nikor 40mm was 1:1? I would like the 60 or 100 but like many, funds are short
Jan 28, 2013 07:39:45 #
I use the 40mm macro lens all the time....very nice lens for the price and can be used in many different ways. If you like I can post a shot and see for yourself what it can do.
Jan 28, 2013 08:30:03 #
This picture was taken with this lens, however like others have said if you want to shoot macro go for the 60mm or beter yet the 105mm.
justingraham wrote:
I am thinking about getting this as my next lens, most of the reviews i have read are good but I wanted to ask if anyone here has any experience or info on this lens? thanks in advance...
Bee
Jan 28, 2013 10:01:46 #
justingraham wrote:
I am thinking about getting this as my next lens, most of the reviews i have read are good but I wanted to ask if anyone here has any experience or info on this lens? thanks in advance...
You would probably be better off with the Nikon 105mm Macro lens.
With a 40mm, you have to get in fairly close to the subject, and if its wildlife you are after shooting, they will be off before you get close enough.
If you are using a DX body, you will benefit from the FX lens crop factor of 1.5, this will effectively give you a focal length of approximately 157mm.
Jan 28, 2013 10:13:00 #
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.