Please give me a feedback.
Rongnongno wrote:
Correct, if something is presented as a link and the op does not care enough to make a minimal effort to make it visible, why should I?
A shame for the people who don't know how to do so.
rbtree
Loc: Shoreline, WA, United States
Yep, I only did that as someone else had suggested cropping out the sky.
rbtree
Loc: Shoreline, WA, United States
Thanks. I had downloaded my own images that I had posted online. I have them in a "moon" folder on my desktop..,. as I said, too lazy to find the originals... and the exif data is only for the webp shots.
Longshadow wrote:
A shame for the people who don't know how to do so.
I learned, everyone can do so. I always try to learn.
Rongnongno wrote:
I learned, everyone can do so. I always try to learn.
I learned that everyone doesn't want to be like everyone else.
Well, for the most part anyway.
I've also learned that there are may people who expect others to do things the way they do....
Can and
wanting to are two different things.
I personally, want to be me.
I have a desire to learn, just not necessarily about the same things others do.
Especially the minutia, even though I may comprehend it.
There are a plethora of things I
can do,
I simply don't desire to do them all.
Especially be like someone else.
I'll bet you have no interest in building your own website from scratch (hand coded) like I did.
Something I wanted to
learn, do you? "Everyone can do so"....
I'll continue to post JPEGS.
Actually, I am working on one. Just not hand coded, even if I learned HTML long ago, it changes too fast to keep up. (Lazy ass here)
Between creating the site I am messing with PS CC I also work on the yard clean up and among other things.
Rongnongno wrote:
Actually, I am working on one. Just not hand coded, even if I learned HTML long ago, it changes too fast to keep up. (Lazy ass here)
Bewtten creating the site I am messing with PS CC, the yard clean up among other things.
Not like you should because you can, eh?
Like using the image tag?
(I'll
NEVER use a canned site builder.)
Longshadow wrote:
Not like you should because you can, eh?
Like using the image tag?
(I'll NEVER use a canned site builder.)
Actually, this one is hard to learn and no canned solution... You have to 'crack the code' to do something halfway decent, especially when you want a responsive website.
The way I feel when working with the site software...
Going seamlessly from full page to a smartphone...
Rongnongno wrote:
The way I feel when working with the site software...
That's why I hand code.....
Many of those things look lousy on a laptop. Top banner, bottom banner, narrow "viewing window".
Luckily, it works on a phone.
(I code for computers.)
Hang in there!
I think the edited version is the best. I like the grass. In fact, I assumed it was the subject. It catches the light nicely. I find the blurred foreground distracting but I can't see any way to crop it.
Caribou wrote:
I think the edited version is the best. I like the grass. In fact, I assumed it was the subject. It catches the light nicely. I find the blurred foreground distracting but I can't see any way to crop it.
► You missed this
post...► The blurred background is what makes the image. If it was an open sky, the grass would not stand out.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.