srg wrote:
They admitted to lying to the tune of three quarters of a BILLION dollars.
Yes, they just happened to get caught in the secret lie. Before they were caught in that lie were they actually truth tellers before? Absolutely not the only difference between Fox News and CNN and MSNBC is that the other two are not charged for their lies. Fox News CNN and MSNBC are all propaganda machines that lie profusely to their viewers.
Racmanaz wrote:
Yes, they just happened to get caught in the secret lie. Before they were caught in that lie were they actually truth tellers before? Absolutely not the only difference between Fox News and CNN and MSNBC is that the other two are not charged for their lies. Fox News CNN and MSNBC are all propaganda machines that lie profusely to their viewers.
I'll wager you have only one eye and it doesn't look too good.
Kraken wrote:
I'll wager you have only one eye and it doesn't look too good.
But seeing is believing.
Too bad raQ only looks at bullshit.
srg wrote:
But seeing is believing.
Too bad raQ only looks at bullshit.
You are right, I should stop looking at your posts.
Frank T wrote:
As usual, Fox News got it wrong.
He was not the victim of a carjacking. What occurred was that someone broke into his unoccupied vehicle while it was parked in a garage and stole his luggage.
So in the end, Yes, he was the victim of a crime, but it was neither a carjacking nor a robbery.
Why can't Fox News be truthful, just once? This is why people call it Faux News.
Where did Fox report that it was a car jacking, Fox did not report that, you made that up. Read the link fool.
Kraken wrote:
Sorry, I am late....
My, my, have you seen your Obstetrician?
srg wrote:
But seeing is believing.
Too bad raQ only looks at bullshit.
Dumbasses arguing over a true story correctly reported.... Some people are just as stupid as stupid can be. BTW, the Fox settlement happened to make the same defense that MSNBC made in a case involving Queen Maddow. It is also worth noting that that suit was against one of their opinion shows that their hard news devision is and always has been accurate in their reporting.
Effate
Loc: El Dorado Hills, Ca.
Frank T wrote:
As usual, Fox News got it wrong.
He was not the victim of a carjacking. What occurred was that someone broke into his unoccupied vehicle while it was parked in a garage and stole his luggage.
So in the end, Yes, he was the victim of a crime, but it was neither a carjacking nor a robbery.
Why can't Fox News be truthful, just once? This is why people call it Faux News.
You had a career in law enforcement so you obviously know and heard it 100’s of times, “my house got robbed or my car got robbed” when in fact it was a burglary or a car clout.
Effate wrote:
You had a career in law enforcement so you obviously know and heard it 100’s of times, “my house got robbed or my car got robbed” when in fact it was a burglary or a car clout.
Do you really believe that Frank had a career in law enforcement?
Effate wrote:
You had a career in law enforcement so you obviously know and heard it 100’s of times, “my house got robbed or my car got robbed” when in fact it was a burglary or a car clout.
Yes, I've heard uneducated, uninformed people use the term robbed when they meant stolen.
I suppose considering it's fox news, I should allow for them being uninformed and uneducated.
Frank T wrote:
Yes, I've heard uneducated, uninformed people use the term robbed when they meant stolen.
I suppose considering it's fox news, I should allow for them being uninformed and uneducated.
You are such a DA... force or even personal interaction is not required to meet the definition of robbery.
Merriam Webster.....
"robbed; robbing
Synonyms of rob
transitive verb
1
a
(1)
: to take something away from by force : steal from
(2)
: to take personal property from by violence or threat
b
(1)
: to remove valuables without right from (a place)
(2)
: to take the contents of (a receptacle)
c
: to take away as loot : STEAL
rob jewelry
2
a
: to deprive of something due, expected, or desired
b
: to withhold unjustly or injuriously"
Blurryeyed wrote:
You are such a DA... force or even personal interaction is not required to meet the definition of robbery.
Merriam Webster.....
"robbed; robbing
Synonyms of rob
transitive verb
1
a
(1)
: to take something away from by force : steal from
(2)
: to take personal property from by violence or threat
b
(1)
: to remove valuables without right from (a place)
(2)
: to take the contents of (a receptacle)
c
: to take away as loot : STEAL
rob jewelry
2
a
: to deprive of something due, expected, or desired
b
: to withhold unjustly or injuriously"
You are such a DA... force or even personal intera... (
show quote)
Hate to say this but Frank is right on this one. There is a difference between stealing or theft and robbing/robbery .
“The difference between theft and robbery is that theft is merely stealing someone's property, whereas robbery is using force or fear to take property from a person's immediate possession. So theft is a less serious property crime. Robbery is a more serious violent crime.”
https://www.shouselaw.com › blog
"Theft" vs "Robbery" - What's the Difference? - Shouse Law Group
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.