Racmanaz wrote:
https://youtube.com/shorts/mpPHk9Hrgzg?si=khKdn-PbMFFtrlv1
Lolol
Great question that was asked. Any surprise that we have 'crickets' in response???
You must be God, because you pretend to know when life starts.
National Park wrote:
You must be God, because you pretend to know when life starts.
Couldn’t we say the same thing about you? So all the scientist who say when life starts, they are God then?
Racmanaz wrote:
https://youtube.com/shorts/mpPHk9Hrgzg?si=khKdn-PbMFFtrlv1
Lolol
The 6th commandment is not "thou shalt not kill", it is "thou shalt not murder".
Why not "kill"? Because kill applies to anything living, not just human beings. Swat the fly, go to hell?
Murder is the unlawful killing of another human without justification or valid excuse committed with the necessary intention as defined by the law in a specific jurisdiction. -- Wikipedia
Abortion is not murder when it is legal. In fact, it is usually not murder when it is illegal. See
https://www.axios.com/2022/06/08/abortion-bans-penalty-fines-prison-us-states#What is the justification or valid excuse for abortion? A woman's right to not be forced to carry a pregnancy to term and be subject to the inherent risks of childbirth.
jcboy3 wrote:
The 6th commandment is not "thou shalt not kill", it is "thou shalt not murder".
Why not "kill"? Because kill applies to anything living, not just human beings. Swat the fly, go to hell?
Murder is the unlawful killing of another human without justification or valid excuse committed with the necessary intention as defined by the law in a specific jurisdiction. -- Wikipedia
Abortion is not murder when it is legal. In fact, it is usually not murder when it is illegal. See
https://www.axios.com/2022/06/08/abortion-bans-penalty-fines-prison-us-states#What is the justification or valid excuse for abortion? A woman's right to not be forced to carry a pregnancy to term and be subject to the inherent risks of childbirth.
The 6th commandment is not "thou shalt not ki... (
show quote)
Your mistake is that you’re conflating man’s law with God‘s commandments. It doesn’t matter if we as men legalize all killings of humans it’s still murder in the eyes of God and That’s the point.
Racmanaz wrote:
Your mistake is that you’re conflating man’s law with God‘s commandments. It doesn’t matter if we as men legalize all killings of humans it’s still murder in the eyes of God and That’s the point.
Your mistake is first imagining there is a God, then imagining that God communicated commandments only to a Middle East desert tribe, and then imagining that God has eyes, and then imagining that there are loopholes and exceptions and justifications for killing other people, and then imagining that a fetus is a person.
What a load of rubbish.
jcboy3 wrote:
Your mistake is first imagining there is a God, then imagining that God communicated commandments only to a Middle East desert tribe, and then imagining that God has eyes, and then imagining that there are loopholes and exceptions and justifications for killing other people, and then imagining that a fetus is a person.
What a load of rubbish.
How can your statement about fetus be rubbish? You were once a fetus who has now grown into a, well..., you. Some would consider you a "mistake" for believing in some of the nonsense you dream up.
Racmanaz wrote:
https://youtube.com/shorts/mpPHk9Hrgzg?si=khKdn-PbMFFtrlv1
Lolol
and yet you're well *on board with the grotesque and persistent slaughter of children in Gaza.
* A shrill ... rah, rah, ... "You anti-Semite!!!" on board. Virtue signaling much Karen?
jcboy3 wrote:
Your mistake is first imagining there is a God, then imagining that God communicated commandments only to a Middle East desert tribe, and then imagining that God has eyes, and then imagining that there are loopholes and exceptions and justifications for killing other people, and then imagining that a fetus is a person.
What a load of rubbish.
Most all of your responses are rubbish. This one is no exception.
jcboy3 wrote:
More Rac rubbish.
Your responses are always a rubbish, rubbish, rubbish rubbish
Racmanaz wrote:
Your mistake is that you’re conflating man’s law with God‘s commandments. It doesn’t matter if we as men legalize all killings of humans it’s still murder in the eyes of God and That’s the point.
Malum in se (moral common sense, Jesus not required)
True Grit's - LaBoeuf: As I understand it, Chaney... or Chelmsford, as he called himshelf in Texas... shot the senator's dog. When the senator remonstrated, Chelmsford shot him as well. You could argue that the shooting of the dog was merely an instance of malum prohibitum, but the shooting of a senator is indubitably an instance of malum in se.
Rooster Cogburn: Malla-men what?
Mattie Ross: Malum in se. The distinction is between an act that is wrong in itself, and an act that is wrong only according to our laws and mores. It is Latin.
Tex Caster: We don't need the MAGAtrump Freedom Jesus/God to know up from down and wrong from right. Deal with it Happy-Clappers-Boy.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.