Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
The Attic
Misogyny vs Freedom... Long-Term effects of Restricting Women's HealthCare
Page <prev 2 of 2
Apr 11, 2024 21:39:26   #
Racmanaz Loc: Sunny Tucson!
 
ArtzDarkroom wrote:
According to my Crystal Ball of Vision:

Many fertile women of means will flee Red states restricting their health-care.
Many of them will not be leaving alone.
Population shifts recorded in the next Census will change the number of congressmen needed to represent them.
The majority could change toward states gaining in population.
.
.
.
Population declines in Red States... their economy declines
until they surrender to a power greater than them...
Girl Power.

lol
According to my Crystal Ball of Vision: br br Ma... (show quote)


Once again, who is restricting women's healthcare??

Reply
Apr 11, 2024 21:55:43   #
Texcaster Loc: Queensland
 
Racmanaz wrote:
Once again, who is restricting women's healthcare??



Reply
Apr 12, 2024 18:32:25   #
Blurryeyed Loc: NC Mountains.
 
ArtzDarkroom wrote:
According to my Crystal Ball of Vision:

Many fertile women of means will flee Red states restricting their health-care.
Many of them will not be leaving alone.
Population shifts recorded in the next Census will change the number of congressmen needed to represent them.
The majority could change toward states gaining in population.
.
.
.
Population declines in Red States... their economy declines
until they surrender to a power greater than them...
Girl Power.

lol
According to my Crystal Ball of Vision: br br Ma... (show quote)


Since when do democrats consider long term effects? You guys usually just screw things up and pretend that things are going great.

Reply
 
 
Apr 12, 2024 19:21:33   #
ArtzDarkroom Loc: Near Disneyland-Orange County, California
 
Blurryeyed wrote:
Since when do democrats consider long term effects? You guys usually just screw things up and pretend that things are going great.


If you are referring to MY prediction... it's not a Democrat thing. It's my prediction.

The long term effect of my prediction is not going to show results until after the 2030 Census data is tabulated. I suspect that from now until then migration patterns may actually be imperceptible for awhile. The effects will show up each election where women's issues are on the ballot. I also suppose a declining population in restrictive states may also become apparent.

Reply
Apr 13, 2024 09:36:44   #
Blurryeyed Loc: NC Mountains.
 
ArtzDarkroom wrote:
If you are referring to MY prediction... it's not a Democrat thing. It's my prediction.

The long term effect of my prediction is not going to show results until after the 2030 Census data is tabulated. I suspect that from now until then migration patterns may actually be imperceptible for awhile. The effects will show up each election where women's issues are on the ballot. I also suppose a declining population in restrictive states may also become apparent.


One would think that the restrictive red states will sooner or later compromise and adopt laws similar to those predominate in the EU. Oddly you are focused on the red states and the 2030 census, States like CA and NY even with the unfettered border crossings to my knowledge are still experiencing a net loss in population as many of your citizens are fleeing those deep blue bastions of insanity.

Reply
Apr 13, 2024 09:53:10   #
Triple G
 
Blurryeyed wrote:
One would think that the restrictive red states will sooner or later compromise and adopt laws similar to those predominate in the EU. Oddly you are focused on the red states and the 2030 census, States like CA and NY even with the unfettered border crossings to my knowledge are still experiencing a net loss in population as many of your citizens are fleeing those deep blue bastions of insanity.


You've attributed a fallacy argument which applies political causation to events that are statistically shown to be because of living costs, climate, job opportunities and taxation. Your argument really falls flat when you note the migration out of FL because of climate and increasing cost of living for retirees on fixed income due to homeowners and car insurance rates climbing. Those are the same reasons we moved from IL to TN - climate and cost of living on a fixed income.

https://www.clickorlando.com/news/investigators/2024/02/08/why-floridas-car-insurance-premiums-are-the-most-expensive-in-the-us/

https://www.abcactionnews.com/news/price-of-paradise/florida-life-why-people-are-flocking-and-fleeing-to-the-sunshine-state

https://www.forbes.com/sites/katharinabuchholz/2024/01/12/the-us-states-losing--gaining-population-infographic/?sh=4e85abf15e13

https://www.quora.com/If-you-had-to-relocate-would-the-politics-of-the-area-you-choose-to-move-to-generally-conservative-or-liberal-red-state-blue-state-be-a-determining-factor-in-choosing-where-to-live

You will get a pretty good indicator of why someone switched states when you ask the person if they are on SS or a state or corp pension? Many pensions do not have auto COLA increases so the fixed is really fixed. SS and some state pensions have the escalator. It's clear that this is a big driver of the decision to be here since many of the new villagers are auto company retirees.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 2
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
The Attic
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.