A rose by any other name...
Delderby wrote:
Great Pic - but I don't see it as a landscape.
I'm confused. Just what do you see this image as being, if not a landscape? The only other thing I can imagine would be architecture. Are there some hard fast rules about architectural photography. Just asking.
lmTrying wrote:
I'm confused. Just what do you see this image as being, if not a landscape? The only other thing I can imagine would be architecture. Are there some hard fast rules about architectural photography. Just asking.
My personal opinion is that it is high class photography of an architectural image.
I don't think in terms of "hard and fast rules" but it seems sensible to classify pictures by content, and buildings should, I think, have an overall classification of "Architecture" rather than grouping them into "Landscape" -along with pics of the Grand Canyon!
TomA'to..ToMAH'to. The great thing about opinions is everyone can be RIGHT!
Nice lighting on this home. Good capture
Nice photo, but the lights should be down from the top. Keep the night shy dark.
Delderby wrote:
My personal opinion is that it is high class photography of an architectural image.
I don't think in terms of "hard and fast rules" but it seems sensible to classify pictures by content, and buildings should, I think, have an overall classification of "Architecture" rather than grouping them into "Landscape" -along with pics of the Grand Canyon!
So architectural is a sub category of landscape?
I'm always looking for logical methods of organizing photos. Such as; shows: dog shows, car shows tractor shows, model shows. Course that gets confused with, cars: drag cars, custom cars, car shows, trucks in car shows, street machines, hot rods, etc.
Not that I have that many landscapes and architectural to worry about. Just picking a fellow hogger's brain. Thanks.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.