Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Heavy Lenses
Page <prev 2 of 5 next> last>>
Apr 1, 2024 21:24:24   #
ricardo00
 
SX2002 wrote:
Not a problem for me thankfully. I've had multiple spinal surgeries and looking at more in a couple of months. I just carry mine by the tripod mount, just like carrying a suitcase...


I have wondered if wildlife photographers (ie. those using big lenses) have a higher incidence of back injuries (ie. surgeries). Anyone know of any studies and/or statistics?

Reply
Apr 1, 2024 21:46:31   #
SX2002 Loc: Adelaide, South Australia
 
ricardo00 wrote:
I have wondered if wildlife photographers (ie. those using big lenses) have a higher incidence of back injuries (ie. surgeries). Anyone know of any studies and/or statistics?


I've never heard of any...mine was being hit in the rear while sitting at a red light by an idiot doing 80-90k/h. He was actually looking out his side window...

Reply
Apr 2, 2024 05:51:31   #
Capn_Dave
 
I am going to recommend the Cotton Carrier also. There are others that are good also. This type of harness distributes the weight of the camera so ti is not hanging around the neck and is a secure mount that releases with a twist

Reply
 
 
Apr 2, 2024 06:24:51   #
Jrhoffman75 Loc: Conway, New Hampshire
 
There is this as well:

https://www.speed-shooter.com/

A less sophisticated version can be created using a parade flag holder.

Reply
Apr 2, 2024 06:58:00   #
billnikon Loc: Pennsylvania/Ohio/Florida/Maui/Oregon/Vermont
 
stu352 wrote:
I managed to score a Canon 100 - 400mm zoom off Craig's list. I have a couple uses in mind where weight isn't an issue. But for just carrying it around hunting for birds or something... My arms got tired just testing it out in my backyard, and I'm not too thrilled about the prospect of the lens hanging from the body mount while carrying the camera with a camera body mounted neck strap.

I'm looking for alternate ideas to carry this thing. What are any of you folks using for heavy lenses?
I managed to score a Canon 100 - 400mm zoom off Cr... (show quote)


Cotton Carrier, back packs are what I have always used.
PS the 1-4 canon is NOT heavy. A cotton carrier would work great. But, it wimp comes into play, I would strongly suggest a back pack, this would probably be your best option.

Reply
Apr 2, 2024 07:04:41   #
CliffMcKenzie Loc: Lake Athens Texas
 
Let me make one adjustment to the Black Rapid - add a Arca Swiss connector to the end. This allows you the ability to quickly shoot and make the weight more comfortable. I have used two straps it to carry two D850s both with L-brackets. If carrying a long lens (D850+L backet+200-500) the weight is almost 10lbs, be sure to connect to the lens foot.

Reply
Apr 2, 2024 07:18:39   #
CliffMcKenzie Loc: Lake Athens Texas
 
Let me make one adjustment to the Black Rapid - add a Arca Swiss connector to the end. This allows you the ability to quickly shoot and make the weight more comfortable. I have used two straps it to carry two D850s both with L-brackets. If carrying a long lens (D850+L backet+200-500) the weight is almost 10lbs, be sure to connect to the lens foot.

Reply
 
 
Apr 2, 2024 08:31:57   #
ajbrenn Loc: Goshen, IN
 
I used the "cotton carrier" chest with my Sigma 150-600 lens and it worked very well for a heavy lens.

Reply
Apr 2, 2024 08:37:15   #
alberio Loc: Casa Grande AZ
 
stu352 wrote:
I managed to score a Canon 100 - 400mm zoom off Craig's list. I have a couple uses in mind where weight isn't an issue. But for just carrying it around hunting for birds or something... My arms got tired just testing it out in my backyard, and I'm not too thrilled about the prospect of the lens hanging from the body mount while carrying the camera with a camera body mounted neck strap.

I'm looking for alternate ideas to carry this thing. What are any of you folks using for heavy lenses?
I managed to score a Canon 100 - 400mm zoom off Cr... (show quote)

A Sherpa

Reply
Apr 2, 2024 08:38:45   #
Bill_de Loc: US
 
ricardo00 wrote:
I have wondered if wildlife photographers (ie. those using big lenses) have a higher incidence of back injuries (ie. surgeries). Anyone know of any studies and/or statistics?


Why wonder when you can Google?

Then you can look really smart when you provide the statistics to the UHH community.



---

Reply
Apr 2, 2024 08:40:50   #
EJMcD
 
stu352 wrote:
I managed to score a Canon 100 - 400mm zoom off Craig's list. I have a couple uses in mind where weight isn't an issue. But for just carrying it around hunting for birds or something... My arms got tired just testing it out in my backyard, and I'm not too thrilled about the prospect of the lens hanging from the body mount while carrying the camera with a camera body mounted neck strap.

I'm looking for alternate ideas to carry this thing. What are any of you folks using for heavy lenses?
I managed to score a Canon 100 - 400mm zoom off Cr... (show quote)


This is no real answer for you but I'm just adding my two cents to the topic. When shooting youth sports (baseball, football, softball, soccer, etc.) with my 200-500mm, I simply use my hands and arms with a peak design hand strap or "clutch". When/if the weight gets to me, my easy solution is to set the camera and lens down for a few minutes break. I'm 77 years old and it has yet to interfere with or negatively affect my images.

Reply
 
 
Apr 2, 2024 09:20:14   #
Sidwalkastronomy Loc: New Jersey Shore
 
JerryN wrote:
I use a Nikon D500 with a Nikon 200-500(4 1/2lbs) for birding. I got the "Cotton Carrier" chest harness. It uses a clip attached to either the body or the tripod foot. I'm 77 and it makes a big difference in carrying it around. As a plus it leaves the arms/hands free for balance when walking around uneven ground.


I also use the cotton carrier and LOVE it.
I have a Canon 77D rebel and a
tamron 150-600 and it's a dream solution for me. I also have some physical limitations and this makes my life easier. Don't let the price hold you back. It's well made and worth it.

Reply
Apr 2, 2024 09:21:18   #
pithydoug Loc: Catskill Mountains, NY
 
Thomas902 wrote:
"lens hanging from the body mount..." What version? The recent iterations of that Canon optic have a Tripod foot.
Use it as an attachment point.

Also I'm thinking you're in need for many hours in a gym with progressive resistance training
The Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS II USM Lens weighs in at 1640 grams

My Nikon AF-S 70-200mm f/2.8G ED IF VR II Nikkor weighs in at 1627 grams (1540g sans foot)
I shoot Agency Represented "Birds in Flight" all day long using my Black Rapid (Original Version) Strap.
No Problems... I also can hand hold that Nikkor (sans Tripod Foot) for intermittent shooting in my Studio.

BlackRapid 10-Year Anniversary Edition Classic Retro RS-4 Camera Strap (Black)
Available from B&H for $81.95 (currently in stock) you should seriously consider this!
" i lens hanging from the body mount... /i &q... (show quote)


BIF - babe in flight? Hard to see the wings with the long hair. :)

Reply
Apr 2, 2024 09:43:32   #
GLSmith Loc: Tampa, Fl
 
With the Nikon 400 & Nikon 600, I simply attached a monopod to the base of the lens and walked away with it hanging over my shoulder like a fishing pole. Since migrating to the "Z" series, the 600mm is much lighter

Reply
Apr 2, 2024 09:45:39   #
robert43 Loc: Auburn, CA
 
I use this and works great, minus back pack.
https://mrjangear.com/shop/lens-carrier-system/



Reply
Page <prev 2 of 5 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.