Rongnongno wrote:
I looked at 53, 52, 51 and jumped to the first. All the same so, boring, meaningless since there is no progress in the quality. As to the comment on them? Equally, boring, no one seems to care about offering advice on how to improve.
Were you aware that Jim’s images are from the 1970s, so no chance to “improve” technique?
He began by offering these shots as nostalgia, and then tried experimenting with colorization. IMHO he HAS been improving. And the fact that he offers different images as he goes is refreshing.
You are, of course, entitled to your opinion that the images are boring. And I am entitled to my opinion that your criticism is a bit harsh.