AI may be here but we don't have access. Bing, Gemini, and other available chatbots are in training and have training wheels and protective gear on and going very slowly. Microsoft wants $30 per person in business for Co-pilot and if Bing is an indicator they should pay everyone who uses it money to train it. A great assistant must be trustworthy and accurate and if they don't know they will tell you that but will find out right?
DirtFarmer
Loc: Escaped from the NYC area, back to MA
Horseart wrote:
...He replied "Every old barn looks better with a fresh coat of paint." Not saying what I think she might have done but she looked a lot better after that.
As my hair got thinner, I told a guy 'Grass doesn't grow on a busy street'.
He replied 'No need to put a roof on an empty barn'.
It's those turns under the sheets that makes our hair fall off.
Recently my son sent a youtube about Henry Cavill's newest movie which will be a remake of The Highlander. As I went through the still shots of Cavill as The Highlander, I began to question them as authentic as there was something missing that I couldn't quite put my finger on and I asked the question to myself, 'Are these AI?' Then I scrolled down to the comments and sure enough, someone had put this presentation together with AI. What was missing was Cavill's personality. I know that sounds weird, but apparently, AI can't duplicate personality. The pics looked like Cavill yet to anyone who is a big fan, I think they'd see the same thing I saw that was missing.
rpm
Loc: Houston, TX
You know, sometimes I'm glad I'm old... I got everything I came for and I don't want no more... this world is just beginning to move too fast for me. RPM
jlg1000
Loc: Uruguay / South America
rpm wrote:
You know, sometimes I'm glad I'm old... I got everything I came for and I don't want no more... this world is just beginning to move too fast for me. RPM
An interesting point of view... Alas, mine is exactly the opposite: we are reaching the Convergence stage in 40 ~ 60 years ... I'd sell my soul to have more time to see it happening!!
sippyjug104 wrote:
Manipulating an image...? My Better Half spends time before the mirror applying her makeup each time we go somewhere. Could this be considered "Post Processing?" 😁
Nope, it is the equivalent of processing a RAW image. Consider RAW an acronym with you being smart enough to assign flattering initials.
Photo Craig
Been married since there were Super Bowls: XVIII.
DirtFarmer
Loc: Escaped from the NYC area, back to MA
Craig Meyer wrote:
Nope, it is the equivalent of processing a RAW image. Consider RAW an acronym with you being smart enough to assign flattering initials.
Photo Craig
Been married since there were Super Bowls: XVIII.
I think you must mean LVIII.
XVIII is 18.
jerryc41 wrote:
AI is not our friend.
This has to be put into perspective. From a post-processing point of view, AI is definitely our friend. Never has PS and LR been so useful ... at least to me.
jlg1000
Loc: Uruguay / South America
texasdigital wrote:
This has to be put into perspective. From a post-processing point of view, AI is definitely our friend. Never has PS and LR been so useful ... at least to me.
And don't forget that AI is also a *very powerful art creation technique*.
For example, I've created a bunch of these today:
Like I dsaid, beautiful renditions by a computer not by a photographer.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.