Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Sub-Gallery: Birds
How many frames per second do you need? Part 2
Page <prev 2 of 2
Feb 23, 2024 16:13:35   #
Vladimir200 Loc: Beaumont, Ca.
 
ricardo00 wrote:
Don't think it is true of my Z8 but will test it. Do you know if it is true of both the electronic shutter and mechanical shutter on the Canons? And what does it fall to?
Personally, I love the higher fps of the new cameras, I always shoot at 20 fps (the highest I can) with my Nikon Z8 just for the reasons you describe (and had been envious of the higher fps of the Canon).


You can shoot higher than 20 fps if you are willing to go to Jpeg.

Reply
Feb 23, 2024 16:57:25   #
ricardo00
 
Vladimir200 wrote:
You can shoot higher than 20 fps if you are willing to go to Jpeg.


True, but don't like shooting JPG.

Reply
Feb 23, 2024 17:23:16   #
Vladimir200 Loc: Beaumont, Ca.
 
ricardo00 wrote:
True, but don't like shooting JPG.


Understood........

Reply
 
 
Feb 24, 2024 19:26:46   #
CCPhotoist Loc: Cape Cod
 
Great shot.

Reply
Feb 24, 2024 20:00:47   #
Nalu Loc: Southern Arizona
 
ricardo00 wrote:
Does the Sony A1 decrease its FPS as the battery is depleted? If so, how much of the battery has to be depleted before the fps decreases and to what extent?


Actually I don't know. I haven't noticed but typically I shoot with a battery pack and between the two batteries, I never get below 50% of the second once the first is depleted.

Reply
Feb 24, 2024 20:49:30   #
Bubalola Loc: Big Apple, NY
 
bajadreamer wrote:
When someone is shopping for a new camera, one the attributes that is often brought up is the "fps" or frames per second. New cameras have markedly improved frame rates compared to DSLRs just a few years ago. Do you need 60fps or 30fps? That certainly can produce a daunting number of images to sort through at the end of the day. However, what that frame rate also does is to sometimes capture "the" moment. With the increasing emphasis on "action" or "telling a story" in our images, this can mean the difference between a winner and a loser. This image is an example of that. My wife, Deb, shot this image of two Saffron Finches in Brazil last summer. She used a Canon R7, 100-500 mm zoom (at 500 mm), SS 1/1600, ISO 400, f/7.1, EC -0.7 (dark BG and she wanted to avoid blowing out the yellows). This camera is capable of 30 fps (electronic shutter) or 15 fps (mechanical shutter) but when the battery level drops below 50% the fps slows way down; indeed that was the case here.
A millisecond before this frame was shot, both of these finches were singing to each other with their beaks open wide as they belted out their song. Although this is a nice image, if the camera had caught them a millisecond earlier, it would have been a terrific image.
Processed in PS with birds brought slightly up and cropped slightly from top and R.
When someone is shopping for a new camera, one the... (show quote)


Still a wonderful duo, Baja!

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 2
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Sub-Gallery: Birds
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.