Can you spell “DICTATOR “?
Feb 11, 2024 12:44:43 #
Kraken wrote:
That's because the left does not post lies.
You are really going down the rabbit hole with this sort of thinking!! Yikes!!
Feb 11, 2024 12:44:52 #
Racmanaz wrote:
Again, Only Lefty lying loony Cultists would actually think that the Left leaning media doesn't lie. They ALL lie on both sides, it's all about their ratings and money.
When facts are no longer part of reality, you lose.
Feb 11, 2024 14:38:21 #
Wyantry
Loc: SW Colorado
McKinneyMike wrote:
Normal people and Merriam Webster associate Dictators with Putin, Hitler, Trump.
Yah, except der Trumpmeister DOES NOT FIT the definition. (Not enough actual Control).
Nice try.
Thanks for playing.
Check out Travel Photography - Tips and More section of our forum.
Feb 11, 2024 15:09:55 #
Racmanaz
Loc: Sunny Tucson!
McKinneyMike wrote:
When facts are no longer part of reality, you lose.
Again, Only Lefty lying loony Cultists would actually think that the Left leaning media doesn't lie. They ALL lie on both sides, it's all about their ratings and money. To deny that is to deny facts and truth.
Feb 11, 2024 15:11:30 #
Wyantry
Loc: SW Colorado
BobHartung wrote:
Try saying something intelligent.
I am not sure that he CAN.
Kraken has a conceptual problem: an inability to provide basic information about the ‘rating-service’ he continually references. (https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/), founded by David VanZandt, who participates in the review process, and the Huitsing fellow, one of the reviewers.
This would not be a great problem if there was some scientific rationale behind the reviews and if there were some assurance the “reviewers” are not biased.
”Writers at the Poynter Institute, which develops PolitiFact, have stated that ‘Media Bias/Fact Check is a widely cited source for news stories and even studies about misinformation, despite the fact that its method is in no way scientific.’
In 2018, a writer in the Columbia Journalism Review described Media Bias/Fact Check as "an armchair media analysis" and characterized their assessments as "subjective assessments [that] leave room for human biases, or even simple inconsistencies, to creep in".
A study published in Scientific Reports wrote: "While [Media Bias/Fact Check's] credibility is sometimes questioned, it has been regarded as accurate enough to be used as ground-truth for e.g. media bias classifiers, fake news studies, and automatic fact-checking systems."[/b]
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Media_Bias/Fact_Check#Methodology
Feb 11, 2024 15:15:21 #
Kraken wrote:
Overall, we rate Fox News right biased based on editorial positions that align with the right and Questionable due to the promotion of propaganda, conspiracy theories, pseudoscience, the use of poor sources, and numerous false claims and failed fact checks. Straight news reporting from beat reporters is generally fact-based and accurate, which earns them a Mixed factual rating. (7/19/2016) Updated (M. Huitsing 04/26/2023)
Who is "we"?
Feb 11, 2024 15:19:29 #
Wyantry
Loc: SW Colorado
rcarol wrote:
Who is "we"?
Kraken NEVER PROVIDES the “We” information. Which happens to be https://mediabiasfactcheck.com.
Founded by David VanZandt. One of the reviewers is Mr. Huitsing.
Check out Panorama section of our forum.
Feb 11, 2024 15:25:32 #
Feb 11, 2024 15:28:29 #
Wyantry wrote:
Kraken NEVER PROVIDES the “We” information. Which happens to be https://mediabiasfactcheck.com.
Founded by David VanZandt. One of the reviewers is Mr. Huitsing.
Founded by David VanZandt. One of the reviewers is Mr. Huitsing.
Are you guys so thick between the ears that you can't figure out who we is?
I'll give you a clue, I am not one of them.
Feb 11, 2024 15:35:46 #
McKinneyMike wrote:
When facts are no longer part of reality, you lose.
Dealing with your tainted, illogical reality” is a challenge most of us don’t want to waste time with.
Feb 11, 2024 15:49:56 #
Wyantry
Loc: SW Colorado
Kraken wrote:
Are you guys so thick between the ears that you can't figure out who we is?
I'll give you a clue, I am not one of them.
I'll give you a clue, I am not one of them.
And it would be possible to avoid criticism very easily by simply providing the reference to https://mediabiasfactcheck.com as well as the reviewers name. (e.g. VanZandt, Huitsing, &c.).
Check out Film Photography section of our forum.
Feb 11, 2024 16:14:24 #
Feb 11, 2024 18:53:43 #
Kraken wrote:
Are you guys so thick between the ears that you can't figure out who we is?
I'll give you a clue, I am not one of them.
I'll give you a clue, I am not one of them.
I had no idea of who the f__k ‘we’ is.
Feb 11, 2024 18:55:09 #
Feb 11, 2024 19:03:35 #
rcarol wrote:
Apparently.
Lol! For quite some time Krak has been making these posts and originally he would provide sources, but it became so commonplace that the redundancy was unnecessary. Of course there are some that have poor memories or simply feel like whining.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out The Pampered Pets Corner section of our forum.