Steve Perry Video
Jan 31, 2024 10:33:23 #
Steve Perry has a new video about how to make ISO 12,800 look like ISO 400. That email made me smile. Remember when we tried to avoid using 400 ASA film because it was too grainy? I preferred 32 or 125. Now, 400 is considered good. Our grandchildren will think that ISO 1,000 is slow. 
It's the best 45 minutes you'll spend on post processing! (Steve)
It's the best 45 minutes you'll spend on post processing! (Steve)
Jan 31, 2024 10:40:51 #
Jan 31, 2024 11:00:52 #
jerryc41 wrote:
Steve Perry has a new video about how to make ISO 12,800 look like ISO 400. That email made me smile. Remember when we tried to avoid using 400 ASA film because it was too grainy? I preferred 32 or 125. Now, 400 is considered good. Our grandchildren will think that ISO 1,000 is slow.
It's the best 45 minutes you'll spend on post processing! (Steve)
It's the best 45 minutes you'll spend on post processing! (Steve)
Link please, I didn't get the email.
Found it....https://youtu.be/NMYh5grOBa0?si=4Pu579NwqLtDVrs7
Jan 31, 2024 11:36:40 #
frankraney wrote:
If I had posted a link, the thread would have been moved to Never Never Land - "Links."
Jan 31, 2024 12:32:40 #
jerryc41 wrote:
If I had posted a link, the thread would have been moved to Never Never Land - "Links."
FYI LongShadow posted a link this morning and it was in this section. For some reason if you just post the link itself without commentary it seems to work.
Jan 31, 2024 12:38:51 #
Fredrick wrote:
FYI LongShadow posted a link this morning and it was in this section. For some reason if you just post the link itself without commentary it seems to work.
Don't post the link in the first post of the thread. Add it in the second post, with or without text.
Jan 31, 2024 12:46:03 #
R.G. wrote:
Don't post the link in the first post of the thread. Add it in the second post, with or without text.
Why not just post everything with links in the (wait for it) links section.
If everybody did that it wouldn't be an issue, and the links section could become useful.
---
Jan 31, 2024 14:01:09 #
Bill_de wrote:
Why not just post everything with links in the (wait for it) links section.....
Viewing figures.
Jan 31, 2024 18:38:39 #
Bill_de wrote:
Why not just post everything with links in the (wait for it) links section.
If everybody did that it wouldn't be an issue, and the links section could become useful.
---
If everybody did that it wouldn't be an issue, and the links section could become useful.
---
Well, I did that earlier...I don't think a lot of people have that on their watch lists.
Jan 31, 2024 18:40:52 #
Bill_de wrote:
Why not just post everything with links in the (wait for it) links section.
If everybody did that it wouldn't be an issue, and the links section could become useful.
---
If everybody did that it wouldn't be an issue, and the links section could become useful.
---
Everybody* doesn't have links in their subscribed sections.
* Me
Feb 1, 2024 05:51:56 #
jerryc41 wrote:
Steve Perry has a new video about how to make ISO 12,800 look like ISO 400. That email made me smile. Remember when we tried to avoid using 400 ASA film because it was too grainy? I preferred 32 or 125. Now, 400 is considered good. Our grandchildren will think that ISO 1,000 is slow.
It's the best 45 minutes you'll spend on post processing! (Steve)
It's the best 45 minutes you'll spend on post processing! (Steve)
Jerry you really brought back some memories on that. My go to film was Plus-X ASA 40 for B/W and then Kodachrome ASA 25 for color. If I was shooting a sporting event I would use Tri-X ASA 400 and using a method called Stand Processing you could push it to about 6400 ASA.
Feb 1, 2024 07:32:27 #
Bill_de wrote:
Why not just post everything with links in the (wait for it) links section.
If everybody did that it wouldn't be an issue, and the links section could become useful.
---
If everybody did that it wouldn't be an issue, and the links section could become useful.
---
The Links section get almost no traffic. I made the mistake of posting a link in Main, and it was moved to Links. There were no replies to the post after that.
Even more useful would be allowing links in the Main section when a link would be appropriate. Maybe we need a new section: "Main with No Links, but Links are Required." 😂
Feb 1, 2024 08:36:20 #
jerryc41 wrote:
Steve Perry has a new video about how to make ISO 12,800 look like ISO 400. That email made me smile. Remember when we tried to avoid using 400 ASA film because it was too grainy? I preferred 32 or 125. Now, 400 is considered good. Our grandchildren will think that ISO 1,000 is slow.
It's the best 45 minutes you'll spend on post processing! (Steve)
It's the best 45 minutes you'll spend on post processing! (Steve)
I have quite a few good ones that are 12,800. With many of the denoise tools, one can create an outstanding photo. If as you said in a diffrrent post, you prefer SOOC then you paint yourself into distant dark corner. By the way 1,000 is nothing today much less our grandkids. Youmay be a generation behind. Average pics are 2,000-4,000 with minimal editing. This is one of reasons that most of pros especially actioj shots like to use manual and auto ISO - they can concetrate on composition while shooting rather than fondling the ISO setting, short of an EV setting.
Feb 1, 2024 08:40:14 #
jerryc41 wrote:
...Even more useful would be allowing links in the Main section when a link would be appropriate. ...
Feb 1, 2024 08:49:51 #
pithydoug wrote:
I have quite a few good ones that are 12,800. With... (show quote)
Yes, cameras have come a long way since the 1960s. I don't hesitate to crank up the ISO.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.