Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Lighting: natural or artificial? What's your preferred source/method and why?
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
Jan 24, 2024 03:50:27   #
tradio Loc: Oxford, Ohio
 
Linda From Maine wrote:
I search for interesting natural light (and weather). It's what inspires me most to take the shot.


Closing Time by Linda Shorey, on Flickr

light and shadow by Linda Shorey, on Flickr


pond scene
by Linda Shorey, on Flickr

Wild Morning Glory by Linda Shorey, on Flickr

.
I i b search for /b /i interesting natural lig... (show quote)


Very nice shots.

Reply
Jan 24, 2024 05:48:19   #
DavidM Loc: New Orleans, LA
 
JZA B1 wrote:
Some photographers seem to only use natural lighting (with or without reflectors). Others seem to rely mostly on flash with light modifiers.

I notice this with both indoor and outdoor photography.

Sometimes I see examples of portraits shot with just window light. Looks great. But hard to pull off right.

I also see examples of outdoor shots with fill light with many different flash heads. And results are often amazing.

What's your preferred way? Care to share any advice?
Some photographers seem to only use natural lighti... (show quote)


For indoor family events I use a bounce flash with bounce card. This will help brighten faces and add catch lights in the eyes. I also do this outside at family events for the same reason as well as add a reflector if not doing run and gun shots. Below is one example..


(Download)

Reply
Jan 24, 2024 06:17:46   #
camerapapi Loc: Miami, Fl.
 
JZA B1 wrote: "Some photographers seem to only use natural lighting."

The fact is that the majority of photographers tend to use natural light. Flash, in studio and outdoors makes beautiful images but the operator needs to know what he or she is doing. Flash means harsh light so most of the time a light modifier needs to be used. Indoor bouncing the flash is a very popular technique and when properly done the image as a result is beautiful without evidence that flash was used. Studio light they all have light modifiers to make the light softer on the subject.

I like using flash but like others here I do not use it very often although I should. Outdoor portraits in a majority of the cases benefit from using fill-in flash to soften the shadow areas. Outdoors using off camera flash with an umbrella works beautifully for portraits.
Flash is an important accessory but the operator needs to understand how to use it for outstanding results.

Reply
 
 
Jan 24, 2024 06:39:09   #
Linda From Maine Loc: Yakima, Washington
 
tradio wrote:
Very nice shots.
Thanks very much!

Reply
Jan 24, 2024 07:31:30   #
billnikon Loc: Pennsylvania/Ohio/Florida/Maui/Oregon/Vermont
 
JZA B1 wrote:
Some photographers seem to only use natural lighting (with or without reflectors). Others seem to rely mostly on flash with light modifiers.

I notice this with both indoor and outdoor photography.

Sometimes I see examples of portraits shot with just window light. Looks great. But hard to pull off right.

I also see examples of outdoor shots with fill light with many different flash heads. And results are often amazing.

What's your preferred way? Care to share any advice?
Some photographers seem to only use natural lighti... (show quote)


For outside I only use reflectasols to bounce light back on my subject. I use white, gold and silver depending on the model.

Reply
Jan 24, 2024 09:15:31   #
raymondh Loc: Walker, MI
 
[quote=Linda From Maine]I search for interesting natural light (and weather). It's what inspires me most to take .

These are truly first class images! So what percentage of post processing would you attribute to the quality of these shots? I’d be hard pressed to believe that these are 100% SOOC.

Reply
Jan 24, 2024 09:17:01   #
tcthome Loc: NJ
 
Linda From Maine wrote:
I search for interesting natural light (and weather). It's what inspires me most to take the shot.


Closing Time by Linda Shorey, on Flickr

light and shadow by Linda Shorey, on Flickr


pond scene
by Linda Shorey, on Flickr

Wild Morning Glory by Linda Shorey, on Flickr

.
I i b search for /b /i interesting natural lig... (show quote)


Beauties!

Reply
 
 
Jan 24, 2024 09:17:23   #
tcthome Loc: NJ
 
imagextrordinair wrote:
Natural light, aka "sun light" can work well in the right situation, perhaps better than studio lighting at times...


Very nice work!

Reply
Jan 24, 2024 09:56:44   #
mikegreenwald Loc: Illinois
 
MJPerini wrote:
With all due respect, you are asking the wrong question. Every accomplished photographer learns that it is the picture that is important. Pictures occur everywhere you need to be able to Get the picture. That means knowing how to add light when necessary. It is totally fine to have a preference for natural light , or studio light but you will invariably find some situations where you are out of your comfort zone.
Raising ISO is not a substitute for good lighting. It can certainly help and we all use it sometimes. But most times a lower iso and a reflector will give better results
If you love studio lighting and find yourself out of the studio? Add a little flash, turn the subject if you can , or change your position.

People with strong opinions about doing it only one way, are often uncomfortable in their ability to modify light to get the picture.
Personally I do lots of natural light photography, but i always carry a reflector and a small flash and 5 or 10% of the time they make the picture.
I started as a studio photographer. If the picture is good , the picture is good…. We don’t first ask what type of lighting is “better”.

Good photographers are problem solvers in search of good pictures.
There certainly are times when you can’t add light or use a reflector say bird or wildlife photography, but if you look at the work of people who are good at that work you will quickly see that they have Positioned themselves relative to the subject and light to give the best chance. That is very much a lighting skill.
This is a long answer to what seemed a simple question, it is offered in an effort to be responsive to the intent of your question.
Good Luck
With all due respect, you are asking the wrong que... (show quote)


Well said!!

Reply
Jan 24, 2024 10:00:05   #
gvarner Loc: Central Oregon Coast
 
Depends on the subject and how you want the photo to come out.

Reply
Jan 24, 2024 10:03:10   #
Dikdik Loc: Winnipeg, Canada
 
I'm not a pro... I don't have a studio, but, I prefer natural lighting and use artificial lighting to 'correct' for any shadows, etc.

Reply
 
 
Jan 24, 2024 11:45:00   #
Randyfrieder Loc: Long Island, New York
 
I am a professional photographer, shooting weddings, events and live music.

I use flash often.
Preferably, only for the weddings and events.
When shooting live music and musicians, I try to avoid using any of my lights, so as to be able to capture the effect lighting on the talent(s).

Most of the venues I work in, are lit so poorly, that people use their phone’s light, to see or read anything.
To make matters worse, the ceilings are usually painted black.

Since there isn’t enough light to get a properly exposed image, I need to supply my own.
I use promediagear boomerangs, (BBX and BBG’s) for better lighting than if the light were to be mounted in the hotshoe.
I will supplement that flash with stand mounted lights, as needed.

FTR:
I refer to using my flash gear,
as shooting with
“available light”
Because…
it is always available!

IMHO
Ymmv
📸 Regards, Randy 📸

Reply
Jan 24, 2024 12:40:58   #
Linda From Maine Loc: Yakima, Washington
 
raymondh wrote:
These are truly first class images! So what percentage of post processing would you attribute to the quality of these shots? I’d be hard pressed to believe that these are 100% SOOC.
I have not practiced SOOC since color transparency/slide film circa 1990 I have been shooting in raw and editing to my vision for 10 or 11 years.

What is your definition of quality? Would your enjoyment of these pics be lessened if you knew I'd worked on them in Nik Collection and PS Elements?

These four are examples of my attraction to the quality of the light. That was the start: how the light affected those subjects. A large percentage of my photos have high contrast and/or are shot in low angle of sun. It's my favorite way to enjoy the hobby!

#1 has the most creative processing (a filter from Topaz Studio 2). The sunlight on the red and chrome was wonderful!

#2 has a lot of manipulation of blacks and whites, and cloning. The assignment for an online group was "Shadows." I'd never looked at that scene in that way before, though I walked past it often.

#3 has some cloning of junk on the water, and color enhancement. Note how the sun was hitting just the top half of the plants and that open blossom. That's why I took the photo.

#4 started with a deeply shadowed background and a single sunlit flower. It has additional adjustments of tones + dodging and burning (learned in b&w film class) via Nik Silver Efex.

Many thanks for your comments and interest!

Reply
Jan 24, 2024 12:41:16   #
Linda From Maine Loc: Yakima, Washington
 
tcthome wrote:
Beauties!
Thanks!

Reply
Jan 24, 2024 13:04:52   #
M1911 Loc: DFW Metromess
 
I use available light. Sun,moon, flash, matches, candles, any damn light that is available.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.