Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
How do you approach composition in your photography?
Page <<first <prev 6 of 19 next> last>>
Jan 20, 2024 10:20:20   #
Bohica Loc: SE Coast of NC
 
Staryed using rule of thirds with film 50+ years ago and it just carried over to Digital

Reply
Jan 20, 2024 10:45:49   #
dustie Loc: Nose to the grindstone
 
If the picture taker concentrated composition attention on rule(s) perfection, and worked to make rule(s) really obvious in the picture, and succeeded, maybe the picture only turned to out to be the illustration of the rule(s), nothing more.

Reply
Jan 20, 2024 10:47:22   #
whatdat Loc: Del Valle, Tx.
 
adedeluca wrote:
Yes I always look around myself and picture beauty as it seen by my eyes

When it look good a press the shutter


đź‘Ťđź‘Ť

Reply
 
 
Jan 20, 2024 10:48:54   #
dustie Loc: Nose to the grindstone
 
Quote:
SuperflyTNT wrote:
... Where I think the “rules” have some validity is for newer photographers and those with no art background. Not so much that they look through the viewfinder and think about what rules to be apply, but that they learn to look at a photo and understand what makes it “look right” so that when they’re shooting they learn to look instead of just centering the subject and snapping away.

Cany143 wrote: "LOOKS RIGHT". 'Plain and Simple' (for those who find themselves in the 'plain and simple' camp) or 'Order out of Chaos' (for those who subscribe to a more rationalized approach); choose either of these and if you haven't already done so, you'll begin to understand not only what composition is, more importantly you'll begin to understand the purposes and functions --and uses-- of composition writ large.

And the purposes, functions and uses of composition will never be understood until one first recognizes that the placement of elements in an image --and how those elements interact with/affect/mirror/oppose/define or even serve to negate one another should that be the composer's aim-- is precisely what makes a composition. Similarly, the purposes, functions and interactions of elements will never be understood until one first recognizes that things and objects are not merely objects and things; they're the stuff of stuff that can be ranked, have levels of importance or otherwise, of relevance and irrelevance in the ways that all things are ultimately connected, and that (to use an analogy, not knowing a better way to state it briefly) that music is not sound: music is sound AND silence that has been appropriately (i.e., RIGHTLY) placed. And as well, that color --its value, its tone-- is an element as much as a square or round or triangularly shaped 'object' is within a given space, and where and how it's placed matters, too. So to repeat, composition is how each of those elements 'relate' to one another, and that is what the basis of a composition actually is.
SuperflyTNT wrote: br ... Where I think the “rules... (show quote)


Linda From Maine wrote:
One succinct response, one detailed. Together, Superfly's and Cany's postings are absolutely the best advice a novice will ever receive on Ugly Hedgehog regarding composition.


đź‘Ť đź‘Ť đź‘Ť

There are others who have mentioned aspects of these two posts, in prior comments and threads, but if the advice gets intermingled with weeds, it may just lead to a novice out tangled in the weeds.

Reply
Jan 20, 2024 10:49:23   #
yssirk123 Loc: New Jersey
 
billnikon wrote:
I generally think about composition rules .......
Good luck and keep on shooting until the end. And remember my favorite rule, KEEP IT SIMPLE STUPID.
I do love leading lines.


Gorgeous images Bill - nicely captured!

Reply
Jan 20, 2024 11:20:43   #
mindzye Loc: WV
 
JZA B1 wrote:
Square crop, rule of thirds, or something completely different?

How do you know which one to apply in any given situation? Any time-tested rules or just what looks best?


In short, practice, practice. In the long run, study some of the great photographers - of all ages. Are you drawn to landscapes, florals, candid group images, studio, street/ personal points of interest; clear precise focusing, or more of an impressionistic type of approach - minimalism and/ or macro? Cityscapes with interesting geometrics and lines - weather related / environmental - documentary? Your personal tastes will evolve.

There are some excellent examples of these areas here on UHH, from environmental to city/ landscapes to florals to animals in environment, to b&w to street scenes.. There are also lots of simply images of record.
Learn to be able to justify your opinion on the differences, which will need the ability to change your mind with new and updated factual information, time and experience - caution of 'moire' opinions.

Learn your camera; experience along with study will guide you.

Learn the rules of composition, and then forget them. In another field of interest it was encouraged to learn the information and then forget it. The information come to the fore when needed. Learn to trust what feels good to you in an image. Your opinion of your own work will change with learning as to just what is a compelling image; your evolvement in photography. Let your innate come through.

Are you interested in picture perfect (sharpness is a requirement on some -a lot of - applications), or an image that draws an emotion; or simply one that encourages you to keep looking at it - a quality of a great image.
Again, several photographers here have this capability. Seek out what 'jazzes' you and work in this area. It will come; learn what works for you, and what doesn't. Be critical of your work, but not toooo critical, as this perspective will either encourage or discourage the desire to move forward.
Hopefully you'll learn to stretch your vision and capabilities.

Keep in mind that a technically perfect sharp image that is boring is a perfectly boring picture;
a perfect image of record.

Yet in all of this let the passion of this art form propel you and motivate you to 'just get out there' and shoot.
In time you will find if you need to crop, to the single focal point of your image, or if the whole of an image gives the focal point of interest room to breathe within it's environment - telling the 'rest of the story'.
When you may want a 'square' presentation or full ratio of the image - you will begin to question what format is required, or just leave the heck alone - keeping in mind this takes study of this approach to detect when this would benefit your image. When this occurs, you will know you're on your way in advancing your compositional skills.

And when you get that first image of 'ok, this is different', and you get excited with what you produced, you'll know you're on your way. The bug has taken root. Annd, well, it's Katy Bar the Door after that.

If desired, post here and get some insight from critique - from Knowledgeable photographers. There are a few very good and experienced professionals here- from studio to landscape/ animals kingdom, documentary, cityscapes. And some Very good, impassioned and motivated photographers - the same direction as above - that are here simply for the love of the image - ok, and the adventure!! :] And talking about the craft. And like family we often argue. Deal widit.

Above all, seek the lighting. All the rest, although important, is secondary. Disclaimer; Documentary and reporting may very well not be secondary - Story telling is the highpoint. whew, 'bout got myself into an argument here..

The structures of composition and tonalities of compelling black and white images makes for compelling color images - learning to see what makes it compelling will aid you in color images. Learning how to adjust settings for good slides garnered me a whole lot of experience in b&w and color - types and manufacturers of film as well. It's all a learning curve.

Post processing is a whole 'nother conversation.

You might search the internet for videos on photography composition. One of my current interests are from a guy who travels NC Europe; Mads Peter Iverson. You might also consider some publications from Bruce Peterson, Moose Peterson, the late Vivian Maier's work, and of course Ansel Adams, John Gerlach.

A suggestion is to find your path of interest, and, well, pursue it. It's a very rewarding journey. Best of luck to you.

Reply
Jan 20, 2024 11:27:49   #
JBuckley
 
Exactly.

So often, the (view) or picture that I stumble into, has all the right ingredients to the scene that first, caused me to “gasp” at a wonderful scene.
All the elements of composing the shot stream into my brain, but I know that later on, when I look at the photo, that there were several great pictures (in one shot)! By taking a wider shot, I can (reframe) all or parts of my first photo and improve it, or make several wonderful captures out of the original.

In other words, I might have only seen (the second best), view when snapping the shutter.

Sometimes our eye only sees what our first impressions were in a hurry to see.

[like a second opinion] from another part of our brains.

Reply
 
 
Jan 20, 2024 12:41:09   #
E.L.. Shapiro Loc: Ottawa, Ontario Canada
 
Too many folks go to extremes- stick to the rules! vs. forget about the rule!- it kida silly. Like lots of other things in photography- differet camers, filters, various kinds of lighing hear, differet techniques- there is a time and a place for most logical things, methods and techniques. You are the final arbiter of your methodology so it is wise to utulize whatever you can to perfect your work and enjoy the results.

If you are photographing a bird in flight, a high-speed athletic event, or motorsport, you are not gonna refer to a diagram, read a book, or worry about rules- you will shoot instinctively. If, however, you have studied, practiced, and successfully mastered some of the foundational principles of composition, you will put some of these techniques into play in split seconds. You might leave sufficient negative space in front or in the back of the subject to illustrate movement and direction. You will know how to direct the viewers' eyes to the motif of your images. You can tell the story! You will not only change focal lengths to bring things in closer or encompass a wider view but to create, exaggerate, or compress leading lines.

Some photographers are indeed "artists" but we are not painters. We can not always change every element of any scene or subject to arrive at our final statement or story as we perceive it. We often have to capture a scene, event, or expression in a split second. When effective composition becomes a kind of muscle memory, your results will be more satisfying.

Reply
Jan 20, 2024 12:48:01   #
Delderby Loc: Derby UK
 
gvarner wrote:
Work the scene to envision what you want the end result to be. Make the photo instead of just taking the photo.


I'm not sure what you mean by "work the scene". Are you suggesting PP and/or AI to produce a fantasy rather than actuality?

Reply
Jan 20, 2024 13:15:40   #
terryMc Loc: Arizona's White Mountains
 
Delderby wrote:
I'm not sure what you mean by "work the scene". Are you suggesting PP and/or AI to produce a fantasy rather than actuality?


Fantasy rather than reality? What does that even mean?

Reply
Jan 20, 2024 13:20:44   #
DirtFarmer Loc: Escaped from the NYC area, back to MA
 
Delderby wrote:
I'm not sure what you mean by "work the scene". Are you suggesting PP and/or AI to produce a fantasy rather than actuality?


As I have always understood it, 'work the scene' means to take photos of the scene, using as many different views as give good results. Has nothing to do with PP. And PP/AI does NOT imply fantasy rather than actuality.

Reply
 
 
Jan 20, 2024 13:25:09   #
bonjac Loc: Santa Ynez, CA 93460
 
When I like what I see and how I see it, I shoot. Composition is in my minds eye.

Reply
Jan 20, 2024 13:26:24   #
BobHartung Loc: Bettendorf, IA
 
JZA B1 wrote:
Square crop, rule of thirds, or something completely different?

How do you know which one to apply in any given situation? Any time-tested rules or just what looks best?


Gestalt!

Reply
Jan 20, 2024 13:27:55   #
SuperflyTNT Loc: Manassas VA
 
R.G. wrote:
Leading lines and clear channels lead the eye into the shot and add to the sense of depth. That applies even if the areas that the eye is being led to lead to aren't particularly attention-grabbing on their own.

PS - Any similarity to rule of thirds etc is purely coincidental.
.


Actually rather than similarity to the rule of thirds, some would complain that the horizon is right in the middle.

Reply
Jan 20, 2024 13:29:32   #
MrBob Loc: lookout Mtn. NE Alabama
 
DirtFarmer wrote:
As I have always understood it, 'work the scene' means to take photos of the scene, using as many different views as give good results. Has nothing to do with PP. And PP/AI does NOT imply fantasy rather than actuality.


I always thought " Work the Scene " meant taking your time to look at the scene from all angles and perspectives... Look at where the light is, check angles and DOF, focus points, scenes within a scene... etc. The MORE one looks, the MORE one sees.... Take your time. I totally agree with you.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 6 of 19 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.