Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
The Attic
Bad Decision
Page <<first <prev 3 of 4 next>
Dec 24, 2023 16:39:17   #
Blurryeyed Loc: NC Mountains.
 
jerryc41 wrote:
I just read this in the Boston Globe. An Army reservist shot and killed eighteen people at a bowling alley and bar. Police in Maine knew he was unstable, but they didn't want to confront him. A fellow reservist contacted the police and told them that he had threatened to do a mass shooting. The police didn't want to "throw dynamite into a pool of gasoline," so they did nothing. "Reamer also voiced concern about the safety of law enforcement officers if they made further attempts to ensure Card did not pose a threat."

After all those people were killed, the official report found that "the deputies acted appropriately 'under the totality of the circumstances.'"

"A crazy man says he's going to do a mass shooting. We don't want to confront him and make the situation worse. Let's wait and see what happens."
I just read this in the Boston Globe. An Army res... (show quote)


I support the second, not just for hunting but also for self-defense however I also support Red Flag laws in all 50 states.

Reply
Dec 24, 2023 16:47:35   #
pendennis
 
Dannj wrote:
What are the odds of a mass killing by someone with a club as opposed to someone with a rifle of any kind…single shot, semi-automatic, automatic, whatever?


One of the worst mass killings occurred in Bath, Michigan. The murderer killed 45, including himself, using dynamite.

To carry your comment to its ultimate. Anyone with a single shot weapon is king when everyone else is unarmed.

Reply
Dec 24, 2023 16:52:51   #
pendennis
 
apacs1 wrote:
Your last statement says it all. For your information, I have been a Republican for almost 60 years. Because you say the fact that the US has more guns than people is irrelevant doesn't make it so. It just shows your stupidity. Don't bother answering because I won't red (sic) your response.


Just in case you cheat - Frankly, I couldn't give a crap less about your affiliation. You may be a "Republican" by title, but you sure aren't one by belief. You don't believe in the Constitution; only your fairy tale beliefs about guns, which you obviously know little, to none of.

It also helps if you know the difference between red (the color), and read (past tense of read).

Reply
 
 
Dec 24, 2023 16:56:30   #
pendennis
 
Texcaster wrote:
Slowing the shooting rate down always seems to be a 'woke' side issue with some. Legal ownership of all semi-auto, self loading firearms should be very tightly controlled. Not everyone qualifies for legal possession of this class of weapon. How is anyone's 2nd amendment rights being thwarted by controls on this class of weapon?


You would have everyone go back to flintlocks, if you had your way.

BTW - self-loaders are not the be all, end all. I know revolver aficionados who can out-shoot semiautomatics with their wheel guns. You're beguiled by mythology.

Reply
Dec 24, 2023 17:02:28   #
pendennis
 
apacs1 wrote:
You just proved my point. You're a moron. Signing off. You're on my ignore list. Have a good life.


So you did cheat. Figured as much.

Reply
Dec 24, 2023 17:18:34   #
Texcaster Loc: Queensland
 
pendennis wrote:
You would have everyone go back to flintlocks, if you had your way.

BTW - self-loaders are not the be all, end all. I know revolver aficionados who can out-shoot semiautomatics with their wheel guns. You're beguiled by mythology.


No flintlock! No flintlock! You're the flintlock! You're the flintlock! (sorry just TDS, it's the season!) Pump and lever action firearms still provide plenty of protection from bears and 'bad guys' and no one's 2nd gets stepped on.

btw - I know about those people too. They're skilled shooters. Semi-auto gives every low skill chimp awesome firepower. Dylan Roof comes to mind.

Reply
Dec 24, 2023 20:00:37   #
Dannj
 
Texcaster wrote:
Slowing the shooting rate down always seems to be a 'woke' side issue with some. Legal ownership of all semi-auto, self loading firearms should be very tightly controlled. Not everyone qualifies for legal possession of this class of weapon. How is anyone's 2nd amendment rights being thwarted by tight controls on this class of weapon?


I’ll answer your question by saying no one’s rights are thwarted by tight controls but my question was directed to the person who made the “club” argument.

Reply
 
 
Dec 24, 2023 20:34:24   #
Scruples Loc: Brooklyn, New York
 
Daryls wrote:
Yes Scruples, close, maybe even on the line, but not over.

Always Living on The Edge!

Daryl


While we may have thoughts be extremely careful.

I gave my opinion once here on the forum. Then unbeknownst to my wife and family, the Admin had grabbed me by the ankles. I was dragged to the door and heard it creak open. I was dragged up the 39 stairs to a very dark place. I had counted each stair as the back of my head landed upon it. Then inside Attic I shouted for help. No one came. I heard my faithful dog scratch at the door but could not open. My eyes adjusted to the darkness. Plenty of cobwebs and I was afraid to crawl around. I was sure a very large arachnid might find me very appetizing. As time passed, I drew silent and just listened to nearby sounds to determine where I was. I was in the Infamous Attic that I had heard so much about but dared not visit this dark and musty place. After a time of which I was not sure, I called out and apologized for my wayward outburst. The rather authoritarian voice on the other side confirmed my sincerity. I have yet to issue any opinion that defers from photography and hope that I will remain in The Admin’s favor.
Please heed my warning! The Attic is a place I dare not go again.

Reply
Dec 24, 2023 21:00:03   #
thom w Loc: San Jose, CA
 
pendennis wrote:
One of the worst mass killings occurred in Bath, Michigan. The murderer killed 45, including himself, using dynamite.

To carry your comment to its ultimate. Anyone with a single shot weapon is king when everyone else is unarmed.


Only until he fires it.

Reply
Dec 25, 2023 09:17:26   #
jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY
 
Scruples wrote:
Be extremely careful here. This thread could end up in The Attic!
I shall PM you for further thoughts dear friend.


Your prediction came true, unfortunately. Now, I'll click on "Unwatch."

Reply
Dec 25, 2023 12:11:50   #
Scruples Loc: Brooklyn, New York
 
jerryc41 wrote:
Your prediction came true, unfortunately. Now, I'll click on "Unwatch."


I never mind the hearty banter of two friends discussing a topic while chowing down on a good meal. I hope that other will learn from my past mistakes. For those new to the forum, I will admit that I embellished my experience. I did my best to elucidate my first and only adventure with the Forum Admin. I am grateful he/she was not as harsh. If you feel the need to offer your opinion, don’t!
Instead private message your fellow Hogger. That way one person can agree or disagree with you at a time.

Reply
 
 
Dec 25, 2023 12:14:11   #
Scruples Loc: Brooklyn, New York
 
I never mind the hearty banter of two friends discussing a topic while chowing down on a good meal. I hope that other will learn from my past mistakes. For those new to the forum, I will admit that I embellished my experience. I did my best to elucidate my first and only adventure with the Forum Admin. I am grateful he/she was not as harsh. If you feel the need to offer your opinion, don’t!
Instead private message your fellow Hogger. That way one person can agree or disagree with you at a time. Incidentally, this was the exact same topic that had me banished to the Attic. I love to reminisce but not over my past foolishness.

Reply
Dec 25, 2023 14:26:16   #
Dannj
 
Texcaster wrote:
Slowing the shooting rate down always seems to be a 'woke' side issue with some. Legal ownership of all semi-auto, self loading firearms should be very tightly controlled. Not everyone qualifies for legal possession of this class of weapon. How is anyone's 2nd amendment rights being thwarted by tight controls on this class of weapon?


Their rights are not thwarted at all by tight controls…but what does that have to do with my question? I was responding to a comment from pendennis.

Reply
Dec 25, 2023 16:42:02   #
pendennis
 
Dannj wrote:
I’ll answer your question by saying no one’s rights are thwarted by tight controls but my question was directed to the person who made the “club” argument.


Just who is the authority who maintains the "tight controls" of which you write? If you allow the government, at any level to define those controls, then it's only a matter of time before those controls become a total ban. Not to be trite, but "power corrupts, and...".

Rights limitations are always best defined by the wielder of those rights, and we have plenty of laws which can be used to punish those who flout those laws.

Here's an interesting aside: Class III weapons (submachine guns, machine guns. fully automatic rifles, sawed-off shotguns, etc.) are all tightly controlled by the ATF, and you must have those weapons registered with them, and you must also have those weapons registered locally (sheriff, PD, etc.). The folks who own those not only pay the licensing fees, but the cost of those weapons is extremely high. The price of those guns starts at around $10K, and rises rapidly from there.

The only reported incident of which I'm aware, was a murder committed by a Dayton, OH, police officer who legally owned the weapon.

Reply
Dec 25, 2023 19:34:46   #
Dannj
 
pendennis wrote:
Just who is the authority who maintains the "tight controls" of which you write? If you allow the government, at any level to define those controls, then it's only a matter of time before those controls become a total ban. Not to be trite, but "power corrupts, and...".

Rights limitations are always best defined by the wielder of those rights, and we have plenty of laws which can be used to punish those who flout those laws.

Here's an interesting aside: Class III weapons (submachine guns, machine guns. fully automatic rifles, sawed-off shotguns, etc.) are all tightly controlled by the ATF, and you must have those weapons registered with them, and you must also have those weapons registered locally (sheriff, PD, etc.). The folks who own those not only pay the licensing fees, but the cost of those weapons is extremely high. The price of those guns starts at around $10K, and rises rapidly from there.

The only reported incident of which I'm aware, was a murder committed by a Dayton, OH, police officer who legally owned the weapon.
Just who is the authority who maintains the "... (show quote)


Texcaster wrote about the “tight controls” . You and he should be having this dialogue,

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 4 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
The Attic
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.