Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Check out Bridge Camera Show Case section of our forum.
Main Photography Discussion
Informal poll: What 61MP body do you use ?
Page <<first <prev 4 of 25 next> last>>
Dec 21, 2023 08:49:08   #
jbk224 Loc: Long Island, NY
 
IMO, the more MPs you have, the better!

See 1 MP (HorseJournals, 2/21/21, Melanie Huggett, Robin Duncan Photography)
See many MPs (same attribution)


(Download)



Reply
Dec 21, 2023 09:19:49   #
Longshadow Loc: Audubon, PA, United States
 
jbk224 wrote:
IMO, the more MPs you have, the better!

...

Obviously.
But not all are obsessed with it.

Reply
Dec 21, 2023 09:21:45   #
jbk224 Loc: Long Island, NY
 
Longshadow wrote:
Obviously.
But not all are obsessed with it.


I'm not talking about the MPs in our cameras--I could care less-more or so.

Reply
Check out Travel Photography - Tips and More section of our forum.
Dec 21, 2023 09:29:36   #
Longshadow Loc: Audubon, PA, United States
 
jbk224 wrote:
I'm not talking about the MPs in our cameras--I could care less-more or so.

Well, that seems to be the discussion subject.
What MPs are you referring to then?

Reply
Dec 21, 2023 09:32:24   #
burkphoto Loc: High Point, NC
 
User ID wrote:
Simple question.
Where will it lead ?


NONE.

I don't cover any subject matter where that many pixels would be a clear advantage. A camera like that would just bottleneck all the rest of my workflow with ridiculously large files.

As a former systems manager, I know that optimizing performance of any component of any system — beyond what the rest of the system can reasonably accommodate without bottlenecks — is fruitlessly wasteful.

Reply
Dec 21, 2023 09:36:19   #
JBRIII
 
While lenses don't have an mp rating, there is a theoretical limit for resolution based on diameter assuming a perfect surface. If interested, check ASTRO sites. Also depends on wavelength, reason radio telescopes are so huge.

Reply
Dec 21, 2023 09:36:45   #
imagextrordinair Loc: Halden, Norway
 
burkphoto wrote:
NONE.

I don't cover any subject matter where that many pixels would be a clear advantage. A camera like that would just bottleneck all the rest of my workflow with ridiculously large files.

As a former systems manager, I know that optimizing performance of any component of any system — beyond what the rest of the system can reasonably accommodate without bottlenecks — is fruitlessly wasteful.



Reply
Check out Street Photography section of our forum.
Dec 21, 2023 09:38:32   #
jbk224 Loc: Long Island, NY
 
Longshadow wrote:
Well, that seems to be the discussion subject.
What MPs are you referring to then?


My pictures are of 1 Mounted Policeman(see 'MP' on body) and many Mounted Policemen..
aka...MPs.

More of these MPs the better.

Reply
Dec 21, 2023 09:40:07   #
burkphoto Loc: High Point, NC
 
jbk224 wrote:
My pictures are of 1 Mounted Policeman(see 'MP' on body) and many Mounted Policemen..
aka...MPs.

More of these MPs the better.


{groan}

Reply
Dec 21, 2023 09:40:59   #
jbk224 Loc: Long Island, NY
 
burkphoto wrote:
{groan}


Exactly my opinion with this discussion.

Reply
Dec 21, 2023 09:43:43   #
jederick Loc: Northern Utah
 
jbk224 wrote:
My pictures are of 1 Mounted Policeman(see 'MP' on body) and many Mounted Policemen..
aka...MPs.

More of these MPs the better.



Reply
 
 
Dec 21, 2023 09:51:51   #
Longshadow Loc: Audubon, PA, United States
 
jbk224 wrote:
My pictures are of 1 Mounted Policeman(see 'MP' on body) and many Mounted Policemen..
aka...MPs.

More of these MPs the better.


Reply
Dec 21, 2023 09:54:45   #
W9OD Loc: Wisconsin
 
My body, it’s a 76! Next year I think I am getting a 77😊.

Reply
Dec 21, 2023 10:12:15   #
zarathu Loc: Bar Harbor, MDI, Maine
 
I take two kinds of photos: macro and hummingbirds and small animals. For both of these, my Canon R5 45mp works great since a I am always distance challenged in both directions. But it is the 13 x 19 print I worship, not the camera or lens. If it can produce a 300 dpi 13 x 19, its good enough for me(only requires about 10 mp).

More than 45 mp, I would need to trade my Macbook Pro M1 in for one with lots more memory than I currently have.

Reply
Dec 21, 2023 10:13:25   #
zarathu Loc: Bar Harbor, MDI, Maine
 
jbk224 wrote:
IMO, the more MPs you have, the better!

See 1 MP (HorseJournals, 2/21/21, Melanie Huggett, Robin Duncan Photography)
See many MPs (same attribution)


I didn’t know that members of parliament wore red suits and rode horses. You learn something new every day.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 4 of 25 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out Smartphone Photography section of our forum.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.