Good Thing I'm NOT MAGUllible! (Page 3): Biden will be paying more than his "fair share" of time for what he did. If he weren't the President's son, his plea bargain would now be a...

National Park

dennis2146 wrote:

That is only your opinion and not based upon any f... (show quote)

Biden will be paying more than his "fair share" of time for what he did. If he weren't the President's son, his plea bargain would now be a quiet part of history.

Hunter Biden said he would be happy to testify before the committee in public. Why does the committee want his testimony to be in private? So they can then leak portions of his testimony out of context, or outright lie about it?

Perhaps Hunter is following the precedent of others who have been subpoenaed to testify before congressional committees and failed to show up. You know, like extreme MAGA member Jim Jordan who was subpoenaed to testify before the 1/6 committee and never showed up. At some point criminal hypocrites on the right side of the aisle should practice what they preach.

Blurryeyed Loc: NC Mountains.

Texcaster wrote:

No one cares about Hunter Biden.

You wish.... What was he selling and why did China keep coming back for more....

Either you are being disingenuous or I have grossly over estimated your intelligence all these years.

Wyantry Loc: SW Colorado

Texcaster wrote:

Buy a sense of humor you MAGUllible MAGAdroog. If you're not laughing after Gnarly Taylor Greene's desperate parading of Hunter's dick pics in the House you'll never get it. Impeach him and be done with it. You know it makes sense.

Firstly, you might bother to look up the DEFINITION of impeachment prior to expressing your oral diarrhea.

”Through the impeachment process, Congress charges and then tries an official of the federal government for “Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.” The definition of “high Crimes and Misdemeanors” was not specified in the Constitution and has long been the subject of debate.”
SOURCE: https://www.senate.gov/about/powers-procedures/impeachment.htm#:

Secondly, since Hunter Biden is not an elected official, nor an official of the Federal Government,
HE CANNOT BE IMPEACHED!

DUH! Did someone take a Stupid-Pill or what?

Wyantry Loc: SW Colorado

National Park wrote:

I have no problem with having Hunter following the... (show quote)

The details of the indictment reveal Hunter Biden is in trouble for:
1). Possessing a weapon whilst being a [self]-confirmed drug addict, and:
2). That he LIED on a Federal Form requiring him to reveal said addiction and illegal drug use.

”Lying on the form (4473) is a felony punishable by up to 10 years in prison.
For being a user of unlawful drugs in possession of a firearm, the punishment is up to 5 years.

The odds of being charged for lying on the form are virtually nonexistent. In the 2019 fiscal year, when Hunter Biden purchased his gun, federal prosecutors received 478 referrals for lying on Form 4473 — and filed just 298 cases [62%]. The numbers were roughly similar for fiscal 2020.

At issue is when H. Biden answered “no” on the question that asks about unlawful drug use and addiction when purchasing a gun.

H. Biden had been discharged five years earlier from the Navy Reserve for drug use and based on his 2021 memoir, he was actively using crack cocaine in the year he bought the gun.

The data do not show how many people might have been prosecuted for falsely answering the question about active drug use. A 1990 Justice Department study noted how difficult it was to bring cases against people who falsely answer questions on the form, especially because there is no paper trail for drug abusers like there is for felons.”

SOURCE: https://www.ncja.org/crimeandjusticenews/few-prosecutions-for-lying-on-atf-gun-purchase-form

Texcaster Loc: Queensland

Blurryeyed wrote:

You wish.... What was he selling and why did China keep coming back for more....

Either you are being disingenuous or I have grossly over estimated your intelligence all these years.

You and Comer seem to have all the evidence linking criminality to Joe Biden. Will you and Comer please get on with presenting the fingerprints on the smoking gun, jailhouse time, evidence.

Republicans Demand Biden Tell Them Why They Are Impeaching Him
https://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-786265-1.html

Canisdirus

ArtzDarkroom wrote:

MAGA+Gullible=MAGUllible

It just seems to fit.

Coin a word or phrase or show one you've come across.

I never voted for Trump...nor am I a Republican.

But when I think of gullible and politics I think of the Democrat Party.

That entire party fell for the Russian Hoax...lock stock and barrel...completely fooled...and fooled hard.

I've never in my life seen so many people taken in...and the worst part is...lied to by your own party...your own people.

I don't listen much to Democrats today...I don't see any credibility.

Kraken Loc: Barry's Bay

Canisdirus wrote:

I never voted for Trump...nor am I a Republican.

But when I think of gullible and politics I think of the Democrat Party.

That entire party fell for the Russian Hoax...lock stock and barrel...completely fooled...and fooled hard.

I've never in my life seen so many people taken in...and the worst part is...lied to by your own party...your own people.

I don't listen much to Democrats today...I don't see any credibility.

Highly classified binder on 2016 Russian election interference went MISSING during Trump's last days in the White House: CIA still searching for file that vanished from a safe
A highly classified binder of documents related to 2016 Russian election interference disappeared during the final days of the Trump administration
While the documents were kept in a safe within a safe at CIA headquarters, they were moved to the White House for declassification in late December 2020
Cassidy Hutchinson wrote in her book that she saw former White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows take them home, which his lawyer denied

Overall, we rate Daily Mail Right Biased and Questionable due to numerous failed fact checks and poor information sourcing. (7/19/2016) Updated (M. Huitsing 11/20/2023)

Overall, we rate the New Republic Left biased based on story selection and editorial positions that frequently favor the left. We also rate them High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing of information and a clean fact check record. (D. Van Zandt 5/13/2016) Updated (12/09/2022)

Watash

Blurryeyed wrote:

Amazing that you actually think you are smart! Chief!

royden Loc: Decatur, GA

MAGA. My ass got arrested. 😎

royden Loc: Decatur, GA

MAGA. My ass got arrested. 😎

cwp3420

Kraken wrote:

Highly classified binder on 2016 Russian election ... (show quote)

Photo of Kraken the Karen revealing his true Karen self:

Wyantry Loc: SW Colorado

Kraken wrote:

Highly classified binder on 2016 Russian election ... (show quote)

Still neglecting to supply a SOURCE for the ratings, Eh?

David Van Zandt is founder of Media Bias Fact Check LLC. (MBFC) — an amateur-run, non-science-based subjective rating system that exhibits its own bias. (By choice of rating categories, reviewers biases, and inability to assess data based on verifiable scientific categorization).

What is so damn difficult that you cannot bring yourself to name the SOURCE of the ratings?
~~~~~~~~~~

”Writers at the Poynter Institute, which develops PolitiFact, have stated that "Media Bias/Fact Check is a widely cited source for news stories and even studies about misinformation, despite the fact that its method is in no way scientific."

“In 2018, a writer in the Columbia Journalism Review(1) described Media Bias/Fact Check as "an armchair media analysis" and characterized their assessments as "subjective assessments [that] leave room for human biases, or even simple inconsistencies, to creep in". (emphasis added)

SOURCE: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Media_Bias/Fact_Check

(1) ”Amateur attempts at such tools [bias analysis] already exist, and have found plenty of fans. Google “media bias,” and you’ll find Media Bias/Fact Check, run by armchair media analyst Dave Van Zandt.
The site’s methodology is simple: Van Zandt and his team rate each outlet from 0 to 10 on the categories of biased wording and headlines, factuality and sourcing, story choices (“does the source report news from both sides”), and political affiliation.

“A similar effort is “The Media Bias Chart,” or simply, “The Chart.” Created by Colorado patent attorney Vanessa Otero, the chart has gone through several methodological iterations, but currently is based on her evaluation of outlets’ stories on dimensions of veracity, fairness, and expression.

”Both efforts suffer from the very problem they’re trying to address: Their subjective assessments leave room for human biases, or even simple inconsistencies, to creep in.” (emphasis added)

SOURCE: https://www.cjr.org/innovations/measure-media-bias-partisan.php

Shutterbug1697 Loc: Northeast

wilpharm wrote:

Bribem

That would be what trump is doing to his alleged supporters.

A recent survey taken in Iowa is showing that alleged trump supporters are too scared of what their neighbors, friends, or families will do to them if they publicly came out and admitted that they will not support trump for his 2024 candidacy.

It'll be hard to hide in the caucuses, but easy to hide who they voted for in a primary or general election.

As the caucuses and primaries get closer, notice that there might be fewer trump lawn signs displayed for 2024 than in past election cycles on former trump supporter lawns. The same should hold for bumper stickers.

Shutterbug1697 Loc: Northeast

[quote=dennis2146]You forget, but it does go along with the Left blaming Conservatives, I haven't heard of any conservatives wanting to impeach Hunter Biden. Simply making him follow the law as the rest of us are required to do is appropriate for us.

Dennis[/quote
Does that include all of those GOPers who've illegally ignored subpoenas to testify?

Shutterbug1697 Loc: Northeast

Texcaster wrote:

Buy a sense of humor you MAGUllible MAGAdroog. If you're not laughing after Gnarly Taylor Greene's desperate parading of Hunter's dick pics in the House you'll never get it. Impeach him and be done with it. You know it makes sense.

I'm surprised that MTG wasn't brought up on charges of distributing sexual content in a public forum!