Check out Wedding Photography section of our forum.
No words, another
Dec 10, 2023 08:30:43 #
dpullum wrote:
The world has a breast fixation, sorry world, I was a formula-in-a-bottle baby. When I learned about man's duty to pleasure women, then my fixation was elsewhere... the labia come in many shapes and forms. paulrnzpn bravo for being brave and posting. In Texas, you would be arrested and executed.
Downloading and doing the + the shape, texture and multi-color become visible.
Downloading and doing the + the shape, texture and multi-color become visible.
LOL David... in Texas they would look too but just wouldn't comment on it. In fact they may look two or three times for good measure. Remember the Alamo! :)
Dec 10, 2023 08:55:34 #
ImageCreator wrote:
Where do we draw the line between porno and art? I’m just suggesting a little less. Many UHH image’s have been removed for offering more. I’m not offended by the photo. I believe we should strive for a higher standard. There are plenty of sites to get the raw look. We just don’t have to be one of them. We will let the moderators decide
Agreed. I'm no prude but this one is a little much for UHH.
Dec 10, 2023 09:22:45 #
What jfdnp said, and I did see your other shot. It was excellent; this one, not so much. The first borders on classic, this one is raunchy.
Check out The Pampered Pets Corner section of our forum.
Dec 10, 2023 09:30:41 #
paulrnzpn wrote:
He is another, this time outdoors and far more explicit. (A different lady too.)
I don't know, do you prefer explicit images like this one or do you prefer something more like my last nude post that leaves more to the imagination? Or do you like both?
I don't know, do you prefer explicit images like this one or do you prefer something more like my last nude post that leaves more to the imagination? Or do you like both?
I am not against this!!
However the only way I would really like this display is on a bed in real life without a camera in my hand!!
Dec 10, 2023 09:32:02 #
dpullum wrote:
The world has a breast fixation, sorry world, I was a formula-in-a-bottle baby. When I learned about man's duty to pleasure women, then my fixation was elsewhere... the labia come in many shapes and forms. paulrnzpn bravo for being brave and posting. In Texas, you would be arrested and executed.
Downloading and doing the + the shape, texture and multi-color become visible.
Downloading and doing the + the shape, texture and multi-color become visible.
I live in Texas and this is a very stupid comment to make about my state. But thinking back on other comments you have made, well, you are an idiot in some ways.
bruce.
Dec 10, 2023 10:45:33 #
paulrnzpn wrote:
He is another, this time outdoors and far more explicit. (A different lady too.)
I don't know, do you prefer explicit images like this one or do you prefer something more like my last nude post that leaves more to the imagination? Or do you like both?
I don't know, do you prefer explicit images like this one or do you prefer something more like my last nude post that leaves more to the imagination? Or do you like both?
It's not porn, no insertion or deliberate spreading, nor is it very artful. It is simply a strait-up honest picture of a smooth shaved lovely lady displayed just like she actually is. Adults will know this, prudes will gasp and clutch their pearls and those of us who appreciate art nude photography will murmur "OK...Nice" and then quickly continue our quest. BUT actually for me, I would much prefer a snap like this than one of a mostly covered model leaning against a tree or in a barn or a beach or some such supposed artful stratagem.....
Dec 10, 2023 10:50:01 #
Check out Video for DSLR and Point and Shoot Cameras section of our forum.
Dec 10, 2023 10:53:32 #
nikonwaddy wrote:
It's not porn, no insertion or deliberate spreadin... (show quote)
I agree, now, what would a prude be doing in this topic ? Maybe a closet perv huh ?
bruce
Dec 10, 2023 12:17:07 #
Call me the “prude” if you like, but I am far from a prude. But this is a “photography” forum, and I guess I look for “good photography.” This image is not, in my view, good photography. The pose screams “look at this” and little more. I can’t admire any other aspects of the model because of the obvious center of focus. And there is little else to comment on as a photo.
So my thinking is that these sorts of images are better posted elsewhere where the reason for looking is NOT photography.
So my thinking is that these sorts of images are better posted elsewhere where the reason for looking is NOT photography.
Dec 10, 2023 12:48:10 #
paulrnzpn wrote:
He is another, this time outdoors and far more explicit. (A different lady too.)
I don't know, do you prefer explicit images like this one or do you prefer something more like my last nude post that leaves more to the imagination? Or do you like both?
I don't know, do you prefer explicit images like this one or do you prefer something more like my last nude post that leaves more to the imagination? Or do you like both?
I have no problem with any part of the human body and a vulva is not something to get all up in arms about.
bwa
Dec 10, 2023 12:54:29 #
bwana wrote:
I have no problem with any part of the human body and a vulva is not something to get all up in arms about.
bwa
bwa
Hell yea this is a nude topic section, so a member posts an image, so what, if anyone doesn't like it they can just move on.
b
Check out Infrared Photography section of our forum.
Dec 10, 2023 13:07:44 #
Dec 10, 2023 13:53:07 #
Both…but this one strays prettty close to the porn boundary. Nothing wrong with porn of course, but artsy is better I think. That doesn’t preclude genitalia but tasteful genitalia is better.
Dec 10, 2023 14:14:46 #
Dec 10, 2023 14:44:44 #
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out Smartphone Photography section of our forum.