jerryc41 wrote:
I sent an email to a friend, and I made a typo. I typed "your" instead of "you." He pointed that out, so I replied.
"I put two typos into emails I send to my smart friends. I'm glad you found the easy one."
Jerry, that is your best post of the month! I love it.
therwol wrote:
Every time I see a typo, I loose my mind.
I caught that. I'm assuming it was intentional of course. Or is that of coarse?
jerryc41 wrote:
I sent an email to a friend, and I made a typo. I typed "your" instead of "you." He pointed that out, so I replied.
"I put two typos into emails I send to my smart friends. I'm glad you found the easy one."
Do you mind if I engage in a little plagiarism? I may have use for it.
niteman3d wrote:
How loose is it?
My mind has escaped. It may be over their in the loost and found.
raymondh wrote:
Touche!
Whatever happened to that young Cuban chappee?
Manglesphoto wrote:
Typos are mistakes your fingers make
Poor grammar is another can of worms, like, are for or, loose for lose , through for threw it goes on and on like a nightmare.
Right! Tape my fingers together so I can't type. If I were to get started on that, I'd most likely get banned from here.
At leased two-day, wee can blame the spilling connection aps!
terryMc wrote:
Some people say "Why should I study trigonometry and calculus, I'll never use that."
Well, I'm wondering now why I bothered to study English grammar and usage, since no one uses it anymore.
ur so rite. sinin of forenow
Horseart wrote:
Right! Tape my fingers together so I can't type. If I were to get started on that, I'd most likely get banned from here.
I'm not sure if I'm guilty of using poor grammar or modified grammar. At one time I was a stickler for the use of precise grammar and punctuation. The first indication that I was in decline was my tendency to end sentences with prepositions and not caring that I did so. Now I've developed the habit of writing in incomplete sentences. One I used today was, "And children." I could have written, "this also includes children," but tell me, don't both carry the same meaning? Which is more succinct, to the point, and although grammatically incorrect, is, nevertheless more pleasing to the senses? I'll stick with my occasional non-sentence. If you care to redline me when you see it, feel free. I, however, have cast off the strictures of structured prose and let my writing reflect more closely my thought.
Manglesphoto wrote:
Typos are mistakes your fingers make
Poor grammar is another can of worms, like, are for or, loose for lose , through for threw it goes on and on like a nightmare.
Several times I've skimmed through something I've typed, and I've not noticed the mistakes. I knew what I had intended to type, so that's what I saw.
Before you louse things up, thimk!
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.