Is This Any Surprise? (Page 11): But she stopped any actions as soon as electors were certified right . Trump has never stopped ! The difference is Clinton’s was only opinion where...

DennyT Loc: Central Missouri woods

Racmanaz wrote:

Hilary Clinton has also been denying the legitimacy of the 2016 election and she claims she should have been in office because she really won.

"You can run the best campaign, you can even become the nominee, and you can have the election stolen from you,”- Hillary Clinton

"He knows he's an illegitimate president"- Hillary Clinton

But she stopped any actions as soon as electors were certified right .
Trump has never stopped !

The difference is Clinton’s was only opinion where trump is accused of taking illegal actions

dennis2146 Loc: Eastern Idaho

Frank T wrote:

Buckwheat? So now you've resorted to ethnic slurs.
You are such a sad case.

Buckwheat was a character in the Our Gang series. Surely you are aware of that fact. I also call people Spanky, ALSO a character in the same series as was Darla, Alfalfa and others. I have absolutely no idea what color you are so what possible difference at this point does it make. I am calling you the name of a comical character which fits you perfectly. The RACISM is all on your Spanky. Now put your Racism in Uranus.

Dennis

dennis2146 Loc: Eastern Idaho

BooIsMyCat wrote:

You are so petty in your whining. br br br In th... (show quote)

What the hell does your comment have to do with anything else that has gone on in the history of the world? Does anybody really care what you are talking about as in EVER? I DON'T!!!!! Did anyone bring up the Secret Service?

Dennis

mwalsh Loc: Houston

DennyT wrote:

But she stopped any actions as soon as electors were certified right .
Trump has never stopped !

She also publicly conceded the election...trump never has.

Triple G

FrumCA wrote:

Boo and her leftist pals always default to Trump when they are losing or have lost the argument and they have nothing else to add to the topic under discussion. You'll never hear her voluntarily mention or admit to the probable criminal activity undertaken by Biden and possibly those democrat presidents who preceeded him in office to enrich themselves. Just an observation.

It's better to talk about actual charged crimes rather than alleged or even perceived or imagined crimes. Hang on and have patience. You may yet get to see another former president indicted, but it's not happened yet.

Racmanaz Loc: Sunny Tucson!

DennyT wrote:

But she stopped any actions as soon as electors were certified right .
Trump has never stopped !

The difference is one was Clinton’s was only opinion where trump is accused of taking illega11

That's a lie, Trump did stop taking action, he just denies the results as Clinton does to this day.

BooIsMyCat Loc: Somewhere

dennis2146 wrote:

What the hell does your comment have to do with anything else that has gone on in the history of the world? Does anybody really care what you are talking about as in EVER? I DON'T!!!!! Did anyone bring up the Secret Service?

Dennis

DUH!!!!

[quote=dennis2146] @ Sep 4, 2023 11:58:18

As far as I know the Secret Service has ALWAYS paid for their lodging and meals or at least taxpayers have paid for lodging as we are not at the cost of $16,000 per month to house SS personnel for protecting Hunter Biden. I didn't see you mention that little tidbit of information. Why not? You bring up nothing but crap and expect us to believe it. Not going to happen from my part.

Just in case you don't know the answer to your own question..... YOU DID!

And wasn't it YOU that was trying to give grammar and punctuation lessons to others here in the Attic recently?

That sentence I have bolded in red here sort of makes you look like the petty, snot-nosed, whiny, man-child you really are.

The six months of extra Secret Service protection approved by outgoing President Donald Chump for his four adult children and other staffers before leaving office cost taxpayers $1.7 million, according to spending documents analyzed by The Washington Post.

PEOPLE confirmed in January that Chump had extended the protection for his kids for six months when he left Washington, D.C., with a Secret Service source saying that the former president, 74, issued the last-minute extension as a "transition period" for Donald Chump Jr., Ivanka Chump (and her husband, Jared Kushner), Eric Chump (and his wife Lara Chump) and Tiffany Chump.

Racmanaz Loc: Sunny Tucson!

Triple G wrote:

It's better to talk about actual charged crimes rather than alleged or even perceived or imagined crimes. Hang on and have patience. You may yet get to see another former president indicted, but it's not happened yet.

Indictments and charges are pretty much the same, they are allegations except the latter has some evidence. But you seem to forget that these are the same allegations levied on Trump from you Lefties years before these indictments. In simpler terms, you Lefties were accusing "allegation" Trump of criminal actions for years, why aren't you using this same rule on allegations against Biden? So why the change now when it comes to Biden and after Trumps indictments?

Triple G

Racmanaz wrote:

Indictments and charges are pretty much the same, they are allegations except the latter has some evidence. But you seem to forget that these are the same allegations levied on Trump from you Lefties years before these indictments. In simpler terms, you Lefties were accusing "allegation" Trump of criminal actions for years, why aren't you using this same rule on allegations against Biden? So why the change now when it comes to Biden and after Trumps indictments?

Too much real trump stuff swirling around to spend time on anything else.

Frank T Loc: New York, NY

Racmanaz wrote:

Indictments and charges are pretty much the same, they are allegations except the latter has some evidence. But you seem to forget that these are the same allegations levied on Trump from you Lefties years before these indictments. In simpler terms, you Lefties were accusing "allegation" Trump of criminal actions for years, why aren't you using this same rule on allegations against Biden? So why the change now when it comes to Biden and after Trumps indictments?

Richard,
Now listen carefully, and have your nurse explain it to you if needed.
Trump has been indicted for his alleged crimes. That means that a grand jury, of his peers believes there is enough evidence to convict him, although he is not convicted yet.
Biden, on the other hand, has not been indicted, because there is no proof of wrongdoing, only allegations.
So here we are and the score is: Trump indicted on 91 felonies in four jurisdictions vs. Biden indicted on 0 felonies or any other crimes, anywhere. I truly hope that was helpful. I know how Alzheimers can play with your brain and confuse you, but know that science is working on cure and hopefully will find one before it's too late for you.
Be well.

Racmanaz Loc: Sunny Tucson!

Triple G wrote:

Too much real trump stuff swirling around to spend time on anything else.

So you can't answer the question, not surprising coming from the Spin Queen (You).

Racmanaz Loc: Sunny Tucson!

Frank T wrote:

Richard, br Now listen carefully, and have your n... (show quote)

Well that's odd, it appears that it is YOU that is in need of literacy help since you are illiterate. Read what I said again..

Racmanaz wrote:
Indictments and charges are pretty much the same, they are allegations except the latter has some evidence. But you seem to forget that these are the same allegations levied on Trump from you Lefties years before these indictments. In simpler terms, you Lefties were accusing "allegation" Trump of criminal actions for years, why aren't you using this same rule on allegations against Biden? So why the change now when it comes to Biden and after Trumps indictments?

Racmanaz Loc: Sunny Tucson!

Frank T wrote:

Richard, br Now listen carefully, and have your n... (show quote)

Stupidity is your close companion, a sitting President can NOT be indicted therefore can not be charged with a crime as a sitting President.

Racmanaz Loc: Sunny Tucson!

Frank T wrote:

Richard, br Now listen carefully, and have your n... (show quote)

Seriously, why do you have such hatred for senior citizens, overweight people and women? Dude, you have serious issues not to mention your racism.

dennis2146 Loc: Eastern Idaho

[quote=BooIsMyCat]DUH!!!!

dennis2146 wrote:

@ Sep 4, 2023 11:58:18 br br color=red b As f... (show quote)

DUH, my ass.

Is it against the law for Trump to extend the SS protection for his family? If so not Democrat has ever brought it up to my knowledge. Yet here you are whining and crying about it. Why?

That was my reason for saying nobody had brought up the Secret Service. Of course it has been brought up before and the time you mentioned was by me. I brought up the Secret Service for one aspect, the taxpayers are paying for the SS lodging while they look after protecting Hunter Biden. But you went overboard as if my one comment on that factor alone included ALL SS duties.

What next, you will chastise me for every SS action including the failure of the one SS agent to protect Lincoln at Ford's Theater. History has long proven that SS agent was a known Democratic Southern sympathizer and collaborator.

No, not really but for a second or two it sure had little cat piss going.

Dennis