People think the Biden Crime family is a crime family because: (Page 3): You think what people or newspapers say is Evidence, but it is NOT: These things you used as evidence are just...

travelwp Loc: New Jersey

Shutterbug1697 wrote:

https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2022/05/jared-kushner-affinity-partners-saudi-arabia

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/massive-saudi-investment-raises-questions-about-jared-kushners-business-dealings

https://www.businessinsider.com/kushners-2-billion-investment-saudi-backed-fund-concealed-sec-rules-2023-2

https://www.newsweek.com/jared-kushners-ties-saudi-arabia-need-doj-scrutiny-ex-trump-lawyer-1805742

You think what people or newspapers say is Evidence, but it is NOT:
These things you used as evidence are just comments:
"investment raised questions"
"a lawyer reported"
"NYT reported"
"Wash Post reported"

skylane5sp Loc: Puyallup, WA

travelwp wrote:

You think what people or newspapers say is Evidence, but it is NOT:
These things you used as evidence are just comments:
"investment raised questions"
"a lawyer reported"
"NYT reported"
"Wash Post reported"

Isn’t that just like Schiff’s ‘evidence’?

travelwp Loc: New Jersey

skylane5sp wrote:

Isn’t that just like Schiff’s ‘evidence’?

What does it mean to censure Schiff?

The measure censures Schiff “for misleading the American public and for conduct unbecoming of an elected Member of the House of Representatives” and directs the Ethics Committee to conduct an investigation into the congressman's “falsehoods, misrepresentations, and abuses of sensitive information.”

Shutterbug1697 Loc: Northeast

travelwp wrote:

What does it mean to censure Schiff?

The measure censures Schiff “for misleading the American public and for conduct unbecoming of an elected Member of the House of Representatives” and directs the Ethics Committee to conduct an investigation into the congressman's “falsehoods, misrepresentations, and abuses of sensitive information.”

Are they going to investigate every GOP member of the house who've mislead the American public?

Starting with

MTG
Lauren Boebert
Jim Jordan
Matt Gaetz
Jim Coemer

gorgehiker Loc: Lexington, Ky

Devon Archer's testimony before the house committee was just another embarrassment for the GOP. What crime did Joe commit? Are they going to charge him with calling his son and discussing the weather?

mwalsh Loc: Houston

gorgehiker wrote:

Devon Archer's testimony before the house committee was just another embarrassment for the GOP. What crime did Joe commit? Are they going to charge him with calling his son and discussing the weather?

That is a pretty naive observation of what Archer related.

Joe has to quit lying regarding never being involved with Hunter's business relationships...

Joe just talked weather at least 20 times..."c'mon man"...to quote Joe.

Triple G

mwalsh wrote:

That is a pretty naive observation of what Archer related.

Joe has to quit lying regarding never being involved with Hunter's business relationships...

Joe just talked weather at least 20 times..."c'mon man"...to quote Joe.

According to you and others(Durham), there wasn't enough substantive evidence (steele dossier) to justify a full blown FBI investigation into trump. What substantive evidence (Archer saying it was sift peddling of influence?) has been revealed to warrant one on Biden? Apparently, the new practices implemented on Wray's and Durham's recommendations indicate more caution from the FBI? I'm looking forward to Weiss testimony.

mwalsh Loc: Houston

Triple G wrote:

According to you and others(Durham), there wasn't enough substantive evidence (steele dossier) to justify a full blown FBI investigation into trump. What substantive evidence (Archer saying it was sift peddling of influence?) has been revealed to warrant one on Biden? Apparently, the new practices implemented on Wray's and Durham's recommendations indicate more caution from the FBI? I'm looking forward to Weiss testimony.

You infer entirely too much. Don't put words in my mouth and then criticize your fabrication of words you claim I said.

Go troll someone else.

You are dismissed.

Triple G

mwalsh wrote:

You infer entirely too much. Don't put words in my mouth and then criticize your fabrication of words you claim I said.

Go troll someone else.

You are dismissed.

You're so cute when you get huffy and can't answer a simple question. Whatcha got?

wilpharm Loc: Oklahoma

Kraken wrote:

It's worn out HERE on UHH.

NO its not...KKKRAKEN you do not get to make those decisions

Kraken Loc: Barry's Bay

wilpharm wrote:

NO its not...KKKRAKEN you do not get to make those decisions

Well, then I would like to talk to the person that does.

travelwp Loc: New Jersey

SteveS wrote:

So you believe allegations against the Biden's doesn't have substance unless allegations against Trump and Kushner are brought forth.

How does that even make sense?

It doesn't make sense, it's a mental illness the left has.

mwalsh Loc: Houston

Triple G wrote:

You're so cute when you get huffy and can't answer a simple question. Whatcha got?

Why would I answer anything you ask when you lie about what I have said.

You have made yourself irrelevant.

Congrats!

Triple G

mwalsh wrote:

Why would I answer anything you ask when you lie about what I have said.

You have made yourself irrelevant.

Congrats!

You can't show where I attributed anything to you incorrectly...unless you never said the Steele dossier was not enough to begin an investigation. Did you?

You are just someone who piles on even after the skirmish is over. You're the one who is "too full of yourself" if you think you have any power to "dismiss" or determine relevance. Noted that you have nothing of substance to add to the discussion. You don't have to respond to me (which would suit me just fine), but you could answer many of the others who have asked the same question. Whatcha got as substantive evidence to open an FBI investigation into President Biden?

Kraken Loc: Barry's Bay

travelwp wrote:

It doesn't make sense, it's a mental illness the left has.

And YOU have the audacity to point fingers.