Supreme Court Errors Aren't Hard To Find: For those of you like Little Denise who think the Supreme Court is always right, take a few minutes to read this article. Then after you wipe...

Frank T Loc: New York, NY

For those of you like Little Denise who think the Supreme Court is always right, take a few minutes to read this article.
Then after you wipe the tears from your eyes, maybe Denise can respond like a normal person instead of a right-wing troll.
Thank you for your time.

https://www.propublica.org/article/supreme-court-errors-are-not-hard-to-find

Triple G

Frank T wrote:

For those of you like Little Denise who think the Supreme Court is always right, take a few minutes to read this article.
Then after you wipe the tears from your eyes, maybe Denise can respond like a normal person instead of a right-wing troll.
Thank you for your time.

https://www.propublica.org/article/supreme-court-errors-are-not-hard-to-find

I'm just wondering how many other "hypothetical" issues will get access to SCOTUS?

pendennis

I wonder why they didn't cite Brown v. Board of Education, when faulty psychological science was used to buttress arguments for the plaintiffs? Or just how is separate, but equal, inherently unequal?

Court cases at all levels are decided on faulty arguments. In U.S. v. Miller, one of the justices decided that the shotgun in question wasn't used by "militia", ergo was not covered by the 2nd Amendment.

GeneB Loc: Chattanooga Tennessee

why should they always get it right, no one else does,

dennis2146 Loc: Eastern Idaho

Frank T wrote:

For those of you like Little Denise who think the Supreme Court is always right, take a few minutes to read this article.
Then after you wipe the tears from your eyes, maybe Denise can respond like a normal person instead of a right-wing troll.
Thank you for your time.

https://www.propublica.org/article/supreme-court-errors-are-not-hard-to-find

Thank you francine for bringing up my name in your idiotic post. I appreciate you using me to once AGAIN show others in The Attic not only what a liar you are but also how you have no ethics or common sense.

You post, "For those of you like Little Denise who think the Supreme Court is always right,..." Show us little francine where I have EVER said, the Supreme Court is always right? Yes, take that as an open challenge to the mindless BS you post here often. I have NEVER said anything like that in my life nor have I ever felt the Supreme Court was always right. The court is made up of human beings and is capable of making mistakes. Roe Vs Wade is one example. The Dred Scott decision is another. Others here have/will bring up even more. But the court is generally able to correct those mistakes.

You want me to respond like a normal person, you tell us. You mean like your form of normality which is not normal at all across America. You lie in your posts, you generally have no facts to bring up and you insult just to be insulting.

Dennis

LDB415 Loc: Houston south suburb

When they don't side with the left it's an error?

wilpharm Loc: Oklahoma

dennis2146 wrote:

Thank you francine for bringing up my name in your... (show quote)

dennis2146 Loc: Eastern Idaho

Frank T wrote:

Denise, Your next-door neighbor is a potato. I don't think you're qualified to define normal, as you have no experience with it.

Thank you little francine. Only YOU would give credence to anybody who might identify as a potato. That is why your brain appears to be a potato but in Mashed Potato form. As for potatoes I have a number of them growing in my backyard so I sure know what a potato looks like and it sure ain't like any human being I have ever seen.

You sure are a trip. Stay off the drugs little francine. They started affecting your brain some years ago. They turned you into a lying corrupt no brain Democrat. It shows LOSER.

Dennis

dennis2146 Loc: Eastern Idaho

wilpharm wrote:

Gracias Amigo.

little francine sure is having her problems this weekend. Must be the pains of knowing she lives in a, so far anyway, free America but through no contribution of her own. The upcoming 4th of July has her brain feeling fried.

Dennis

pendennis

dennis2146 wrote:

Thank you francine for bringing up my name in your... (show quote)

The problem herein, is that the Supreme Court usually decides cases on the narrowest interpretations possible. No Court, especially the more conservative versions, wants to wholesale upset our society with overly broad rulings or interpretations of cases or the Constitution. We've had enough of that BS with the Warren and Berger Courts. Everyone seems to forget the reactions to Brown v. Board..., and Federal court orders concerning busing, especially cross-district.

When Roe was decided, it was an opportunity for the vox populi to raise such a stink, that Congress would have been forced to take action to repeal, or at least limit via legislation so-called abortion rights. Had Roman Catholic priests, ministers, preachers, etc., all stood in the lectern or pulpit and kept things stirred up, there wouldn't have been necessary a SCOTUS ruling last year.

dennis2146 Loc: Eastern Idaho

pendennis wrote:

The problem herein, is that the Supreme Court usua... (show quote)

I like what you posted.

Dennis

Frank T Loc: New York, NY

Keep your eyes in the news.
There's some shocking info about ti be released about that website case.
The fun never stops.

Blurryeyed Loc: NC Mountains.

Frank T wrote:

For those of you like Little Denise who think the Supreme Court is always right, take a few minutes to read this article.
Then after you wipe the tears from your eyes, maybe Denise can respond like a normal person instead of a right-wing troll.
Thank you for your time.

https://www.propublica.org/article/supreme-court-errors-are-not-hard-to-find

Still crying Frank? Get used to it as I am pretty sure the conservative majority on the court will out live you.

Frank T Loc: New York, NY

Blurryeyed wrote:

Still crying Frank? Get used to it as I am pretty sure the conservative majority on the court will out live you.

Perhaps we'll start by impeaching Thomas. That would be a good move.
The man was corrupt from the get-go.

Blurryeyed Loc: NC Mountains.

Frank T wrote:

Perhaps we'll start by impeaching Thomas. That would be a good move.
The man was corrupt from the get-go.

In your dreams, there is a history of the leftwing justices engaging in similar behavior including RBG the saint of liberal justices. I don't think that I have to remind you that the impeachment process begins in the House so your current chances are slim to none.

Having said that I did skim through the ruling in the web-designer case and it did not go through the state court system but it did go through the federal circuit. I find it a bit baffling that there was no objection to the origin of the case until after the court ruled against the state.