gwilliams6 wrote:
On a a recent trip to the Caribbean Island of Sint Maarten/St. Martin I shot with my 50mp Sony A1, and 61mp Sony A7RIV alongside my stepson who was shooting with his iPhone 14. I had with my a few lenses which covered me from 17mm to 600mm. The iPhone 14 has lenses that cover 13mm, 24mm, 48mm, 77mm (some of that accomplished with a digital crop) .
The iPhone made some very nice photos, especially in low light, but a lot of that from that tiny Sony sensor and tiny Sony mirrorless camera inside the iPhone is accomplished with a lot of AI. Nothing wrong with that if you are happy with the results.
Once we blew up those heavily AI iPhone shots and compared them to my 50mp and 61mp images from my Sony cameras, it was obvious that the iPhone shots could not hold up in quality to the fullframe Sony shots, and started to break up and you could see the AI artifacts clearly.
If weight is the most important thing, then yes ditch your fullframe cameras and use only your smartphones and be happy with the results. But if you are on a bucket-list trip you might want to think twice about accepting less than the best image quality you have available to you.
Your choice, your decision on what matters most in your photography. Yes as most people do, I do carry a smartphone with me, but mainly for use as a phone and online tool. Only use it as a camera in a pinch.
Here is one iphone 14 shot by my stepson Alex from that trip. It is very good, but does start to break up if you blow it up. And I took this iPhone image and did my best to clean up much of the noise and those AI artifacts in Lightroom, but much of that is still there.
Cheers and best to you all. .
On a a recent trip to the Caribbean Island of Sint... (
show quote)