Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Check out Smartphone Photography section of our forum.
The Attic
Attractive Women more likely to be “right-wing” conservatives
Page 1 of 4 next> last>>
Jun 23, 2023 12:10:09   #
bobbyjohn Loc: Dallas, TX
 
According to a new study published by Scientific Reports, attractive women were more likely to be “right-wing,” while women whose faces displayed contempt were more likely to be “left-wing.”

The study found that masculinity and attractiveness weren’t linked to ideology in men, but happy faces (both men and women) were likely to be representatives of right-wing parties. Meanwhile, politicians who had a neutral expression or showed contempt were more likely to represent left-wing ideologies.

These findings were backed by more recent data that showed that liberal women are statistically the unhappiest and most mentally ill demographic in America.

For all the details see:

https://magaconservatives.com/new-study-shows-that-conservative-women-are-more-attractive-than-left-wing-women/?fbclid=IwAR2XBqewJLLwmLd830SpgRMJRpJazexvEAIDiOeQnF8DZ5fIU6pZBekexKc


(Download)

Reply
Jun 23, 2023 12:35:38   #
Tex-s
 
I don’t have time to scour the story, but anecdotally, the more traditional (conservative style, not necessarily overly modest) a woman dresses in virtually every geographic region in the US, the more the average man will deem them attractive. A purple buzz cut, nose piercings and neck tattoos are almost exclusive to the left and almost a guarantee to score low on an ‘attractive’ poll. Therefore, analyzing a couple of peripheral influences, I’d agree with the premise.

Reply
Jun 23, 2023 13:24:40   #
Frank T Loc: New York, NY
 
I don't know. The conservative women I see on TV are usually overweight, missing teeth and wearing t-shirts with guns, flags and hate sayings.
But if that's what you like, go for it.

Reply
Check out Close Up Photography section of our forum.
Jun 23, 2023 14:33:53   #
mwalsh Loc: Houston
 
bobbyjohn wrote:
According to a new study published by Scientific Reports, attractive women were more likely to be “right-wing,” while women whose faces displayed contempt were more likely to be “left-wing.”

The study found that masculinity and attractiveness weren’t linked to ideology in men, but happy faces (both men and women) were likely to be representatives of right-wing parties. Meanwhile, politicians who had a neutral expression or showed contempt were more likely to represent left-wing ideologies.

These findings were backed by more recent data that showed that liberal women are statistically the unhappiest and most mentally ill demographic in America.

For all the details see:

https://magaconservatives.com/new-study-shows-that-conservative-women-are-more-attractive-than-left-wing-women/?fbclid=IwAR2XBqewJLLwmLd830SpgRMJRpJazexvEAIDiOeQnF8DZ5fIU6pZBekexKc
According to a new study published by Scientific R... (show quote)


Yep, ruddy-faced gnarly MTG is a real hottie!

LoL

Reply
Jun 23, 2023 18:10:54   #
DaveO Loc: Northeast CT
 
Country bred, corn fed and got most all of her teeth!

Reply
Jun 23, 2023 20:27:59   #
Racmanaz Loc: Sunny Tucson!
 
mwalsh wrote:
Yep, ruddy-faced gnarly MTG is a real hottie!

LoL


Or Debbie Wasserman Schultz ha ha, what a lefty beauty



Reply
Jun 24, 2023 08:25:51   #
gorgehiker Loc: Lexington, Ky
 
If a woman is to be hired on Fox News, the most important qualification is that she must be beautiful. Beautiful woman are good for ratings. However, when you look at the women who attend Trump rallies, they are mostly fat, angry women.

Reply
Check out Panorama section of our forum.
Jun 24, 2023 08:28:37   #
anotherview Loc: California
 
Without first perusing the report, I note that the summary mentions subjective measures like appearance as data for determining outcomes. I see no mention of the scientific method as the approach to knowledge and understanding. Hence, the introduction fell short of my further interest.
bobbyjohn wrote:
According to a new study published by Scientific Reports, attractive women were more likely to be “right-wing,” while women whose faces displayed contempt were more likely to be “left-wing.”

The study found that masculinity and attractiveness weren’t linked to ideology in men, but happy faces (both men and women) were likely to be representatives of right-wing parties. Meanwhile, politicians who had a neutral expression or showed contempt were more likely to represent left-wing ideologies.

These findings were backed by more recent data that showed that liberal women are statistically the unhappiest and most mentally ill demographic in America.

For all the details see:

https://magaconservatives.com/new-study-shows-that-conservative-women-are-more-attractive-than-left-wing-women/?fbclid=IwAR2XBqewJLLwmLd830SpgRMJRpJazexvEAIDiOeQnF8DZ5fIU6pZBekexKc
According to a new study published by Scientific R... (show quote)

Reply
Jun 24, 2023 08:41:51   #
steve03 Loc: long Lsland
 
[quote=bobbyjohn]According to a new study published by Scientific Reports, attractive women were more likely to be “right-wing,” while women whose faces displayed contempt were more likely to be “left-wing.”

The study found that masculinity and attractiveness weren’t linked to ideology in men, but happy faces (both men and women) were likely to be representatives of right-wing parties. Meanwhile, politicians who had a neutral expression or showed contempt were more likely to represent left-wing ideologies.

These findings were backed by more recent data that showed that liberal women are statistically the unhappiest and most mentally ill demographic in America.

For all the details see:\

You have reaches a new low of stupid and meaningless

Reply
Jun 24, 2023 12:32:21   #
bobbyjohn Loc: Dallas, TX
 
Pretend, for a moment, that you do not recognize any of these women. They are from the world of politics and news. Just by the photograph of each, can you identify which of these women are Democrat and which are Republican?

Case made!


(Download)

Reply
Jun 24, 2023 12:33:34   #
Tex-s
 
[quote=steve03]
bobbyjohn wrote:
According to a new study published by Scientific Reports, attractive women were more likely to be “right-wing,” while women whose faces displayed contempt were more likely to be “left-wing.”

The study found that masculinity and attractiveness weren’t linked to ideology in men, but happy faces (both men and women) were likely to be representatives of right-wing parties. Meanwhile, politicians who had a neutral expression or showed contempt were more likely to represent left-wing ideologies.

These findings were backed by more recent data that showed that liberal women are statistically the unhappiest and most mentally ill demographic in America.

For all the details see:\

You have reaches a new low of stupid and meaningless
According to a new study published by Scientific R... (show quote)


You are quite likely correct that this study is ‘stupid’ in that there is very likely no one who will change their views, choices, or opinions because of the study. I’ll suggest, thought, that the study is not ‘meaningless’. If the results portray real opinions, and if no one will change based on the findings, there is a very real possibility that a substantial majority of the future population could end up being raised by these ‘prettier conservative’ ladies when the others either have fewer suitors in addition to their collective desire not to conform with ‘gender roles’ like having babies.

Reply
Check out Close Up Photography section of our forum.
Jun 24, 2023 12:37:49   #
Frank T Loc: New York, NY
 
Nice to know that these young women like men to control their vaginas.
Why any woman would be a Republican today is a mystery to me.

Reply
Jun 24, 2023 12:42:17   #
Racmanaz Loc: Sunny Tucson!
 
Frank T wrote:
Nice to know that these young women like men to control their vaginas.
Why any woman would be a Republican today is a mystery to me.


So you’re admitting that all women are born with vaginas? By the way liar, no Republicans are trying to control any woman’s vagina.

By the way, little Frankie poo, I know you don’t know this, but the unborn baby is located in the uterus not the vagina.

Reply
Jun 24, 2023 13:38:42   #
Alafoto Loc: Montgomery, AL
 
My daughter-in-law is an extremely attractive young woman. However, corrupted by college educations, she and our son both are left leaning, though not so far as to fall off the shelf. This seems to be counter to the post's postulation. Family gatherings are a no politics zone by mutual agreement. Sometime since I left college, university classrooms have become breeding grounds for Communist indoctrination.

Interestingly, the other two sons have remained unaffected by their exposure, but are both land surveyors and engineers, so maybe the emphasis on actual facts in their curriculum acted as an immunization to the BS. The two libs were both business majors, one with an MBA, as was I, many moons ago.

Reply
Jun 24, 2023 13:41:44   #
Alafoto Loc: Montgomery, AL
 
Tex-s wrote:
You are quite likely correct that this study is ‘stupid’ in that there is very likely no one who will change their views, choices, or opinions because of the study. I’ll suggest, thought, that the study is not ‘meaningless’. If the results portray real opinions, and if no one will change based on the findings, there is a very real possibility that a substantial majority of the future population could end up being raised by these ‘prettier conservative’ ladies when the others either have fewer suitors in addition to their collective desire not to conform with ‘gender roles’ like having babies.
You are quite likely correct that this study is ‘s... (show quote)


I think it would be a benefit to society if the ugly, bitter, strident women above did not submit to gender norms and procreate.

Reply
Page 1 of 4 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out Video for DSLR and Point and Shoot Cameras section of our forum.
The Attic
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.