btbg

I see that you refuse to answer the basic question of why anyone would hore Hunter
Unless that question can be answered then I am not wrong.

DennyT Loc: Central Missouri woods

Ask and answered

“””” No one has ever argued that point. You started this discussion with the claim that Biden went to Ukraine and pressure them to fire the the prosecutor to stop the investigation into Hunter.

You had the facts wrong . That was conclusively proven wrong now you pivot to something else entirely.
“”””

Move on

btbg

You haven't answered the question. Why would Burisma hire Hunter unless it was for access to Joe? You can't answer that question, because you know the answer is that this is corruption at the highest level. So, why are you supporting Joe?

DennyT Loc: Central Missouri woods

Of course they hired him fir that reason? What is corrupt about what they did ?

As I said once:

“No one has ever argued that point. You started this discussion with the claim that Biden went to Ukraine and pressure them to fire the the prosecutor to stop the investigation into Hunter.

You had the facts wrong . That was conclusively proven wrong now you pivot to something else entirely.”

BooIsMyCat Loc: Somewhere

NO!... you ARE wrong!

'The Biden name was gold to them': President's son Hunter admits he got a $50-000-a-month job on the board of Ukrainian gas company Burisma because of his family name...

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9439907/Hunter-Biden-admits-Burisma-hired-family-name.html

The "very same thing" happens all throughout the business world. It is referred to as "networking".

Stop listening to Chump world!

btbg

Of course people get hired in the business world because of their names. This is not the same thing. They hired him for access to the vice president. That means that they hired him for access to policy decision making from the U.S. Government. That is hardly the same thing as hiring someone in the business world because of who daddy is.

Are you seriously OK with families of politicians enriching themselves in exchange for access to the politicians? The Bidens have become multimillionaires because of Joe's political office. That is called influence peddling. The money trail that is in the bank records that the house committee has subpoenaed have already shown 10 million to nine different Biden family members, all passed through shell companies. And now they have a new batch of records that will show even more money. In case you don't know, that is money laundering.

The evidence is all there, and the circumstantial evidence regarding Joe's interactions in Ukraine seem to match exactly with the money laundering. Yet you continue to give the Biden crime family a pass. Are you blind?

DennyT Loc: Central Missouri woods

You ASSuming to much . There is not one shred of evidence
supporting any undo influence by vp
Show us all what you think is “ evidence”

foodie65

ALLEGEDLY

foodie65

Yes, and the evidence is in the same place with ALL the evidence of 2020 election fraud.

btbg

Nine Biden family members including two grandchildren receiving payments from overseas that went through shell changes should be plenty of proof. Using a shell company is money laundering.

None of them appear to have provided any services in exchange for the money. Thus the only logical reason they received payments had to be for access to Joe.

We know for sure that he lied about not knowing about his sons business deals as there are photos of him meeting with Hunters business associates. Do you honestly believe all of that is above board?

foodie65

And this was all found with Hilary’s email, right?

btbg

Maybe with the Clinton Foundation. Her email is much more like the Trump case.

BooIsMyCat Loc: Somewhere

When do you think an indictment will come down?

I'm all for "equal justice for all" so, I have no problems with Joe Biden and/or any of his family being indicted for crimes that they commit.... but, not far-right innuendos.


https://www.cnn.com/2023/06/20/politics/hunter-biden/index.html

btbg

Well, Hunter has already been indicted. Of course his indictment does not include the corruption. It only includes the false tax statements he made hiding the ill gotten gains from the corruption.

Joe won't be indicted until either he is impeached, which is unlikely that it will happen because they couldn't get enough votes in the senate to make it stick, or after he is out of office. They can't indict him while he is still president. But even the indictment of Hunter still reeks of wrongdoing from the DOJ. Five years to investigate including the illegal gun charge, which has already been proven years ago in court records. He could have been indicted for that a long time ago.

And, the indictment skips most of the corruption proven on his laptop. As to right wing innuendo, it isn't innuendo. It's right there in Hunter's emails and photos on his laptop. Multiple examples of setting money aside for "The Big Guy" which Devon Archer and others have already testified is Joe.

Nine family members getting money paid through shell corporations is proof of wrongdoing. No one uses a shell company for normal earnings. They are purely for money laundering. So, it's not innuendo. The proof is right in front of your eyes.

Also as to Hunter it appears that they have plea bargained to a pair of misdemeanors instead of the felonies that he actually committed. Once again the DOJ is not handling people equally.
https://outlook.live.com/mail/0/inbox/id/AQQkADAwATY3ZmYAZS05MzI5LTdmMGEtMDACLTAwCgAQAMEdX2v6YoFHhgrzDALgPf0%3D

BooIsMyCat Loc: Somewhere

That's the problem here. He can't!

He seems to be one of those who believe in GOP gossip.