Trump legally responsible for sexual assault (Page 2): Now that the libs here have pontificated about how utterly stupid and infinitely stupid they are here let's educate them a bit.

Architect1776 Loc: In my mind

gorgehiker wrote:

In the Access Hollywood video, Trump literally bra... (show quote)

Now that the libs here have pontificated about how utterly stupid and infinitely stupid they are here let's educate them a bit.
Trump never said anything about forcing women and against their will by forcefully grabbing their pussies.
He said "let" which means with utter, complete and willingness they let him do it.
No violation of anything and I bet you libs have likely all done the same thing, or you are a bunch of liars or freaks.
So now your stupidity is exposed on the subject just drop it before you look any more ignorant and stupid than you already are.

Shutterbug1697 Loc: Northeast

Architect1776 wrote:

Yeah right.
He did nothing, nothing was proven even close and the slut ...

Becareful, you could face a libel suit with your comment!

Do you have that kind of money to lose?

Architect1776 Loc: In my mind

Shutterbug1697 wrote:

Becareful, you could face a libel suit with your comment!

Do you have that kind of money to lose?

In other words I am right.
You cannot refute me that libs are so stupid to keep referring to the tape because it exonerates Trump.
So sue me all you want.

Shutterbug1697 Loc: Northeast

Architect1776 wrote:

In other words I am right.
You cannot refute me that libs are so stupid to keep referring to the tape because it exonerates Trump.
So sue me all you want.

It's not me you'd have to worry about suing you, it's Carroll who was just awarded $5,000,000 from trump, who could come after you for libel and a financial settlement.

But in your case it would actually be slander, not libel.

Architect1776 Loc: In my mind

Shutterbug1697 wrote:

It's not me you'd have to worry about suing you, it's Carroll who was just awarded $5,000,000 from trump, who could come after you for libel and a financial settlement.

But in your case it would actually be slander, not libel.

Bring it on.
You obviously cannot use the idiot claim that lib clowns keep regurgitating about letting grab.
All idiot libs should be worried about this case as it goes back decades.
She lied but found an anti Trump judge and jury who could care less that she was proven to be lying 100%.
If this is the new standard then you should worry.
And again sue me any time.

Frank T Loc: New York, NY

Architect1776 wrote:

Bring it on.
You obviously cannot use the idiot claim that lib clowns keep regurgitating about letting grab.
All idiot libs should be worried about this case as it goes back decades.
She lied but found an anti Trump judge and jury who could care less that she was proven to be lying 100%.
If this is the new standard then you should worry.
And again sue me any time.

A jury of nine citizens heard all the evidence and found it compelling.
Your allegation that she was lying appears to be a lie. What evidence do you have that she was lying?
Or, did you get your Trump panties in a bunch defending a miscreant like Trump, because you hate women?
You used to bother me with your incessant defense of Fat Donny, but now, you just amuse me.

BooIsMyCat Loc: Somewhere

Architect1776 wrote:

Bring it on.
You obviously cannot use the idiot claim that lib clowns keep regurgitating about letting grab.
All idiot libs should be worried about this case as it goes back decades.
She lied but found an anti Trump judge and jury who could care less that she was proven to be lying 100%.
If this is the new standard then you should worry.
And again sue me any time.

Chump says she lied so, Archi1776 says she lied.

Been drinking KOOK AID much?

Caribou Loc: St. Louis, MO

mikee wrote:

Trump was found, by a jury, to have sexually assaulted a woman in a Manhattan store. Am I surprised? Nope, not one bit.

Unfortunately, the trial of Carrol vs. Trump was civil, otherwise he'd be in jail and on the sex offender list where he belongs. But, the orange cult will look away and still follow him, the sexual predator. Will I be surprised? Nope, not one bit.

As has been cited often:

"I could stand in the middle of Fifth Avenue and shoot somebody, and I wouldn't lose any voters, OK?" Trump remarked at a campaign stop at Dordt College in Sioux Center, Iowa. "It's, like, incredible." January, 2016

And, his worshipers, who already equate him with Jesus, will see this as just another example of his martyrdom. He will become even more appealing to them.

Bazbo Loc: Lisboa, Portugal

Architect1776 wrote:

Now that the libs here have pontificated about how... (show quote)

You seem to know a lot about this Arch. Please expound on the butter.

BTW, what you think of the trial and the verdict means nothing at all. I am sure you are getting your checkbook ready for the fund-raising pitch.

gorgehiker Loc: Lexington, Ky

Architect1776 wrote:

Now that the libs here have pontificated about how... (show quote)

Arch, stop twisting yourself into a pretzel to defend the pu..y grabber. Here is exactly what Trump said on the Access Hollywood tape:

"I better use some Tic Tacs just in case I start kissing her. You know I'm automatically attracted to beautiful—I just start kissing them. It's like a magnet. Just kiss. I don't even wait. And when you're a star, they let you do it. You can do anything. Grab 'em by the pussy. You can do anything."

Texcaster Loc: Queensland

BooIsMyCat wrote:

img src="https://static.uglyhedgehog.com/images/s... (show quote)

lol! I always use 'patriot' with a kilo of salt when referencing the 'lolos' in the *party of of Trump & Santos & Jesus.

*Traitorous Chump Monkeys? Let me count the ways.

BooIsMyCat Loc: Somewhere

Texcaster wrote:

lol! I always use 'patriot' with a kilo of salt when referencing the 'lolos' in the *party of of Trump & Santos & Jesus.

*Traitorous Chump Monkeys? Let me count the ways.

BooIsMyCat Loc: Somewhere

Architect1776 wrote:

Bring it on.
You obviously cannot use the idiot claim that lib clowns keep regurgitating about letting grab.
All idiot libs should be worried about this case as it goes back decades.
She lied but found an anti Trump judge and jury who could care less that she was proven to be lying 100%.
If this is the new standard then you should worry.
And again sue me any time.

You obviously, know very little about the law.

Grabbing someone by the pu$$y is "assault".

The definition of assault is: "an intentional act that puts another person in reasonable apprehension of imminent harmful or offensive contact."

It's a CRIME!

It's also disgusting behavior! Seems that you see no issues with supporting someone who behaves in such a manner.

People like you, who would support such a low-life individual, are the reason this country is in the state it is currently in.

dirtpusher Loc: tulsa oklahoma

Architect1776 wrote:

Yeah right.
He did nothing, nothing was proven even close and the slut was caught completely fabricating the whole thing.
Let's see, trial in NYC, judge is 100% anti Trump, jurors were cherry picked for their hatred of Trump.
Sounds like a typical Soviet era show trial.
Let's see what happens once it gets out of NY.

U ment guilty as charged

flip1948 Loc: Hamden, CT

Frank T wrote:

A jury of nine citizens heard all the evidence and found it compelling.
Your allegation that she was lying appears to be a lie. What evidence do you have that she was lying?
Or, did you get your Trump panties in a bunch defending a miscreant like Trump, because you hate women?
You used to bother me with your incessant defense of Fat Donny, but now, you just amuse me.