Four Proud Boys Convicted of Sedition in Key Jan. 6 Case (Page 3): Okay well then show me where I have said that and then I agreed with that lady whoever she is and I'll apologize.

Racmanaz Loc: Sunny Tucson!

Triple G wrote:

You are now lying...or just conveniently forgetful.

Okay well then show me where I have said that and then I agreed with that lady whoever she is and I'll apologize.

Triple G

Racmanaz wrote:

Okay well then show me where I have said that and then I agreed with that lady whoever she is and I'll apologize.

No need to apologize; it's your sentiment even now that 1/6 was not an insurrection (seditious attempt to overturn democracy procedures for peaceful turnover of power.) Just finally label it for what it was and condemn those actions and you'll end up on the right side of history.

Racmanaz Loc: Sunny Tucson!

Triple G wrote:

No need to apologize; it's your sentiment even now that 1/6 was not an insurrection (seditious attempt to overturn democracy procedures for peaceful turnover of power. Just finally label it for what it was and condemn those actions.

Lol you are now changing your tune again and out what you think I or who’s words I supported. No only an uneducated moron would classified Jan 06 as an insurrection. You can keep calling an insurrection over and over again it doesn’t make a true because it’s not true. It was a freaking stupid riot.

Triple G

Racmanaz wrote:

Lol you are now changing your tune again and out what you think I or who’s words I supported. No only an uneducated moron would classified Jan 06 as an insurrection. You can keep calling an insurrection over and over again it doesn’t make a true because it’s not true. It was a freaking stupid riot.

You are not dealing with reality. You're still denying that the events of that day (not by all, but by many) are not as serious as they are. Remember that you agreed with McDaniels that the 1/6 committee should not be investigating? If the committee hadn't shut down the GOP attempted cover up (just legitimate political discourse.), there would not have been the convictions yesterday. It was a proper investigation and necessary to hold the seditious conspirators to account.

You stick to distinctions that make no difference: collusion versus conspiracy; insurrection versus seditious conspiracy. But, remember if it quacks like a duck, etc....your arguing word choice is meaningless.

https://www.businessinsider.com/rnc-ronna-mcdaniel-january-6-persecution-ordinary-citizens-legitimate-discourse-2022-2

Racmanaz Loc: Sunny Tucson!

Triple G wrote:

You are not dealing with reality. You're still de... (show quote)

Lol you keep claiming a lot about what you think I said or support, yet you are unable to back up any of those claims that you’ve made. Sorry, but it’s you that is not dealing with reality. Collusion versus conspiracy? Now you have really lost it. The so-called chopper Russia collusion conspiracy was exactly that it was a conspiracy from you lefties.

JohnFrim Loc: Somewhere in the Great White North.

“...your arguing word choice is meaningless.”

One of Rac’s finest distinguishing characteristics.

Racmanaz Loc: Sunny Tucson!

JohnFrim wrote:

“...your arguing word choice is meaningless.”

One of rac’s distinguishing characteristics.

Lol BS, it is you lunatic lefties that are always changing definitions to suit your agenda. It is you people on the left that think that there are more than two genders and can’t Tell the difference between a male and female

FrumCA

Racmanaz wrote:

I wouldn’t know if he was obsessed with them, but it seems like you guys are because you guys mentioned them more than anybody else.

Now that this trial is over, the far-left crowd have time to search for the subject of their next wet dream.

Triple G

Racmanaz wrote:

Lol BS, it is you lunatic lefties that are always changing definitions to suit your agenda. It is you people on the left that think that there are more than two genders and can’t Tell the difference between a male and female

Since you still don't agree with the labeling of "insurrection", do you agree with the jury pronouncements of "seditious conspiracy" and do you agree that it was an attempt to pervert the constitution and the peaceful transfer of power and worthy of over 50 years in jail?

Call it whatever you want. It still is what it is!

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/jury-convicts-four-leaders-proud-boys-seditious-conspiracy-related-us-capitol-breach

Effate Loc: El Dorado Hills, Ca.

gorgehiker wrote:

Maybe Yrump can get the Proud Boy convicts to sing in one of his campaign ads. If elected, Yrump can pardon the white supremacist insurrectionists and appoint them to positions in his cabinet.

Enrique Tarrio, last time I checked he was Afro/Cuban decent. Oh wait, I forgot, the left thinks Lee Elder is a “White Supremacist.”

JohnFrim Loc: Somewhere in the Great White North.

Racmanaz wrote:

Lol BS, it is you lunatic lefties that are always changing definitions to suit your agenda. It is you people on the left that think that there are more than two genders and can’t Tell the difference between a male and female

No Rac, it is YOU who does not seem to understand that there is meaning behind words; there is subtext to everything that is said; there is inference of beliefs behind statements. Riot and insurrection are different words, but when applied to 6 Jan they are absolutely synonymous in meaning. If you think of them as overlapping bubbles (Venn diagrams for the intelligent) then 6 Jan is clearly in the overlap region. Sorry if that went over your head.

Racmanaz Loc: Sunny Tucson!

JohnFrim wrote:

No Rac, it is YOU who does not seem to understand that there is meaning behind words; there is subtext to everything that is said; there is inference of beliefs behind statements. Riot and insurrection are different words, but when applied to 6 Jan they are absolutely synonymous in meaning. If you think of them as overlapping bubbles (Venn diagrams for the intelligent) then 6 Jan is clearly in the overlap region. Sorry if that went over your head.

BS, it is the left that has been changing the meanings of words and phrases to fit their warped agenda. One example is the word gender, gender has always meant by definition, male and female sex. You crazies on the left Want to add gender as something emotional and a choice.

dirtpusher Loc: tulsa oklahoma

cwp3420 wrote:

So says the biggest chupacabra mamon on here. Moron.

Boo hoo

dirtpusher Loc: tulsa oklahoma

FrumCA wrote:

Now that this trial is over, the far-left crowd have time to search for the subject of their next wet dream.

Boo hoo

Triple G

Racmanaz wrote:

BS, it is the left that has been changing the meanings of words and phrases to fit their warped agenda. One example is the word gender, gender has always meant by definition, male and female sex. You crazies on the left Want to add gender as something emotional and a choice.

Pivot!

Just answer the question as to whether you agree with the jury?