Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Full frame alternative
Page <<first <prev 3 of 4 next>
Apr 30, 2023 11:43:51   #
kenArchi Loc: Seal Beach, CA
 
Ava shows proof you do not need big cameras to get these awsome photos.

Reply
Apr 30, 2023 13:06:16   #
revhen Loc: By the beautiful Hudson
 
I'm 89 and have no problem using my Canon 80D usually with the 18-135 lens. Good exercise!

Reply
Apr 30, 2023 13:12:35   #
User ID
 
radiojohn wrote:
I agree about the OLYs, but they are drenched in "featureitis" that required you be permanently grafted to the instruction manual.

That is NOT a universal "ailment" ....
but OTOH you are certainly not alone.

Reply
 
 
Apr 30, 2023 13:16:54   #
User ID
 
imagemeister wrote:
The RX100m7 goes to 200mm equiv. .....

You really might as well build youself an automatic signature line promoting the RX100 with every post.

Reply
Apr 30, 2023 13:22:00   #
PHRubin Loc: Nashville TN USA
 
The D750 is a full frame camera. There are many steps down in size you can make. Only you can decide which is best for you.
They are:
1) Crop Frame (DX, or APS-C)
2) M4/3 (Micro Four Thirds)
3) Bridge Style in either 1/2.3" or 1"
4) P&S (High end pocketable) in either 1/2.3" or 1"

The RX100 is a fine choice in group 4. I have a Panasonic competitor, the DMC-ZS100 (I would have gotten the ZS200 if it had been out at the time.)
You need to check the size & weights of the 4 classes before I list choices in any of them.

EDIT: The last 2 categories have fixed zoom lenses, the first two take interchangeable lenses.

Reply
Apr 30, 2023 13:22:02   #
bikerguy
 
radiojohn wrote:
I agree about the OLYs, but they are drenched in "featureitis" that required you be permanently grafted to the instruction manual.


You are not forced to use all of the terrific technology built into the camera. Use what you want and ignore the rest.
The OM-1 offers many great features that you do not care about but some of us use several to many of them at various times. What you consider fearuteitis such as ProCapture I consider essential for some wildlife photography.

Enjoy the camera and ignore what you do not use.

Reply
Apr 30, 2023 13:22:11   #
Still learning69 Loc: N. Alabama
 
Nice capture there. If money is no object then i would go with a Sony mirroless either apsc or full frame . lighter and costly@ least from my point of view.

Reply
 
 
Apr 30, 2023 13:46:51   #
Jules Karney Loc: Las Vegas, Nevada
 
Gort55 wrote:
An Olympus EM-1 Mk III or an OM Systems OM-1 with 12-40 f/2.8 pro lens is smaller and weighs half as much. A lot easier on us over 80.


Good idea Gort. Great movie by the way. And War of the Worlds.

Reply
Apr 30, 2023 15:01:46   #
gwilliams6
 
revhen wrote:
I'm 89 and have no problem using my Canon 80D usually with the 18-135 lens. Good exercise!


More power to you !

Cheers and best to you.

Reply
Apr 30, 2023 15:03:02   #
gwilliams6
 
PHRubin wrote:
The D750 is a full frame camera. There are many steps down in size you can make. Only you can decide which is best for you.
They are:
1) Crop Frame (DX, or APS-C)
2) M4/3 (Micro Four Thirds)
3) Bridge Style in either 1/2.3" or 1"
4) P&S (High end pocketable) in either 1/2.3" or 1"

The RX100 is a fine choice in group 4. I have a Panasonic competitor, the DMC-ZS100 (I would have gotten the ZS200 if it had been out at the time.)
You need to check the size & weights of the 4 classes before I list choices in any of them.

EDIT: The last 2 categories have fixed zoom lenses, the first two take interchangeable lenses.
The D750 is a full frame camera. There are many st... (show quote)



Reply
Apr 30, 2023 15:04:15   #
gwilliams6
 
Still learning69 wrote:
Nice capture there. If money is no object then i would go with a Sony mirroless either apsc or full frame . lighter and costly@ least from my point of view.



Reply
 
 
Apr 30, 2023 15:37:24   #
gwilliams6
 
From one UHHer that has used ALL formats from smallest to largest (11 X 14 in. Deardorf) it all comes down to what works best for what you need, now. And certainly those needs can and sometimes do change over time.

I wont go on "a one format vs another is the best " conversation here as some looking for a "full frame alternative" ,might even suggest and extoll the virtues of the greater image resolution and detail of medium format, LOL

For me personally I have made great shots with all formats, and nowadays there are really no poor formats or poor cameras coming from the major brands

Make your choice based on any factors that matter the most to you and your work or hobby. Image quality, Depth of Field, High ISO/ Low Light performance, noise, dynamic range, autofocus, tracking, frames per second, high shutter speeds, video resolution and frame rates, focal length multiplier factor, silent shooting, rolling shutter, EVF or OVF resolution, lens selection, size, weight, ergonomics, price, etc.

There is quality gear and room for all of our choices.

Cheers and best to you all.

Reply
Apr 30, 2023 17:18:27   #
SteveTog Loc: Philly
 
Small cameras matter, but they do have to be big enough that the controls are manageable. In my mid-60's, I am finding the Fuji XT cameras for travel and casual photography. (I use the XT-2 because it's so good I have no reason to upgrade ) Along with Fuji lenses, this is a good mix of small, but not too small, manageable dials, light weight, and excellent image quality.

If buying new, I'd pick an XT5 and an 18-120 f/4 WR lens as my main travel lens. That's a moderately lightweight do everything kit, and if you add one of their lightweight primes for your low light/compact work - you've got almost every need covered.

Reply
Apr 30, 2023 19:50:57   #
timbuktutraveler
 
Ava'sPapa wrote:
I'm 75 and I just purchased an RX100 vii for a trip that our family took to Jamaica and didn't regret it one bit (that is not having a FF camera with all of the lenses to cart around). I've had Nikon's: a 610, a 750 and a 500, a Fuji X-T4 or 5, two Canon R6's. They're gone and I now have a Canon R6II with a half dozen lenses. I love it and love to using it around the homestead but when we go on trips, I stick with the point and shoot. When my wife and I went to Italy a few years back I used a Nikon A900 (which I still have) and it was a pleasure to use and I got some wall hangers from it. I also have a Sony A6000, a Sony RX10IV, an Olympus TG-5 (which I also brought to Jamaica) and a Lumix LX 7. The shining star here is the RX100vii. It has a very fast autofocus, nice colors, human and animal eye tracking, electronic viewfinder (which is VERY handy in bright sunlight)...I could go on but I'll leave that up to you to do some reading on your own. Alexander White's "The Photographer's Guide to the Sony DSC-RX100 VII" is crammed with 267 pages of great information and I would recommend that as well. I'll enclose a few pics to illustrate. Keep in mind that it can do practically anything a full size camera can do. You can shoot in manual mode, aperture or shutter priority and different auto modes depending on the situation.......................I just noticed that you mentioned non point and shoot also. In that case I would also recommend the Sony RX10IV as others have. I have and use them both. I don't think you could go wrong with either. Good luck in your pursuit.
I'm 75 and I just purchased an RX100 vii for a tri... (show quote)


I second the RX100 VII or it big Brother the RX10 IV wonderful cameras. Used them from Africa to Antatctica
with great results!!

Reply
Apr 30, 2023 20:16:30   #
gwilliams6
 
timbuktutraveler wrote:
I second the RX100 VII or it big Brother the RX10 IV wonderful cameras. Used them from Africa to Antatctica
with great results!!



Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 4 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.