When Did "Menu" become "More"?
Apr 10, 2023 08:51:27 #
Once again, Jacquie Lawson isn't working. It says that cookies are blocked. I did a search to see how to unblock them in Edge, and it says to click on "More" in the upper right. "More"? I clicked on the ..., but then step #2 was not one of the choices available. After a while, I was able to find the cookies setting, and they were enabled. Still no luck with Jacquie, so I tried Chrome.
Chrome gave me the same result - "cookies disabled." Looking for cookies directions (recipes?), I found the same type of thing, "Click on More." Remember when it was called "Menu"? When I managed to find the cookie settings, they were turned on.
After several attempts, I was able to log on to Jacquie, but the card doesn't load in either Chrome or Edge. It's just waiting and waiting and waiting. Edge has an update waiting, so maybe it will work after that.
Yes, I know Jacquie Lawson works fine for you.
Chrome gave me the same result - "cookies disabled." Looking for cookies directions (recipes?), I found the same type of thing, "Click on More." Remember when it was called "Menu"? When I managed to find the cookie settings, they were turned on.
After several attempts, I was able to log on to Jacquie, but the card doesn't load in either Chrome or Edge. It's just waiting and waiting and waiting. Edge has an update waiting, so maybe it will work after that.
Yes, I know Jacquie Lawson works fine for you.
Apr 10, 2023 09:07:43 #
Have you tried deleting your history and non essential cookies in Chrome?
Apr 10, 2023 09:18:27 #
Donwitz wrote:
Have you tried deleting your history and non essential cookies in Chrome?
I'm afraid that if I delete my history, I'll disappear.
I figure I shouldn't have to do that, but if I do, it will be a nuisance signing in to all my other sites.
Apr 10, 2023 09:19:37 #
I can see "more" being an item on a "short menu" list, where "more" may contain less used options,
But I prefer "menu" as the primary link for a list of options.
"More" seems like it would be an extension of options.
But I prefer "menu" as the primary link for a list of options.
"More" seems like it would be an extension of options.
Apr 10, 2023 09:20:19 #
Longshadow wrote:
I can see "more" being an item on a "short menu" list, where "more" may contain less used options,
But I prefer "menu" as the primary link for a list of options.
"More" seems like it would be an extension of options.
But I prefer "menu" as the primary link for a list of options.
"More" seems like it would be an extension of options.
It wouldn't hurt to use words, either.
Apr 10, 2023 09:27:50 #
jerryc41 wrote:
It wouldn't hurt to use words, either.
Oh, I think the thing now is to use as few words as possible.
Just increases the ambiguity. It's an inverse relation.
We have many words at our disposal, use them....
Apr 10, 2023 10:53:14 #
Longshadow wrote:
Oh, I think the thing now is to use as few words as possible.
Just increases the ambiguity. It's an inverse relation.
We have many words at our disposal, use them....
Just increases the ambiguity. It's an inverse relation.
We have many words at our disposal, use them....
Yes, ambiguity can be fun.
Apr 10, 2023 11:34:43 #
Apr 10, 2023 13:31:33 #
David Martin wrote:
Evidently cookies are not on the menu?
They should be. I seldom bake cookies. Cakes and pies are much easier.
Apr 11, 2023 08:40:43 #
Apr 11, 2023 09:50:00 #
re: When Did "Menu" become "More"?
When they are additional options to what is primarily presented?
Not necessarily a "menu", just "more" options.
When they are additional options to what is primarily presented?
Not necessarily a "menu", just "more" options.
Apr 11, 2023 15:23:08 #
Longshadow wrote:
re: When Did "Menu" become "More"?
When they are additional options to what is primarily presented?
Not necessarily a "menu", just "more" options.
When they are additional options to what is primarily presented?
Not necessarily a "menu", just "more" options.
Apr 12, 2023 11:26:00 #
jerryc41 wrote:
It wouldn't hurt to use words, either.
"We use 'Machine Language'. It takes us only three nanoseconds to have a full conversation."
Apr 12, 2023 11:52:30 #
Stephan G wrote:
"We use 'Machine Language'. It takes us only three nanoseconds to have a full conversation."
POP A
STO B 37F5
PSH A
Yup, very understandable.
Apr 12, 2023 12:45:07 #
Stephan G wrote:
"We use 'Machine Language'. It takes us only three nanoseconds to have a full conversation."
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.