Rich2236
Loc: E. Hampstead, New Hampshire
Sharon is, "one - in - a - million!" You are a very lucky man.
Nice photos. You are a lucky man for many reasons
Fotoartist wrote:
Any reason why you don't kill some of the yellow color?
Is there any reason you did not ask permission to alter My image without My permission?
If I had wanted it this way I would have done It.
I now have a model that is royalty P###ed off .
DID YOU Not see the please don't alter and post any of my images?
Manglesphoto wrote:
Is there any reason you did not ask permission to alter My image without My permission?
If I had wanted it this way I would have done It.
I now have a model that is royalty P###ed off .
DID YOU Not see the please don't alter and post any of my images?
First of all, I suggest you read the Terms of Use for this website. It states you have given up sole ownership of your image by posting it here.
Secondly, the rules of Fair Use apply to what I have done. It is fair use to usey images displayed on the web to convey a scholarly argument or to convey information.
Thirdly, I have previously corresponded with you in PMs about critiques of your images and you conveyed to me you were fine with it.
Enough said.
Fotoartist wrote:
First of all, I suggest you read the Terms of Use for this website. It states you have given up sole ownership of your image by posting it here.
Secondly, the rules of Fair Use apply to what I have done. It is fair use to usey images displayed on the web to convey a scholarly argument or to convey information.
Thirdly, I have corresponded with you in PMs about critiques of your images and you conveyed to me you were fine about it.
Enough said.
It is not enough said:
Common decency and sense must not be in your vocabulary:
And yes I said was fine with your Critiques.
Manglesphoto wrote:
It is not enough said:
Common decency and sense must not be in your vocabulary:
And yes I said was fine with your Critiques.
Your attack on me was most unkind, indecent, and belligerent since common sense shows that all I did was attempt to help you. I am a current professional instructor of Photoshop and I volunteer my expertise frequently. I am sorry I offered a suggestion for your Mangled photos thrust out into this public forum where you mistakenly think you still retain sacrosanct sole control. And since you brought it up, I wonder if you even know if your model really prefers being consistently portrayed as yellow.
Manglesphoto wrote:
Thank you Don
My comment is meant for your original post Frank. Just as you posted it. An excellent image.
Don
I never would have thought of using a fiberglass garage door as a diffused light source. Great idea!
Fotoartist wrote:
First of all, I suggest you read the Terms of Use for this website. It states you have given up sole ownership of your image by posting it here.
Secondly, the rules of Fair Use apply to what I have done. It is fair use to usey images displayed on the web to convey a scholarly argument or to convey information.
Thirdly, I have previously corresponded with you in PMs about critiques of your images and you conveyed to me you were fine with it.
Enough said.
Perhaps you should familiarize yourself with the "posting pictures" rules found in the Gallery.
The following from those rules applies to exactly what you have done here:
"Please do not edit and re-upload other people's pictures without their explicit permission. In other words, you may not open someone's topic, download an image, edit it (that includes adjusting settings, cropping, adding/removing visual elements, etc.), re-post it, and say "here is a version of your photo that I like better" unless they specifically ask for it."
Additionally you did this in spite of the request in the poster's sig file:
"Please don't alter my images and post them without my permission"
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.