ORpilot wrote:
Time is fleeting. You can never go back in time, only forward. So click the shutter. It preserves that moment in time.
Yes, click away is my preference. In fact I do neeed some affirmation from viewers in order to keep going. Back about five years ago when i was accepted as a contributor to Shutterstock's program, I discovered two things.
1. I will never make much money with stock photos since I do not take copious quantities of photos and because I have a mirrorless camera closer to the bottom of the line rather tham the top of the line; it is a Sony A6000.
2. While I like the nature photos I take, I will not compete well with photographers who have better cameras.
3. So, while I submit nature photos that are accepted, I have learned to take and submit photos for possible commercial use such as the one you shared of the kitchen light fixture. Here are reduced-size images of a few top sellers. Note that the the first one of the lawn after it was mowed was bought by one person for $25 USD while the one of the colored bottle tops was bought by 36 people but the total I received from that image was only $8.61 USD. Interesting comparisons. --Richard
Shooter41 wrote:
My fascination and love for photography started when I was six years old. After watching my father develop negatives in our darkened bathroom in 1947, I ordered my first camera which cost 50 cents and a Wheaties box top. My Samoyed puppy; my baseball playing older brother; my first-grade neighbor with a cap pistol and anything else that moved got their picture taken. Seventy-five years later, I realize that I take far way too many pictures and should be FAR MORE selective before I press the shutter button. I now only take a picture of something if it is both pleasing to my eye and might be interesting or attractive to someone else viewing the image for the first time. When do you think someone should go ahead and take a picture of something? The attached image of a light fixture in my kitchen was taken with my Sony A7R4 with a 70-200 Sony telephoto lens set at F2.8; 1/2000 second shutter speed; and auto ISO. The unusual shaped globe being accentuated by the straight, shiny, brass bass and tightening screws was esthetically pleasing to my eye. Would you photograph it? Shooter41
My fascination and love for photography started wh... (
show quote)
SHOOT! Electrons are cheap and you can always delete it if you don't want it. I, too, occasionally take a picture of my kitchen light fixture, not because it's fascinating, but because I'm thinking of replacing it with something different.
My philosophy is--shoot a ton of pictures and once in a great while one turns out be a winner.
Take what sparks joy. Many bemoan the fact that with digital is that since there’s no cost to taking more photos that people don’t think about what they shoot. I think there’s a flip side. Not being limited makes me think more. I can try different ideas and techniques I might not if I was paying for every shot. I never regret the shot I took that didn’t work out. I just delete it and move on. Where as I still think about shots I didn’t take.
DirtFarmer
Loc: Escaped from the NYC area, back to MA
Digital photos are ALMOST free. You already paid the capital cost by acquiring the camera and there's no significant cost to taking shots. The wear and tear on moving parts is pretty small on today's cameras.
Probably the largest cost you will encounter is your time. Assuming you value your time. You will eventually have to sort out your photos, and probably some (many) of them will need postprocessing. Being selective in your photos is probably good, but if you think you have a shot take it.
As far as bursts are concerned, there is a time and a place for them. Action shots where you cannot anticipate the exact moment of the best shot. Bracketed shots on a camera that will run the bracket at full speed, then stop. Beyond, those types of things there is little reason to use bursts.
With the cheap c I st of cards shoot away
With the cheap cost of cards shoot away
profbowman wrote:
Yes, click away is my preference. In fact I do neeed some affirmation from viewers in order to keep going. Back about five years ago when i was accepted as a contributor to Shutterstock's program, I discovered two things.
1. I will never make much money with stock photos since I do not take copious quantities of photos and because I have a mirrorless camera closer to the bottom of the line rather tham the top of the line; it is a Sony A6000.
2. While I like the nature photos I take, I will not compete well with photographers who have better cameras.
3. So, while I submit nature photos that are accepted, I have learned to take and submit photos for possible commercial use such as the one you shared of the kitchen light fixture. Here are reduced-size images of a few top sellers. Note that the the first one of the lawn after it was mowed was bought by one person for $25 USD while the one of the colored bottle tops was bought by 36 people but the total I received from that image was only $8.61 USD. Interesting comparisons. --Richard
Yes, click away is my preference. In fact I do nee... (
show quote)
Oops!! Here is the picture I meant to attch to my previous comment. --Richard
Shooter41 wrote:
My fascination and love for photography started when I was six years old. After watching my father develop negatives in our darkened bathroom in 1947, I ordered my first camera which cost 50 cents and a Wheaties box top. My Samoyed puppy; my baseball playing older brother; my first-grade neighbor with a cap pistol and anything else that moved got their picture taken. Seventy-five years later, I realize that I take far way too many pictures and should be FAR MORE selective before I press the shutter button. I now only take a picture of something if it is both pleasing to my eye and might be interesting or attractive to someone else viewing the image for the first time. When do you think someone should go ahead and take a picture of something? The attached image of a light fixture in my kitchen was taken with my Sony A7R4 with a 70-200 Sony telephoto lens set at F2.8; 1/2000 second shutter speed; and auto ISO. The unusual shaped globe being accentuated by the straight, shiny, brass bass and tightening screws was esthetically pleasing to my eye. Would you photograph it? Shooter41
My fascination and love for photography started wh... (
show quote)
I don't know why...but I like this image: it is simple...clear...has contrast...pleasing shapes, colors, shiny textures...It conveys a peaceful feeling. Nothing really interesting but just highly pleasant!
Shooter41 wrote:
My fascination and love for photography started when I was six years old. After watching my father develop negatives in our darkened bathroom in 1947, I ordered my first camera which cost 50 cents and a Wheaties box top. My Samoyed puppy; my baseball playing older brother; my first-grade neighbor with a cap pistol and anything else that moved got their picture taken. Seventy-five years later, I realize that I take far way too many pictures and should be FAR MORE selective before I press the shutter button. I now only take a picture of something if it is both pleasing to my eye and might be interesting or attractive to someone else viewing the image for the first time. When do you think someone should go ahead and take a picture of something? The attached image of a light fixture in my kitchen was taken with my Sony A7R4 with a 70-200 Sony telephoto lens set at F2.8; 1/2000 second shutter speed; and auto ISO. The unusual shaped globe being accentuated by the straight, shiny, brass bass and tightening screws was esthetically pleasing to my eye. Would you photograph it? Shooter41
My fascination and love for photography started wh... (
show quote)
No one should tell another when to press the shutter button. Taking a photograph is a personal thing. Whatever you want to photograph, do it.
ecurb
Loc: Metro Chicago Area
Shooter41 wrote:
My fascination and love for photography started when I was six years old. After watching my father develop negatives in our darkened bathroom in 1947, I ordered my first camera which cost 50 cents and a Wheaties box top. My Samoyed puppy; my baseball playing older brother; my first-grade neighbor with a cap pistol and anything else that moved got their picture taken. Seventy-five years later, I realize that I take far way too many pictures and should be FAR MORE selective before I press the shutter button. I now only take a picture of something if it is both pleasing to my eye and might be interesting or attractive to someone else viewing the image for the first time. When do you think someone should go ahead and take a picture of something? The attached image of a light fixture in my kitchen was taken with my Sony A7R4 with a 70-200 Sony telephoto lens set at F2.8; 1/2000 second shutter speed; and auto ISO. The unusual shaped globe being accentuated by the straight, shiny, brass bass and tightening screws was esthetically pleasing to my eye. Would you photograph it? Shooter41
My fascination and love for photography started wh... (
show quote)
Press the shutter at the decisive moment.
Shooter41 wrote:
My fascination and love for photography started when I was six years old. After watching my father develop negatives in our darkened bathroom in 1947, I ordered my first camera which cost 50 cents and a Wheaties box top. My Samoyed puppy; my baseball playing older brother; my first-grade neighbor with a cap pistol and anything else that moved got their picture taken. Seventy-five years later, I realize that I take far way too many pictures and should be FAR MORE selective before I press the shutter button. I now only take a picture of something if it is both pleasing to my eye and might be interesting or attractive to someone else viewing the image for the first time. When do you think someone should go ahead and take a picture of something? The attached image of a light fixture in my kitchen was taken with my Sony A7R4 with a 70-200 Sony telephoto lens set at F2.8; 1/2000 second shutter speed; and auto ISO. The unusual shaped globe being accentuated by the straight, shiny, brass bass and tightening screws was esthetically pleasing to my eye. Would you photograph it? Shooter41
My fascination and love for photography started wh... (
show quote)
Yes, but I would compose more carefully. Good exposure.
Shoot freely, re-enjoy the pictures when editing, edit heavily, randomly fix what you feel like fixing, file them away, do not bother with back up. It is better than watching TV, or pointlessly exercising.
Post what you want to share, expect flack, and do not give a s--t what other people think - after you are retired.
Boris
Is it quantity vs quality? Or just because I can do it?
R.G. wrote:
Shoot first, ask questions later. Once you have the shot, then you can decide if you're going to keep it, share it, hang it or whatever, but you have to have it first. Culling can be done in the comfort of your own home, but a missed opportunity is gone forever.
Once you've paid for your (reusable) SD card, digital negatives are free. You can thin out the obvious rejects straight away and take your time with the rest. Don't get too precious about it and learn to be brutal when necessary, or you'll end up with an SSD/HD full of dross. Being brutal will keep you honest and grounded.
Your results should fall into three categories - the definites, the maybes and the definitely nots. Get rid of the last group straight away and take your time with the second group. Edit the first group straight away and store the results in a special place.
Shoot first, ask questions later. Once you have t... (
show quote)
Dear R.G. Thank you for your helpful and inciteful reply. You just described what I have been doing this entire 43rd season that I shot all of the home games for the Wichita Wings Professional Indoor Soccer Team as usual. It has allowed me to carve out my own special niche in high action sports indoor photography and helped me continue to make a lot of progress increasing my photographic knowledge since I shot my first wings game in 1980 and later when I bought my Sony A7R4 and used it for the first time on 6-5-21. The enclosed image was shot before I really knew my new camera. It would have been a lot sharper had I known to set the shutter speed at 1/2000 rather than the 1/640 that made the soccer ball slightly blurred. I am excited because I plan to shoot the entire game on RAW on March 11, 2023 and see how many keepers I can take. I will be sharing images from this entire past season in my "2023 Wings Players Autograph Book" I have published and give to each of the players as well as each of the coaches, trainers, owners, announcers and all support staff, every year. I like to show them my appreciation for being allowed to get into every home game free to enjoy having my own special location at the games to enjoy sharing my love for the team and freedom to come and go and rub elbows with the players at will. Shooter41
In the film days (when rather broke!), I thought too much and still regret a few images I let go by. With digital, (not so broke anymore!) not so much...
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.