Mr. Pelosi Attacked
JRiepe wrote:
What you believe happened may be true but for me I have doubts that what you believe is the whole story. I don't condone violence and do know right from wrong but if I believed everything I read and everything I was told and didn't question anything I'd be a shallow gullible individual that could be led anywhere. Is it wrong that I question the lying corrupt media?
Fine. I don’t know the whole story either. But, think for just a brief moment.
If Paul was a homosexual and picked a homosexual partner, to share in his passion, with or without Nancy’s consent, would he attach himself to a degenerate, Nancy hating, conspiracy driven, nut job, way out of his social class; or would he engage with a solid, upper class elite, who knows digression, and would fit in with his lifestyle.
This is ridiculous, and again, is indicative of Republican hate—without reason or thought.
He was attacked by an idiot, in his home—not a degenerate lover. Blind bias confirmation is ugly.
Overthehill1 wrote:
Really got under your skin, didn't I dipshit? It's a skill I learned from dealing with willfully stupid and terminally gullible assholes like yourself during 37 years as a working journalist. Now post some idiotic reply that will make you feel better, but it won't change anyone's opinion that you are one of the pre-eminent (that means one of the biggest) assholes on this site.
I love it when failed newspaper reporters who couldn’t make it in their profession because of their lack of language skills have to lash out like little children. I’m glad I could contribute just a little bit in you having a shitty day, faux Clark Kent wanna be.
Kmgw9v wrote:
The simple explanation is the crazy man was simply after Nancy. Your theories are meaningless. What’s the point?
The crazy man wasn’t after Nancy, 9 volt. He wanted to make sure Nancy wouldn’t catch them in their little sexual dalliance they had going on.
gorgehiker wrote:
You do not know me. I do not support violence on either side. Steve Scalise was not shot by someone anything like me. I do not own a gun and would not know how to use one. I have never committed an act of violence. Unlike many on this forum, I have never promoted violence of any kind.
Supreme Court Justices should not be harassed. At least none of them or their families have been violently attacked with a hammer. The worst is that the right has to do immediate damage control before the 82 year old victim is even out of surgery promoting salacious stories about the victim.
You do not know me. I do not support violence on ... (
show quote)
None have been attacked by a hammer, but one crazy was arrested by Kavanaugh’s home, George, with a loaded firearm, and yet you in your bigotry never condemned that, did you, flamer? No one would have known about Paul Pelosi’s pulsing pink hammer if he hadn’t been in a menoage a trois tryst with two fellow gay San Franciscan homos.
gorgehiker wrote:
You are really overestimating the right wingers on this site if you expect them to actually have evidence to support their crazy conspiracy theories.
Like you flaming lunatics and your proof of Trump colluding with Russia? You’re such a good left wing flaming lunatic, Georgie.
cwp3420 wrote:
The crazy man wasn’t after Nancy, 9 volt. He wanted to make sure Nancy wouldn’t catch them in their little sexual dalliance they had going on.
So, the crazy men decides to kill Nancy’s husband in their own home—to keep their relationship a secret. That makes a lot of sense. Nonsense and crap.
Why do you continue with the names? It is childish
rmalarz wrote:
Dark humor is like food. Not everyone gets it.
--Bob
Unfortunately, it's not enough like food. If you don't get food, you die.
Kmgw9v wrote:
So, the crazy men decides to kill Nancy’s husband in their own home—to keep their relationship a secret. That makes a lot of sense. Nonsense and crap.
Why do you continue with the names? It is childish
It’s childish for you left wing liberals to always defend corrupt left winger politicians doing corruptible things, and yet if they’re Republicans, you go all ape shit and refute any facts in the case. It’s also hypocritical of you to say others shouldn’t call anyone names, when you do it all the time, 9 volt.
cwp3420 wrote:
It’s childish for you left wing liberals to always defend corrupt left winger politicians doing corruptible things, and yet if they’re Republicans, you go all ape shit and refute any facts in the case. It’s also hypocritical of you to say others shouldn’t call anyone names, when you do it all the time, 9 volt.
Who have I directly called a name? No one.
Architect1776 wrote:
How can the only 2 people in the house , both gay lovers, both having a lovers spat. So where is the unknown assailant?
You get more out of control with each passing day.
If you had kept up with the news today you would know that none of what you typed above is true
True does not matter to caricatures...
cwp3420 wrote:
I love it when failed newspaper reporters who couldn’t make it in their profession because of their lack of language skills have to lash out like little children. I’m glad I could contribute just a little bit in you having a shitty day, faux Clark Kent wanna be.
He's back. And still has problems understanding what he reads.
cwp3420 wrote:
I love it when failed newspaper reporters who couldn’t make it in their profession because of their lack of language skills have to lash out like little children. I’m glad I could contribute just a little bit in you having a shitty day, faux Clark Kent wanna be.
Careful.....he's real sensitive, and pre-eminent.....
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.