I hesitate to mention this, but they operate in Auto, not Manual, mode.
Now if Adobe, ON1 and all the other post software companies made apps for Virtual Reality goggles we could all buy those then argue about who does the best PRE processing software.
fhayes wrote:
Always controversial
Fine, notice that as time passes even seconds later the image changes and at times substantially in the memory card. I believe most camera cards the image seems to remain as taken regardless of the passage of time.
Also very difficult still to print or share on social media the image on the memory card the eye is saving to.
leftj wrote:
Sounds like junk science to me.
Perfect fodder for UHH ...
cdayton wrote:
I hesitate to mention this, but they operate in Auto, not Manual, mode.
Perhaps in a way.
You could just as easily say they operate in full manual with deep data capture fed into massive processing.
Longshadow wrote:
But they are stereoscopic... Does that mean combined they are 1,152 MP?
But this assumes that both process an image equally. Aka lack of amblyopia (like i have).
Good info.
Humans don't have the (luxury) of going down to the photo shop (Or Amazon.com),
to purchase a newer, upgraded lens, whenever the old one is failing, or to mount
a telephoto or Doubler, if the need arises, when our eyes start to fail us.
Technology has come a long way, but there is still no corrective lens that can replace the human
eye, when Macular degeneration starts to take away vision in the human eye. (Maybe someday).
Hopefully, sooner, than later.
ecobin wrote:
Additionally, the eye is connected to a brain which interprets the light coming through - the camera's sensor is connected to a processor which interprets the light based on a computer algorithm which is minuscule compared to a living brain.
I had my lenses replaced also.
I now need reading glasses but other then that all is great.
Just about everyone that I've talked to that had their eye lenses replaced also had to get reading glasses also.
Curious, how about you.
Charles
Good thought.
I'm surprised that the new Google Camera, doesn't have those features now.
(Maybe they do). I'll stick with my old flip phone and my back up, Nikon D3400.
Hopefully, Santa will bring me a new Nikon 7500 this year.......(If he has the bucks).
(when in doubt), The old "granny knot" is always helpful when in a rush.
(Or if it's nylon), try melting the string at the end, into a nice blob of plastic that fits the hole in the cap.
You got that right.
Just like the rechargeable battery in the camera. If it's depleted, the "camera eye" sensor, is out to lunch.
God puts a permanent battery inside the sensors of the brain. (It's a lifetime guarantee). I'll keep the original
sensors that He gave me. (at 75 years), it's still working fine, although I have upgraded the optics every 2 years).
Interesting.
My wife has macular degeneration, to one eye, and she has lost her ability to drive (safely).
There is no surgery to fix the problem. (it's progressively) turning to darkness over time.
(I'm looking for a seeing eye dog that can drive her around.)
I guess I'm elected, till they certify dogs to drive.
fhayes wrote:
Always controversial
rant rant and one more rant just for giggles.
interesting post, thanks for sharing.
bruce
JBuckley wrote:
Interesting.
My wife has macular degeneration, to one eye, and she has lost her ability to drive (safely).
There is no surgery to fix the problem. (it's progressively) turning to darkness over time.
(I'm looking for a seeing eye dog that can drive her around.)
I guess I'm elected, till they certify dogs to drive.
I was taking care of my late wife's Dog Guide (Proper Term) while doing a forensic investigation of some construction work while she was in the hospital.
While eating lunch with the harnessed dog a couple of workers approached me and asked about the dog. I let them know he was a Leader Dog for the blind. They thought about it then asked how I was able to take photos, I said the camera was auto focus so they paused and then asked how I drove. I replied that the dog would lean left to turn left and visa versa. To stop he would dig his claws into my leg.
They looked amazed, nodded and left discussing the amazing dog.
Oh well.
Fredrick
Loc: Former NYC, now San Francisco Bay Area
DirtFarmer wrote:
I had cataracts replaced last year. When they did the first one, I could clearly see a difference between the two eyes in terms of white balance. During the week between the procedures, by the time they did the other eye, the difference had faded. My post processor had modified the white balance of the old eye to match the new eye.
The eye is only the sensor. It's the post processor that does the 'seeing'.
Fortunately, even at my advanced age, the post processor is still capable of learning.
I had cataracts replaced last year. When they did ... (
show quote)
How do you like your new cataracts?
I had cataract surgery as well two years ago, and had a similar experience. However, I didn’t notice the difference in white balance fading between the two weeks of my two surgeries … so I guess my processor is slower than yours.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.