Funny Thing About Democrats.....
SteveR wrote:
But you don't debunk my claim of Republicans filing 73 lawsuits before these midterms and being highly successful.
Provide some specifics, snd I'll comment.
SteveR wrote:
Take Pennsylvania for example, where the PA Supreme Court overrode the legislature, against the state Constitution, on the running of the election. Prior to these mid-terms, however, Republicans have been pro-active, filing over 70 lawsuits to keep Dem shenanigans in check.
Yes we have and the dems are fighting tooth and nail to cheat and harvest ballots again this time.
PS we have been winning some as well.
Architect1776 wrote:
Yes we have and the dems are fighting tooth and nail to cheat and harvest ballots again this time.
Still more obsession with "harvesting ballots" --- which, again, is merely a way to make it easier for people to vote.
dennis2146 wrote:
You don't recall at all how Sleazy Harry Reid used to take Republican sponsored Bills and put them on the bottom of the pile so they would not even be brought up to be voted upon? Golly Gee Whiz, what a terrible memory you have when it suits your lying corrupt Left Wing agenda.
Dennis
I know I didn't fart so, your dinner is NOT ready!
Go back to sleep until then.
Architect1776 wrote:
Yes we have and the dems are fighting tooth and nail to cheat and harvest ballots again this time.
PS we have been winning some as well.
I'm pretty sure there are MANY here that are STILL WAITING for you to provide solid PROOF of your idiotic claim.
scooter1 wrote:
When you have to lie about what the other person said it tells me 2 things. #1 you know that what you are trying to get people to believe is pure B.S. and #2 you'll start saying things are fact even though you know they're not. There was nothing ever mentioned about Fox until you lied about it. Now you've posted 3 instances about fraud out of many and are thinking I will believe it as fact. You'll need to up your game and quit the lying before you will ever get intelligent people to consider your argument valid.
When you have to lie about what the other person s... (
show quote)
And when did I lie??
scooter1 wrote:
There have been numerous arrests for voter fraud. Try reading something other than watching CNN.
(later)
Did you ever think that if it was only 10 votes that we would never have heard of it. That wouldn't even make CNN news much less national.
And I responded
Quote:
That's your argument???? Fox News wouldn't have talked about voter fraud if it wasn't true??
So,
YOU said that these arrests would not be on CNN. So, I assumed you meant they WERE covered by the Right-wing media (for which we can use "Fox News" as a shorthand).
I then merely pointed out the very true fact that Fox News (and AON and NewsMax et al), would repeat anything that Trump said. That, by itself, would NOT be enough to prove those allegations to be true.
To prove the points I was making, I included links to articles showing a) a "big" voting scam in a local election in a small town, and b) several people (all Trump voters), voting twice, yielding just handful of fraudulent votes.
If you have any
proof of widespread voter fraud, or even minor voter fraud commited by a Democrat in a national election, please share it.
Several GOPers running now have already indicated they will accept the results if they win but will claim fraud if they lose.
JamesCurran wrote:
So, YOU said that these arrests would not be on CNN. So, I assumed you meant they WERE covered by the Right-wing media (for which we can use "Fox News" as a shorthand).
I then merely pointed out the very true fact that Fox News (and AON and NewsMax et al), would repeat anything that Trump said. That, by itself, would NOT be enough to prove those allegations to be true.
To prove the points I was making, I included links to articles showing a) a "big" voting scam in a local election in a small town, and b) several people (all Trump voters), voting twice, yielding just handful of fraudulent votes.
If you have any proof of widespread voter fraud, or even minor voter fraud commited by a Democrat in a national election, please share it.
So, b YOU /b said that these arrests would not b... (
show quote)
His "proof" is that the orange monkey said there was voter fraud. That's all he cares to know.
https://wisconsinwatch.org/2022/10/did-the-wisconsin-legislatures-2020-election-integrity-probe-find-evidence-of-widespread-voter-fraud/The answer is "NO!"
https://www.brennancenter.org/issues/ensure-every-american-can-vote/vote-suppression/myth-voter-fraudhttps://www.npr.org/2022/09/04/1120904265/claims-voter-fraud-donald-trump
JamesCurran wrote:
So, YOU said that these arrests would not be on CNN. So, I assumed you meant they WERE covered by the Right-wing media (for which we can use "Fox News" as a shorthand).
I then merely pointed out the very true fact that Fox News (and AON and NewsMax et al), would repeat anything that Trump said. That, by itself, would NOT be enough to prove those allegations to be true.
To prove the points I was making, I included links to articles showing a) a "big" voting scam in a local election in a small town, and b) several people (all Trump voters), voting twice, yielding just handful of fraudulent votes.
If you have any proof of widespread voter fraud, or even minor voter fraud commited by a Democrat in a national election, please share it.
So, b YOU /b said that these arrests would not b... (
show quote)
Seriously? That's your argument???? Fox News wouldn't have talked about voter fraud if it was true??
Now act like you didn't say that. You did assume (and we all know what they say about assume) and not only assumed you stated that my "argument" was "Fox News wouldn't have talked about voter fraud if it was true??". In case you can't comprehend it you said I was talking fox news. It's obvious you used that reference to belittle anyone who watches fox news. Now try to deny the lying again.
And little boo pussy pipes up with more B.S. You kind of lose any credibility with the "orange monkey" comment which is another lie just like Curran. When you two have to lie about what someone says you immediately lose any credibility you may have had. Why do you liberals have to lie and put words in some ones mouth to try to win an argument. Pathetic. If you can't argue with the truth why argue??
lenben wrote:
Several GOPers running now have already indicated they will accept the results if they win but will claim fraud if they lose.
WTF are you talking about, can you link such quotes or video?
scooter1 wrote:
And little boo pussy pipes up with more B.S. You kind of lose any credibility with the "orange monkey" comment which is another lie just like Curran. When you two have to lie about what someone says you immediately lose any credibility you may have had. Why do you liberals have to lie and put words in some ones mouth to try to win an argument. Pathetic. If you can't argue with the truth why argue??
When you are a Chump Monkey, you know EXACTLY who the Orange Monkey is. Too bad you refuse to own it.
It's YOU and all the other losers who swoon over him and can't see him for what he truly is.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.