Funny Thing About Democrats.....
Oct 28, 2022 11:55:52 #
Fotoartist wrote:
Gee, you are right. Most Republicans are obstructi... (show quote)
Now you're talking. Republicans WILL and SHOULD do all they can to block every bit of the Democratic agenda to seize power from We the People.
Dennis
Oct 28, 2022 12:01:10 #
BooIsMyCat
Loc: Somewhere
SteveS wrote:
Remember a guy by the of name Harry Reid? One of the biggest obstructionists to ever serve as Senate Majority Leader. McConnell is a lightweight compared to Dirty Harry.
McConnell is an opportunist when it suits his agenda and an obstructionist when it doesn't.
Reid is gone and I can't remember him obstructing ANY bill from 2008 to the present. That's ALL you hear about Moscow Mitch.
Oct 28, 2022 12:02:55 #
BooIsMyCat wrote:
McConnell is an opportunist when it suits his agenda and an obstructionist when it doesn't.
Reid is gone and I can't remember him obstructing ANY bill from 2008 to the present. That's ALL you hear about Moscow Mitch.
Reid is gone and I can't remember him obstructing ANY bill from 2008 to the present. That's ALL you hear about Moscow Mitch.
You don't recall at all how Sleazy Harry Reid used to take Republican sponsored Bills and put them on the bottom of the pile so they would not even be brought up to be voted upon? Golly Gee Whiz, what a terrible memory you have when it suits your lying corrupt Left Wing agenda.
Dennis
Oct 28, 2022 12:11:17 #
dennis2146 wrote:
You mean like Hillary Clinton and Stacy Abrams? Glad you posted.
Dennis
Dennis
Not too bright, huh, troll boy!
Oct 28, 2022 12:12:18 #
dennis2146 wrote:
Now you're talking. Republicans WILL and SHOULD do all they can to block every bit of the Democratic agenda to seize power from We the People.
Dennis
Now you're talking. Republicans WILL and SHOULD do all they can to block every bit of the Democratic agenda to seize power from We the People.
Dennis
Yeah, you the trumpette traitors!
Oct 28, 2022 12:22:22 #
BooIsMyCat wrote:
McConnell is an opportunist when it suits his agenda and an obstructionist when it doesn't.
Reid is gone and I can't remember him obstructing ANY bill from 2008 to the present. That's ALL you hear about Moscow Mitch.
Reid is gone and I can't remember him obstructing ANY bill from 2008 to the present. That's ALL you hear about Moscow Mitch.
You have been asleep under a rock if you don't remember Hairy Reed's Marxist control of Obama's agenda.
He repeatedly blocked proceedings to vote on a fence for the southern border.
Here is one example. He voted against proceeding to a vote on S 2146 - the Stop Sanctuary Policies and Protect Americans Act by a vote of 54-45. The bill proposed withholding federal funding from "sanctuary jurisdictions" that violate the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 and other federal immigration laws. In addition, the bill proposed increasing "penalties for individuals who illegally reenter the United States after being removed" and providing "liability protection for State and local law enforcement who cooperate with Federal law enforcement."[39] Reid voted with 41 Democrats, one Republican and two Independents against proceeding to the bill.[40]
https://ballotpedia.org/Harry_Reid
Oct 28, 2022 13:08:45 #
Funny thing about Democrats, Blurry? I don't find them the least bit funny. Putrid, maybe, funny, no.
Oct 28, 2022 13:17:16 #
Blurryeyed wrote:
When they get wiped out in the Midterms, they won't blame themselves, they won't consider that the country has rejected their policies and initiatives, they won't change their agenda, they won't work with the new congress....... They will blame Trump and simply insult their fellow Americans who rejected them.
When the GOP got wiped out in 2020, they didn't blame their cultish support for their Orange God.
They instead insist on massive voter fraud --- with absolutely ZERO evidence any occurred.
Oct 28, 2022 13:59:41 #
SteveS wrote:
Remember a guy by the of name Harry Reid? One of the biggest obstructionists to ever serve as Senate Majority Leader. McConnell is a lightweight compared to Dirty Harry.
That is so true.
I was embarrassed to have him as my Senator when I lived in NV.
Oct 28, 2022 16:04:37 #
BooIsMyCat wrote:
McConnell is an opportunist when it suits his agenda and an obstructionist when it doesn't.
Reid is gone and I can't remember him obstructing ANY bill from 2008 to the present. That's ALL you hear about Moscow Mitch.
Reid is gone and I can't remember him obstructing ANY bill from 2008 to the present. That's ALL you hear about Moscow Mitch.
Trump is gone too, but that doesn't stop your daily rant and ravings about him.
Oct 28, 2022 16:11:10 #
JamesCurran wrote:
When the GOP got wiped out in 2020, they didn't blame their cultish support for their Orange God.
They instead insist on massive voter fraud --- with absolutely ZERO evidence any occurred.
They instead insist on massive voter fraud --- with absolutely ZERO evidence any occurred.
Saying there's absolutely ZERO evidence is gas-lighting. There was evidence of fraud but little conviction to find out how much there was since we as a country were not about to overturn the election (no matter how loudly they talk about "THE INSURECTION".
No one in authority had the stomach to go looking for the truth. But you can keep shouting Zero! Evidence!, Jimmy, if it makes you feel better.
Oct 28, 2022 16:11:33 #
SteveS wrote:
Trump is gone too, but that doesn't stop your daily rant and ravings about him.
Why are there Pub candidates crapping their pants to get or keep his endorsement if he is so "gone?"
Oct 28, 2022 16:49:03 #
DaveO wrote:
Why are there Pub candidates crapping their pants to get or keep his endorsement if he is so "gone?"
That is their prerogative, there are also Republicans that don't want his endorsement. The same can be said about Obama, some Democrats want his endorsement, some don't. Either way neither of them currently hold a public office.
Oct 28, 2022 16:55:52 #
SteveS wrote:
That is their prerogative, there are also Republicans that don't want his endorsement. The same can be said about Obama, some Democrats want his endorsement, some don't. Either way neither of them currently hold a public office.
Your answer has nothing to do with my statement. Now you change your story to include holding a public office...gee, what a revelation. You essentially stated he is gone and it is simply not true due to the influence he still exerts.
Oct 28, 2022 17:10:08 #
InfiniteISO wrote:
Saying there's absolutely ZERO evidence is gas-lighting. There was evidence of fraud but little conviction to find out how much there was since we as a country were not about to overturn the election (no matter how loudly they talk about "THE INSURECTION".
And clearly, you're the one who's been gaslit.
Did you hear about the 64 lawsuits filed by the Trump campaign, challenging the results of the elections --- ALL of which failed, with most being dismissed for lack of evidence?
Did you hear about the numerous recounts across the country, NONE of which changed any race?
Did you hear about the "forensic audit" in Arizona (conducted by a person whose only qualification was that he was convinced there was fraud) which couldn't find any fraud?
Just because no one has found evidence supporting your position doesn't mean no one has looked for it. (It means there is none because your position is a fantasy)
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.