flip1948 wrote:
Not on this planet.
Yup, you already proved that, Comrade.
Racmanaz wrote:
The Durham's investigations intent was to look into the origin of the Trump Russia investigation.
No. The Durham investigation's intent was to find impropriety in the origin of the Trump-Russia investigation, and in that, it failed miserably.
Racmanaz wrote:
Yup, you already proved that, Comrade.
Cite the proof you lying hypocrite.
JamesCurran wrote:
No. The Durham investigation's intent was to find impropriety in the origin of the Trump-Russia investigation, and in that, it failed miserably.
Lol That's what I just said minus the word "impropriety" which was basically implied anyways. And no you're wrong as usual it did not fail it actually succeeded the liar. You know what really failed?? Here is one headline..."
Mueller finds no collusion with Russia.."
flip1948 wrote:
Cite the proof you lying hypocrite.
You ALREADY proved it with your own words you Russian sympathizer communist.
Racmanaz wrote:
You ALREADY proved it with your own words you Russian sympathizer communist.
Still trying to get booted out of UHH? Look at Sean Spicer’s debrief on Durham on NewsMax. It’s just your speed.
Triple G wrote:
Still trying to get booted out of UHH? Look at Sean Spicer’s debrief on Durham on NewsMax. It’s just your speed.
Lol once again, what does other people's opinions have to do with the intent of Durham's investigation??? You keep repeating the same stupid crap.
Racmanaz wrote:
Lol That's what I just said minus the word "impropriety" which was basically implied anyways. And no you're wrong as usual it did not fail it actually succeeded the liar. You know what really failed?? Here is one headline..."Mueller finds no collusion with Russia.."
Obviously, it was not "implied" (I wanted to write "IMPROPRIETY" in all caps, but I was on my phone), because that word makes all the difference. And it's why Durham failed miserably. He claimed three minor offenses from three bit players -- and TWO of them were found innocent! In the end, he found the Mueller Investigation was completely properly handled.
And Mueller never said he found no collusion with Russia. He said that, due to so many people in Trump's Administration who lied or obstructed Justice (several of whom went to prison for it), it was impossible to know exactly what happened.
JamesCurran wrote:
Obviously, it was not "implied" (I wanted to write "IMPROPRIETY" in all caps, but I was on my phone), because that word makes all the difference. And it's why Durham failed miserably. He claimed three minor offenses from three bit players -- and TWO of them were found innocent! In the end, he found the Mueller Investigation was completely properly handled.
And Mueller never said he found no collusion with Russia. He said that, due to so many people in Trump's Administration who lied or obstructed Justice (several of whom went to prison for it), it was impossible to know exactly what happened.
Obviously, it was not "implied" (I wante... (
show quote)
You had a crooked and now disgraced president, hiring a crooked ass-kisser as the AG, hiring a lawyer to find evidence of corruption in the FBI and DOJ for no other reason than the crooked ex-president wanting revenge on people who slighted him in any way.
One of the primary campaign promises from this crooked and disgraced ex-president was that he was going to put Hillary in jail.... that didn't work out so well for him though, did it? Even after he put his radical loyalists in key positions in government, he failed to do what was most important to him.
This crooked, disgraced ex-president, twice impeached, and failing at every turn, wanted to be looked upon as a current day Al Capone. He failed miserably at that also. He is just a rich, spoiled brat who can't accept losing. The funny thing is, he IS A LOSER!
JamesCurran wrote:
Obviously, it was not "implied" (I wanted to write "IMPROPRIETY" in all caps, but I was on my phone), because that word makes all the difference. And it's why Durham failed miserably. He claimed three minor offenses from three bit players -- and TWO of them were found innocent! In the end, he found the Mueller Investigation was completely properly handled.
And Mueller never said he found no collusion with Russia. He said that, due to so many people in Trump's Administration who lied or obstructed Justice (several of whom went to prison for it), it was impossible to know exactly what happened.
Obviously, it was not "implied" (I wante... (
show quote)
Oh so you think the Durham's investigation failed its intent but the Russian investigation from Mueller did not fail in its attempt? Liberal aren't you? In fact the molar investigation proved that Trump did not collude with Russia as a matter of fact Mueller said not one American was found to collude with Russia. So if not one American that includes Trump. The Mueller investigation failed in its intent but the Durham's investigation succeeded in his attempt. Why do you have to deny this and lie about it?
Seriously what the hell is wrong with you? I don't care what anybody's opinion on it I care about the intent of the Durham's investigation itself. Are you intellectually challenged?
BooIsMyCat wrote:
You had a crooked and now disgraced president, hiring a crooked ass-kisser as the AG, hiring a lawyer to find evidence of corruption in the FBI and DOJ for no other reason than the crooked ex-president wanting revenge on people who slighted him in any way.
One of the primary campaign promises from this crooked and disgraced ex-president was that he was going to put Hillary in jail.... that didn't work out so well for him though, did it? Even after he put his radical loyalists in key positions in government, he failed to do what was most important to him.
This crooked, disgraced ex-president, twice impeached, and failing at every turn, wanted to be looked upon as a current day Al Capone. He failed miserably at that also. He is just a rich, spoiled brat who can't accept losing. The funny thing is, he IS A LOSER!
You had a crooked and now disgraced president, hir... (
show quote)
Looks like you're intellectually challenged and disingenuous and a liar. You're claiming that Trump hired an attorney general that kisses his butt? All indications prove that you are a liar. You really want to know who was the butt kisser? That was Obama's attorney general Eric Holder.
Racmanaz wrote:
Looks like you're intellectually challenged and disingenuous and a liar. You're claiming that Trump hired an attorney general that kisses his butt?
Absolutely. Barr wrote an article about the absolute power of the presidency. Many consider it an audition to be Attorney General. Two weeks later, Trump appointed him. Up until the point when Trump lost the election, Barr did everything Trump wanted. (After Trump lost, Barr realized that Trump was of no value anymore, and actually started to tell the truth).
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.