Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
The Attic
Killer Joe Has Set Yet Another Record.....!!!
Page <<first <prev 10 of 15 next> last>>
Sep 21, 2022 10:03:40   #
Racmanaz Loc: Sunny Tucson!
 
JohnFrim wrote:
Wow, you finally figured it out. Yes to all of the above!!!


Lol ya not surprised that you believe in such conspiracies.

Reply
Sep 21, 2022 10:44:53   #
JohnFrim Loc: Somewhere in the Great White North.
 
Racmanaz wrote:
Lol ya not surprised that you believe in such conspiracies.


Conspiracies aside, I am curious as to your thoughts on the classified documents... is Trump guilty of a no-no?

Before you answer let me state that I believe that even if Trump SAID he WANTS something declassified it REMAINS CLASSIFIED until the declassification notice is put on the document. You could argue that the declassification occurs at the time of his statement, but there would have to be documented evidence that he said that at a particular point in time. This allows for a delay between his request and the processing of the document. But keep in mind that there are multiple copies of a document, so surely SOME of those copies would have been processed, right? If so then the agencies that hold those declassified documents should be coming to his defence... but nothing so far.

I think he is guilty, but I am not sure Garland will go through with the unprecedented step of charging Trump. As you know, I think he should be charged and his tailor should be sending the jailhouse his measurements for an orange suit.

Reply
Sep 21, 2022 12:56:17   #
Racmanaz Loc: Sunny Tucson!
 
JohnFrim wrote:
Conspiracies aside, I am curious as to your thoughts on the classified documents... is Trump guilty of a no-no?

Before you answer let me state that I believe that even if Trump SAID he WANTS something declassified it REMAINS CLASSIFIED until the declassification notice is put on the document. You could argue that the declassification occurs at the time of his statement, but there would have to be documented evidence that he said that at a particular point in time. This allows for a delay between his request and the processing of the document. But keep in mind that there are multiple copies of a document, so surely SOME of those copies would have been processed, right? If so then the agencies that hold those declassified documents should be coming to his defence... but nothing so far.

I think he is guilty, but I am not sure Garland will go through with the unprecedented step of charging Trump. As you know, I think he should be charged and his tailor should be sending the jailhouse his measurements for an orange suit.
Conspiracies aside, I am curious as to your though... (show quote)


I'm not like you and many other people on both sides, I believe in the presumption of innocence for everyone until proven guilty no matter whether in the right or left or center.

Reply
 
 
Sep 21, 2022 13:06:48   #
slocumeddie Loc: Inside your head, again
 
JohnFrim wrote:
Conspiracies aside, I am curious as to your thoughts on the classified documents... is Trump guilty of a no-no?

Before you answer let me state that I believe that even if Trump SAID he WANTS something declassified it REMAINS CLASSIFIED until the declassification notice is put on the document. You could argue that the declassification occurs at the time of his statement, but there would have to be documented evidence that he said that at a particular point in time. This allows for a delay between his request and the processing of the document. But keep in mind that there are multiple copies of a document, so surely SOME of those copies would have been processed, right? If so then the agencies that hold those declassified documents should be coming to his defence... but nothing so far.

I think he is guilty, but I am not sure Garland will go through with the unprecedented step of charging Trump. As you know, I think he should be charged and his tailor should be sending the jailhouse his measurements for an orange suit.
Conspiracies aside, I am curious as to your though... (show quote)

Thank goodness your fantasies and what you think is only relevant to you, Canuck.....!!!

Reply
Sep 21, 2022 13:21:38   #
JohnFrim Loc: Somewhere in the Great White North.
 
slocumeddie wrote:
Thank goodness your fantasies and what you think is only relevant to you, Canuck.....!!!


Yeah, Trump hopes that, too. But I suspect this one is going to bite him in the ass. I think it will be like impeachment... charge, found guilty, but given an undeserved pass.

But, I know, you could care less! Sad, really, that you admire such a piece of work.

Reply
Sep 22, 2022 13:08:25   #
Penny MG Loc: Fresno, Texas
 
JohnFrim wrote:
I thought you were in the medical field... yet you defend Trump over Fauci???

Your statement that "Trump figured out that Fauci wasn't exactly on top of things" is actually funny. Trump can't figure ANYTHING out, including that he lost the election and that his stealing of classified documents is an illegal act.


I will choose Trump over Fauci any day because I keep up with medical advances all over the world and I knew what Fauci was all about, and it wasn't the science.

Reply
Sep 22, 2022 14:50:21   #
anotherview Loc: California
 
Could you say more?: "I knew what Fauci was all about, and it wasn't the science."
Penny MG wrote:
I will choose Trump over Fauci any day because I keep up with medical advances all over the world and I knew what Fauci was all about, and it wasn't the science.

Reply
 
 
Sep 22, 2022 15:32:26   #
JohnFrim Loc: Somewhere in the Great White North.
 
Penny MG wrote:
I will choose Trump over Fauci any day because I keep up with medical advances all over the world and I knew what Fauci was all about, and it wasn't the science.


I might agree with you on Fauci not being about science when you agree that Trump was not about loyalty to the Constitution and not about love for America. To spell it out more clearly, Trump was/is about himself and no one or nothing else. Proving my take on Trump is easy; the burden of proof regarding Fauci is on you.

Reply
Sep 22, 2022 15:42:08   #
Racmanaz Loc: Sunny Tucson!
 
JohnFrim wrote:
I might agree with you on Fauci not being about science when you agree that Trump was not about loyalty to the Constitution and not about love for America. To spell it out more clearly, Trump was/is about himself and no one or nothing else. Proving my take on Trump is easy; the burden of proof regarding Fauci is on you.


Why do you Lefties always repeat the same BS lie that Trump was and is all about himself? Evidence suggest you are full of cr**ola.

Reply
Sep 22, 2022 16:10:14   #
JohnFrim Loc: Somewhere in the Great White North.
 
Racmanaz wrote:
Why do you Lefties always repeat the same BS lie that Trump was and is all about himself? Evidence suggest you are full of cr**ola.


Choke! Cough! Gasp!

Holy crap, Rac, are you serious?

Well, coming from you... I guess so. But keep on loving the guy and defending him; it's what Trumpettes do.

Reply
Sep 23, 2022 08:39:58   #
Penny MG Loc: Fresno, Texas
 
JohnFrim wrote:
I might agree with you on Fauci not being about science when you agree that Trump was not about loyalty to the Constitution and not about love for America. To spell it out more clearly, Trump was/is about himself and no one or nothing else. Proving my take on Trump is easy; the burden of proof regarding Fauci is on you.


If you go read all the medical documentation about Covid that came from Europe regarding therapeutics like Hydroxychloroquin and Ivermectin from the start of the pandemic, you might understand. Remember how the government blocked the use of these meds, especially Ivermectin? Well now if you look up the CDC and NIH's acceptable treatments for Covid IVERMECTIN is on that list. Funny how they didn't announce that to the general public. Places across the ocean that couldn't get Regeneron or Monoclonal antibodies or other treatments, especially in India, used Ivermectin with really good results. But, our government / Fauci wouldn't consider that information because they could pad big pharma's pockets. And, Fauci was enjoying the spotlight and didn't want to let that power go.

Reply
 
 
Sep 23, 2022 08:42:59   #
Penny MG Loc: Fresno, Texas
 
JohnFrim wrote:
Choke! Cough! Gasp!

Holy crap, Rac, are you serious?

Well, coming from you... I guess so. But keep on loving the guy and defending him; it's what Trumpettes do.


well John, at the time many of the Bidenettes are jumping ship. He's ruining this country and the dimwits on the left are supporting him. There has to be something seriously wrong with someone who supports a president that can't even find his way off of a stage.

Reply
Sep 23, 2022 09:42:05   #
JohnFrim Loc: Somewhere in the Great White North.
 
Penny MG wrote:
well John, at the time many of the Bidenettes are jumping ship. He's ruining this country and the dimwits on the left are supporting him. There has to be something seriously wrong with someone who supports a president that can't even find his way off of a stage.


I don't evaluate Biden on his performance as a stand-alone, but rather as a comparison to Trump... and he wins bigly in that comparison.

As for stand-alone presidential candidates, I am still waiting for a decent POTUS to emerge. Clinton, Trump, Biden, Sanders, and most of the runners over the past 6-year window have NOT been stellar. And the future for 2024 is also pretty bleak at the moment. Can Americans not find even just a few decent people out of 330 million???

Reply
Sep 23, 2022 13:39:22   #
slocumeddie Loc: Inside your head, again
 
JohnFrim wrote:
I don't evaluate Biden on his performance as a stand-alone, but rather as a comparison to Trump... and he wins bigly in that comparison.

As for stand-alone presidential candidates, I am still waiting for a decent POTUS to emerge. Clinton, Trump, Biden, Sanders, and most of the runners over the past 6-year window have NOT been stellar. And the future for 2024 is also pretty bleak at the moment. Can Americans not find even just a few decent people out of 330 million???

Speaking of finding decent leaders, Canada failed spectacularly with Trudy, 'eh.....!!!



Reply
Sep 23, 2022 13:46:16   #
slocumeddie Loc: Inside your head, again
 
JohnFrim wrote:
I might agree with you on Fauci not being about science when you agree that Trump was not about loyalty to the Constitution and not about love for America. To spell it out more clearly, Trump was/is about himself and no one or nothing else. Proving my take on Trump is easy; the burden of proof regarding Fauci is on you.

Your take on Trump is impossible to prove, since most of it is delusion, fantasy, or some other aberration.....

Reply
Page <<first <prev 10 of 15 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
The Attic
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.