Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
The Attic
"The Trump-appointed judge delivers the goods for her patron"
Page <<first <prev 4 of 13 next> last>>
Sep 20, 2022 15:48:20   #
Penny MG Loc: Fresno, Texas
 
jcboy3 wrote:
They agreed upon a 78-year old semi-retired judge to adjudicate 11,000 documents in less than 3 months?

I think the DOJ agreed just so they could clear that hurdle and appeal the whole mess of a decision.


appeal huh? well sure, that's all the left does.

Reply
Sep 20, 2022 15:49:40   #
Penny MG Loc: Fresno, Texas
 
Kmgw9v wrote:
Like Barr said—the Special Master is a red herring intended to slow things down—and it will. A commonly used tactic but Trump in many lawsuits.


It's used by lawyers all over the USA, not just Trump's lawyer. If that is what it takes to get to the TRUTH, so be it. Quit whining. its getting sickening.

Reply
Sep 20, 2022 15:50:37   #
Penny MG Loc: Fresno, Texas
 
Kmgw9v wrote:
I didn’t say that. Again, you run making assumptions tha fit your need. Barr is not someone I admire—not at all—-but that doesn’t mean he says the truth on occasion. When he is right, he is right, despite his history.


I guess YOU are the expert on WHEN Barr is correct? Huh? Sure..... ONLY when it fits your narrative.

Reply
 
 
Sep 20, 2022 15:51:11   #
Penny MG Loc: Fresno, Texas
 
Racmanaz wrote:
Lol oh so when he said things YOU like, then you kinda like him till he says something you don't like lol. You're such a lying hypocrite. Oh and the irony of you saying someone making assumptions to fit their needs. Of all people on here you are the one that makes the biggest assumptions.


AMEN Rac!

Reply
Sep 20, 2022 15:54:33   #
Penny MG Loc: Fresno, Texas
 
Kmgw9v wrote:
The FBI did not break any laws, But Trump did.


Wait, wait, wait...... Nothing has been established that Trump broke any laws....remember, its still being investigated. yeah, I know, its such a pesky thing have to say someone is INNOCENT until PROVEN guilty.

Reply
Sep 20, 2022 15:55:08   #
Penny MG Loc: Fresno, Texas
 
papakatz45 wrote:
The constitution assumes everyone is innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. So far, no trial, no evidence as accepted into a court of law. You armchair attorneys on the left give me a chuckle. You know nothing about the law.


Love your reply!

Reply
Sep 20, 2022 15:56:35   #
The Aardvark Is Ready
 
Kmgw9v wrote:
Fine, if your distinction is correct, nothing changes in Trump’s defense. What if I change the word “absconding” to “having”? Are you happy?


There is no "if" about my distinction. It is a fact. And no, changing the word absconding to having wouldn't work because of the sentence I pointed out. You said Trump "took" the documents after being warned by the lawyer not to take them. Just admit you lied and stop weaseling.

Reply
 
 
Sep 20, 2022 15:57:38   #
Penny MG Loc: Fresno, Texas
 
Kmgw9v wrote:
I think Yrump should be indicted and tried in a court of law, affored all due process according to the Constitution,
Like every other man or woman who is not above the law.
Revisit the Constitutional process of certifying a President after he is elected, and think about Trump’s attempts to circumvent the Constitution process by directing Pence to act illegally, and when that didn’t work, inciting his armed supporters to stop rhe Constitutional process by attacking the nation’s Capitol. Does Trump respect the Constitution? Read the Eastman memo.
I think Yrump should be indicted and tried in a co... (show quote)


He incited NO ONE. Only you crazies on the left would think the words "lets march peacefully and patriotically" would incite a riot.

Reply
Sep 20, 2022 16:00:42   #
Penny MG Loc: Fresno, Texas
 
BooIsMyCat wrote:
Five core truths about the Russia scandal.

Russia attacked the American elections in 2016

Every U.S. intelligence agency and lawmakers from both parties have long agreed that the Kremlin launched an expansive and expensive covert military intelligence operation that targeted the U.S. political system in 2016. This basic fact is no longer contested — except by Trump, who publicly declared that he found Vladimir Putin more reliable than his own administration’s officials — and its importance is too often overlooked.

Russia’s goal was to put Trump in power

The Kremlin’s operation was not politically neutral: Moscow attacked our elections in the hopes of helping dictate the outcome. According to the findings of U.S. intelligence agencies, the Mueller investigation, and the multi-step investigation from the GOP-led Senate Intelligence Committee, Russia saw Trump as a prospective ally and believed it would be in its interests if the Republican were in the White House.

Russia and Team Trump were political allies

As regular readers know, investigations from Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s team and the GOP-led Senate Intelligence Committee documented the extent to which Trump and his team welcomed, received, and benefited from Russian campaign assistance. (They also obstructed the investigation into this assistance — by some measures, 10 times.)
The evidence also showed there was coordination and high-level connections between Trump’s political operation and those responsible for the attack on our elections. The Senate Intelligence Committee’s report at one point literally described a “direct tie between senior Trump Campaign officials and the Russian intelligence services.”

Team Trump lied about its communications with Russia

No, really, Team Trump lied about its communications with Russia. A lot. Out loud and on record. Over and over again, Trump and his spokespersons insisted there were absolutely no interactions between the Republican, his political operation, and their Russian benefactors. We now know definitively that they were lying — though they still haven’t been forthcoming about why.

The Russia scandal led to a series of felony convictions and prison sentences

For an alleged “hoax,” the Russia scandal led to an amazing number of federal prosecutions. In fact, the investigation — the one Lowry derided as “a national fiasco” — led to the convictions of, among others, Trump’s White House national security advisor, campaign chairman, deputy campaign chairman, foreign policy advisor, personal lawyer, and 13 Russian nationals who interfered in our elections as part of the larger plot.

But these five aforementioned truths are largely uncontested, and have been bolstered, not only by U.S. intelligence agencies, but also by the Mueller probe and the GOP-led Senate Intelligence Committee’s findings. Russia attacked our elections to help Trump. The Republican’s political operation welcomed, received, benefited from, and lied about Russian campaign assistance. Many key players from Trump’s inner circle were charged, prosecuted, and convicted.

These aren’t opinions. They’re conclusions drawn from multiple, “bipartisan investigations, conducted across several years.”

The only “hoax” here is the one being perpetrated by those pretending the Russia scandal wasn’t real.
Five core truths about the Russia scandal. br br ... (show quote)


"Russia's goal was to put Trump in power" - THAT IS THE BIGGEST LAUGH ever. I'm sure Russia would rather have Fat Hillary in office. After all, Hillary did take donations from the Russians so she was somewhat partial to them.

Reply
Sep 20, 2022 16:02:20   #
Penny MG Loc: Fresno, Texas
 
dlwhawaii wrote:
No we can not agree to your little but important point "Every President has the power to full SCOTUS slots when they become available." Case in point Moscow Mitch delaying Obama's selection of a SCOTUS appointee for over a year, until Obama was out of office. https://www.npr.org/2016/03/16/470664561/mcconnell-blocking-supreme-court-nomination-about-a-principle-not-a-person
Don't give me your repuke BS. For your own sanity, keep drinking the Kool Aid.


Hey, if the left is going to keep putting in lame brain people that can't even tell us what a woman is, then it is better the left NOT appoint any more idiots.

Reply
Sep 20, 2022 16:05:07   #
Penny MG Loc: Fresno, Texas
 
Kmgw9v wrote:
I have read Judge Cannon’s rational for making Trump “special; and I have read many other legal opinions who all say she is blatantly wrong. The Special Master might be a terrible mistake for Trump. Dearie has requested that Trump testify under oath that he de-classified documents. If he said he did, that will fly in the face of all the Trump insiders that knew of no outstanding directive. If he said he did not de-classify the documents, that will expose him as a liar to the public, and put him in an even deeper legal hole. Further, one of his top attorneys, Eric Hershmann, has testified that he warned Trump about absconding with the documents. Trump ignored the advice, and as we all know, he did it anyway. That will go to show intent and obstruction.
Poor little Trump- he is his own worst enemy.
I have read Judge Cannon’s rational for making Tru... (show quote)


Surely you remember that Trump has many attorneys. Though one may have said one thing, the other may have said something else. You seem to hang on to any thread, even coming from Trump's camp, IF they say one thing that fits your narrative. It's getting quite pathetic.

Reply
 
 
Sep 20, 2022 16:09:34   #
Kmgw9v Loc: Miami, Florida
 
The Aardvark Is Ready wrote:
There is no "if" about my distinction. It is a fact. And no, changing the word absconding to having wouldn't work because of the sentence I pointed out. You said Trump "took" the documents after being warned by the lawyer not to take them. Just admit you lied and stop weaseling.


A lie has to include intent to deceive. Sloppy wording—maybe. Lying-No. Get over it.

Reply
Sep 20, 2022 16:13:08   #
The Aardvark Is Ready
 
Penny MG wrote:
Surely you remember that Trump has many attorneys. Though one may have said one thing, the other may have said something else. You seem to hang on to any thread, even coming from Trump's camp, IF they say one thing that fits your narrative. It's getting quite pathetic.


They do always pick the one that suits their narrative, don't they? Lots of people have more than one attorney and they often give conflicting advice. If Trump chooses one's opinion over the other, it's proof to the libs Trump knew what he was doing was illegal. SMH

Reply
Sep 20, 2022 16:17:28   #
The Aardvark Is Ready
 
Kmgw9v wrote:
A lie has to include intent to deceive. Sloppy wording—maybe. Lying-No. Get over it.


Ok weasel. It wasn't sloppy wording. It was a lie. Again the sentence I pointed out destroys your "sloppy wording" defense. Your intent was to deceive because of your TDS. I don't have anything to get over. You're the one who has to live with themself. Are you proud of being a liar?

Reply
Sep 20, 2022 16:47:24   #
Racmanaz Loc: Sunny Tucson!
 
Penny MG wrote:
More whining for the left. There are many more leftist judges causing the American people grief by not upholding the law and giving adequate bonds to keep the harden criminals in jail. Why don't you whine about that for a while. Those judges are literally playing with people's life.


He is blatantly obsessed with Trump to the point that it occupies his mind throughout the day and he cannot contemplate anything else, there is no room in that little brain. This is just one example of many that exhibits a severe case of TDS.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 4 of 13 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
The Attic
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.