travel and hiking camera (Page 4): Since no one else will suggest it, I will. Take a newer smartphone with you like an IPhone 13 pro max. They are excellent at landscapes and...

Strodav Loc: Houston, Tx

Since no one else will suggest it, I will. Take a newer smartphone with you like an IPhone 13 pro max. They are excellent at landscapes and portraits. The 13 isn’t too bad at macro photography and pretty good at low light photography. If you want a higher resolution landscape shot, take overlapping images and stitch together in post. You are probably going to take it with you anyway. Personally, I take a D7200 with Tamron 18-400mm with me as I like to have telephoto capability. It’s light, compact and is a step above in IQ, but it is not as light and compact as my smartphone.

SalvageDiver Loc: Huntington Beach CA

srom wrote:

I returned from a trip to the USA and Canada. We went hiking in the mountains. I had a Nikon d7500 camera. I felt that I should carry a lighter camera. I read about travel cameras on the internet. I would be happy to know from the experience of the people, what camera would you take for trips and in particular for hiking in the mountains??

We hike in the mountains regularly. I carry a Sony a6000 with the 24-70mm kit lens. I chose this model because its small and light and if I dropped it over a cliff or down the side of the mountain, I'd be more disappointed loosing the memory card than the camera. I've been carrying this camera for about 5 years and see no need to change.

bobforman Loc: Anacortes, Washington State

I carry my Nikon Df with a 24-85 lens attached to a chest harness when hiking with my rather vigorous group. The harness frees up both hands for hiking poles. The camera's light, full-frame, and versatile. If we are doing trails where birds are likely, I'll use a heavier, longer lens.

wdross Loc: Castle Rock, Colorado

srom wrote:

I returned from a trip to the USA and Canada. We went hiking in the mountains. I had a Nikon d7500 camera. I felt that I should carry a lighter camera. I read about travel cameras on the internet. I would be happy to know from the experience of the people, what camera would you take for trips and in particular for hiking in the mountains??

Agree with Hip Coyote. For a simple camera that can shoot JPEGs and RAW, it is a winner. Also get both the diffuser and ring flash attachment. And it can be remotely controlled by a smartphone.

SuperflyTNT Loc: Manassas VA

CHG_CANON wrote:

Why are you back?

And why isn’t he using his perfect Foveon sensor?

frankraney Loc: Clovis, Ca.

srom wrote:

I returned from a trip to the USA and Canada. We went hiking in the mountains. I had a Nikon d7500 camera. I felt that I should carry a lighter camera. I read about travel cameras on the internet. I would be happy to know from the experience of the people, what camera would you take for trips and in particular for hiking in the mountains??

I never take a small / lighter camera. I take my D7200 with an 18-140mm attached. everywhere, even on hikes. I do one of a few things, depending on the hike and how hard it is. I sometimes wear a vest with the camera attached. This frees my hands for trekking poles. I also have a backpack with snacks and water, with a tripod strapped to it.

Sometimes I wear a holster on my belt, with a backpack etc.

Sometimes I use a sling, and let the camera hang to the side on an easy hike.

Sometimes I carry a second camera with a 35mm 1.8 prime attached. Both cameras are on a sling, one on each side.

I did try a bridge camera for a short time, a very short time, and just missed my 7200 too much.

So, if you love your camera take it. If it seems to heavy for you, there are ways to lighten the load.

If you really want a bridge camera, there are several that are good. I used a coolpix. Here is a link to several.

https://www.bestproductsreviews.com/nikon-coolpix-p900-bridge-camera?targetid=dat-2336805806904725:loc-190&matchtype=b&device=c&campaignid=436284975&creative=&adgroupid=1360097650281211&feeditemid=&loc_physical_ms=44303&loc_interest_ms=&network=o&devicemodel=&placement=&keyword=$ALL&target=&aceid={aceid}&adposition=&trackid=uk_all_top_11_1&mId=407-132-4411&trackOld=true&msclkid=beecb775eb981b851aafd456b673408c

SuperflyTNT Loc: Manassas VA

I just got back from hiking in the Scottish highlands and I carried my Olympus OM-1. I meant to take the 14-150mm lens but forgot to pack it, but the 12-40mm Pro lens was really all I needed most of the time. The only time I yearned for more focal length was when there was a hawk flying nearby. I had the 40-150mm Pro with the 2x TC in my backpack but no time to change lenses on that tricky trail. And no need to go as expensive as the OM-1. Something like an E-M5 with the 14-150 would be great.

mffox Loc: Avon, CT

Olympus Pen-F.

BrianFlaherty Loc: Wilseyville, CA

insman1132 wrote:

You may find it easier to function while hiking with a Bridge Camera. Nikon P950 would be a good choice with the great reach of its lens. I have a P900 (earlier version of the 950) and it is what I take when out in the wilds.

I am considering downsizing ALL my entire collection of equipment in favor of a single camera. It will be the first equipment purchase I will have made in almost 20 years. . .And, based upon YOUR comment re: the P900, I will buy one (after I get rid of all my OTHER gear!). Question: Do you have any "issues" with the P900 that I should consider before making this Great Leap? <smile>. If you like you can PM me. . Any comment would be appreciated <smile>. [I am unloading a D7100; a D7000; a D90; an F3 and F100 and, assorted lenses that served me well in over 30 years of forensic investigations, preparing photo exhibits for courtroom "exhibition;" and, of course, family photo shoots! And, the P900 appears to be the perfect replacement in the more sedentary life I now lead. . .And, it won't break the bank!]

RightOnPhotography Loc: Quebec,QC

srom wrote:

I returned from a trip to the USA and Canada. We went hiking in the mountains. I had a Nikon d7500 camera. I felt that I should carry a lighter camera. I read about travel cameras on the internet. I would be happy to know from the experience of the people, what camera would you take for trips and in particular for hiking in the mountains??

Since you already own a Nikon camera, I presume you have Nikon lenses. In this case, the cheapest and most logical step for you is purchasing Nikon Z50 and FTZ adapter which will allow you to use all your lenses. Z50 is very small and light, almost the half weight of D7500, they are both ASP-C cameras, same resolution, but Z50 have quite a few advantages over D7500.
View the comparison here: https://cameradecision.com/compare/Nikon-D7500-vs-Nikon-Z50

markwilliam1

Rick from NY wrote:

Agree with RX100m7, but the Rx10iv? He may as well carry his Nikon.

Have you ever used or carried a RX10M4? Probably Not as it’s very compact! Overall width is Only 6 1/4”. The lens extends only when you turn on the camera. The Nikon is very large by comparison and the image quality is Terrible compared to the RX10M4!

markwilliam1

MDI Mainer wrote:

Also the Sony DSC-HX99, which has a 24-720 mm Zoom (full frame equivalent) by Zeiss (1440 mm with Clear Image Zoom), and is far less costly than either of the RX models.

Also Agree! I own this camera but the image quality doesn’t come close to My RX100vii but the reach of the HX99 is Incredible an I can clean up images with Topaz. billnikon also recommends this as a travel camera and he has Awesome pictures using it plus he’s a Professional Photographer.

dick ranez

the new phones are pretty good. I downsized my travel gear to a Panasonic FZ1000 - great zoom range (seldom need the extreme range) decent sensor and software and light! A small bag for charger, battery and extra card that can pack in my carryon and I'm set.

Al Beatty Loc: Boise, Idaho

I'm a Nikon guy but I have to recommend any of the Sony RX100 series. I recently bought 2 M3s for my Zoom studio and like them a lot. I took one on several walks and the pictures it produces are stunning. I'm not dropping my Nikons but one of these is now my grab-and-go camera. Take care & ...

joecichjr Loc: Chicago S. Suburbs, Illinois, USA

bobforman wrote:

I carry my Nikon Df with a 24-85 lens attached to a chest harness when hiking with my rather vigorous group. The harness frees up both hands for hiking poles. The camera's light, full-frame, and versatile. If we are doing trails where birds are likely, I'll use a heavier, longer lens.

Great shot, but my vertigo just kicked in 💜💛💜💛💜