Check out Traditional Street and Architectural Photography section of our forum.
3D - Glamour.
Sep 5, 2022 11:26:10 #
alexol wrote:
This sounds (unnecessarily) disapproving and prudish to me, which leads me to ask why, since you apparently feel strongly on the topic, are you even opening a post which is certain to contain scantily clad (and hopefully well photographed) female forms?
How in the HELL did you reach that conclusion, I was neither slamming the post, nor disapproving it, in fact I rather liked it. Why do people get their panties in a bunch when they don't understand wording, calm down, Skippy.
Sep 5, 2022 11:44:50 #
Sep 5, 2022 12:29:15 #
Check out Sports Photography section of our forum.
Sep 5, 2022 12:48:21 #
Two things:
1. Took a class given by a professional Nude and Glamor photographer. Nude is self-explanatory. Glamor is when the model is covered by anything, i.e.: not nude.
2. 3D - I have double vision and macular degeneration - glasses do me no good. Ber nice if you could post both ways.
1. Took a class given by a professional Nude and Glamor photographer. Nude is self-explanatory. Glamor is when the model is covered by anything, i.e.: not nude.
2. 3D - I have double vision and macular degeneration - glasses do me no good. Ber nice if you could post both ways.
Sep 5, 2022 13:12:14 #
Talking just photography processing, compared to many 3D pics posted, this 3D conversion is a fine one.
Sep 5, 2022 14:38:41 #
jeep_daddy wrote:
I don't have the glasses needed to see her. Perhaps you can post both ways so that those of us that don't have glasses can at least see....
***
If you have followed my 3D posts of over 700 you will find that I do not normally post the 2D. They are deleted as they are no longer needed. I need to keep my hard drive free for the 3Ds.
I will post a 3D tomorrow and will post the 2D with it. Tomorrow will be an exception to my rule.
Sep 5, 2022 14:41:05 #
Check out Drone Video and Photography Forum section of our forum.
Sep 5, 2022 14:58:28 #
alexol wrote:
How about perhaps always posting both and THEN deleting the 2D?
***
Sorry, that is not going to happen.
Sep 5, 2022 15:00:55 #
DAN Phillips wrote:
It would look much better in normal view instead of idiotic 3D!
***
You may go to Pexels.com or Pixabay and see all the 3Ds in 2D. This is the site from which they are downloaded.
Sep 5, 2022 15:02:07 #
insman1132 wrote:
Talking just photography processing, compared to many 3D pics posted, this 3D conversion is a fine one.
***
Thank you for the comment.
Sep 5, 2022 15:04:39 #
SoHillGuy wrote:
***
If you have followed my 3D posts of over 700 you will find that I do not normally post the 2D. They are deleted as they are no longer needed. I need to keep my hard drive free for the 3Ds.
I will post a 3D tomorrow and will post the 2D with it. Tomorrow will be an exception to my rule.
If you have followed my 3D posts of over 700 you will find that I do not normally post the 2D. They are deleted as they are no longer needed. I need to keep my hard drive free for the 3Ds.
I will post a 3D tomorrow and will post the 2D with it. Tomorrow will be an exception to my rule.
Update: I have decided in view of some of the comments not to post anymore on this site whcih includes tomorrow.
Check out Photo Critique Section section of our forum.
Sep 6, 2022 10:07:36 #
DAN Phillips wrote:
WHY 3D?
Because 3D is reality. 2D photography is just an abstraction of reality. But you must like abstract art exclusively that is without depth, and laying flat on canvas or paper.
Sep 6, 2022 10:37:22 #
Sep 6, 2022 12:33:05 #
Sep 6, 2022 17:16:56 #
Earnest Botello wrote:
She looks great to me, Gaylord, but that is not glamour, it's called soft porn.
Wow. Really? I would like to know what exactly is pornographic about it. She could be wearing the swimsuit she wears to the beach for all we know.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out Bridge Camera Show Case section of our forum.