Indi wrote:
A friend of mine just asked me a question about iPhone photography.
“Back to photography, I’m curious what your group is saying about the iPhone camera.”
She’s a very astute amateur photographer and I think she’s using an iPhone 13.
Personally, I have trouble using my iPhone XS Max, especially when there is insufficient light. Obviously, my first choice is my Nikon D5300.
Any thoughts/suggestions?
The best camera you have is the one you have with you when you want or need one!
Don't think for a minute you can't make great images with a smartphone. Most of what you need quite often is in your HEAD, not your HANDS.
That said, there are many things no smartphone can do well (yet). So there is, "room in the box for more than one tool."
For AT LEAST 80% of what the average Jane and Joe, Oingo and Boingo need 80% of the time, the iPhone 13 is a dynamite solution. I'd even say that's a very conservative statement. It's probably over 90% and 90%. Most people with a high end smartphone:
A) Have it near them nearly all day, every day.
B) Use it in place of the point-and-shoot cameras they used to use for MOST of their daily imaging needs.
For those who do what I call INTENTIONAL photography, where every aspect of scene and event capture are considered (pre-meditated, if you will), an adjustable camera with interchangeable lenses is an important tool. It gives you the direct, MANUAL controls you need, when you need them. It gives you the potential to use extreme optics, such as real zooms, super telephotos, wide angles, macro lenses, etc. It gives you a choice of formats from Micro 4/3, to APS-C, to full frame, to medium format. It gives you film options if you use a film camera.
So if that pre-meditative part of photography presents a challenge to a photographer with a smartphone, it presents less of one to a photographer with a smartphone AND an interchangeable lens camera system of some sort.
Especially where telephoto reach is needed (beyond 2X normal lens focal length), actual long lenses are practically required. Smartphones don't have real telephoto optics built into them. (You can bolt them on, but that's just cumbersome, weird, and doesn't work very well.) You really do need a 16X OPTICAL zoom if you are photographing birds and wildlife at a distance, for a calendar. Cropping a 12 megapixel smartphone image digitally to get that 16X normal result is not going to cut it. I wouldn't waste time trying.
I borrowed a 100 to 400mm Leica zoom for my Lumix GH4 once. It has a 4X normal to 16X normal zoom range (equivalent to 200 to 800mm on a full frame camera). It was perfect for the event (bird feeder video and still photography). My iPhone stayed in my camera bag.
The iPhone 14 will be announced on September 7, at 1:00 PM Eastern Daylight Time, US. The faithful fone freaks and the tech rumor mill are already drooling. This year, I'm joining them, since my iPhone 7 Plus with dying battery won't be supported on the upcoming iOS 16.
One more thing... There really isn't a 'versus' here. If you buy a smartphone, there are at least two million reasons to do so. They're called apps, or software applications. The camera is also a reason to buy it, but the iPhone isn't just a camera. It's an Internet-connected supercomputer in your pocket or purse. I use my phone for at least 100 other things besides photography and video. My serious camera just records stills and video. But I only use it for INTENTIONAL photography...