Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
OM-1 Question...
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
Apr 18, 2022 08:26:37   #
MrBob Loc: lookout Mtn. NE Alabama
 
Dave Sr wrote:
I replaced my D800 with the OM-1, then upgraded to the MkII and MkIII over the years, and the OM-1 a couple weeks ago. The OM-1 menu is more user friendly, modes as stacking and Hi-res compute much faster, and 'subject detection' auto-focus is just amazing (bird detection even works for airplanes :-) I haven't noticed a great difference in noise at high ISO but haven't looked very carefully either.


Thanks for your input dave, comments from folks here are really appreciated. I realize this is NOT an Olympus biased site, but I figured there should be some users.

Reply
Apr 18, 2022 08:35:14   #
whitehall Loc: Canada
 
Thanks. I really enjoy the EM 5. The IQ is first rat. However, my current thinking is that since I have a very good general purpose Camera ( the R5), and the limited purpose for which I use the Olympus system ( travel) the OM 1 is not warranted for me. But, having read and seen the reviews if I started I would likely purchase the OM 1.

Reply
Apr 18, 2022 10:01:29   #
moonhawk Loc: Land of Enchantment
 
ricardo00 wrote:
Just curious, which computational modes are you interested in? You are more likely to get people who are experienced with these modes by posting in forums specifically focussed on the micro 4/3 system, for example on DP Review or on Fred Miranda:

https://www.dpreview.com/forums/1041
https://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/board/61


I highly recommend mu43: https://www.mu-43.com

Very friendly and helpful for all things micro 4/3

Reply
 
 
Apr 18, 2022 10:22:45   #
wdross Loc: Castle Rock, Colorado
 
Jerrin1 wrote:
I had better outline my camera history in order to provide you with a balanced view. I purchased the original OM1 back in 1975 and since then have owned 10 Olympus cameras. I currently own 2 OMD - S/Olympus OM1 bodies plus a 300mm f4 + MC14, MC20, 40 - 150mm f4, 60mm f2.8 macro and 14 - 150mm II. I shoot wildlife almost exclusively, and have to say that from my perspective, the OM1 is the best wildlife camera on the market at this time. I must reiterate, that this is my personal view. For perspective, I part exchanged my Olympus EM1X and EM1 mark III for my two OM1 bodies. Prior to that, I owned a Sony A9 and Sony A7R4. The OM1 AF speed and accuracy are truly brilliant: and CAF + TR + bird recognition is simply amazing. The 5.7 million dot OLED EVF is excellent and the new LCD back panel a vast improvement over the old one. Though 50 fps sounds a bit of a gimmick (and I did not bother to use such a high frame rate for a couple of weeks), I find it to be fantastic for birds in flight. I have not moved off SH2 (50 fps) for BIF, as it enables me to choose the best wing beat captures. Low light performance is really good and the images appear to be sharper, thanks to the new sensor (though that is subjective, I suppose). Pro Capture is just marvellous, as are in camera focus stacking and focus bracketting. The updated in camera ND filter also looks very good. I reckon that if you purchase an EM5, you will end up kicking yourself for not choosing an OM1. But, the OM1 is not for everyone. I purchased two of them because I believe OMD-S has targetted wildlife and, to a slightly lesser degree, sports photographers with this camera. It therefore suits me perfectly. But I suggest that you consider your genres of photography prior to making a final decision. I wish you good luck regardless which camera you choose.
I had better outline my camera history in order to... (show quote)


The suggestion of considering genres of the OPs photography is probably the best deciding factor. The OM-1 is really designed for taking action pictures as well as others. Strong landscape use, where one's wants / needs the 50mp JPEG / 80mp RAW handheld images, is one of the other decision makers.

Reply
Apr 18, 2022 10:33:33   #
moonhawk Loc: Land of Enchantment
 
Jerrin1 wrote:
I had better outline my camera history in order to provide you with a balanced view. I purchased the original OM1 back in 1975 and since then have owned 10 Olympus cameras. I currently own 2 OMD - S/Olympus OM1 bodies plus a 300mm f4 + MC14, MC20, 40 - 150mm f4, 60mm f2.8 macro and 14 - 150mm II. I shoot wildlife almost exclusively, and have to say that from my perspective, the OM1 is the best wildlife camera on the market at this time. I must reiterate, that this is my personal view. For perspective, I part exchanged my Olympus EM1X and EM1 mark III for my two OM1 bodies. Prior to that, I owned a Sony A9 and Sony A7R4. The OM1 AF speed and accuracy are truly brilliant: and CAF + TR + bird recognition is simply amazing. The 5.7 million dot OLED EVF is excellent and the new LCD back panel a vast improvement over the old one. Though 50 fps sounds a bit of a gimmick (and I did not bother to use such a high frame rate for a couple of weeks), I find it to be fantastic for birds in flight. I have not moved off SH2 (50 fps) for BIF, as it enables me to choose the best wing beat captures. Low light performance is really good and the images appear to be sharper, thanks to the new sensor (though that is subjective, I suppose). Pro Capture is just marvellous, as are in camera focus stacking and focus bracketting. The updated in camera ND filter also looks very good. I reckon that if you purchase an EM5, you will end up kicking yourself for not choosing an OM1. But, the OM1 is not for everyone. I purchased two of them because I believe OMD-S has targetted wildlife and, to a slightly lesser degree, sports photographers with this camera. It therefore suits me perfectly. But I suggest that you consider your genres of photography prior to making a final decision. I wish you good luck regardless which camera you choose.
I had better outline my camera history in order to... (show quote)


Thanks for that review Jerrin. I currntly have the EM1.3 and EM1X. My OM1 arrives one week from today. Wish I had ordered right off the bat, as I usually do. Your post makes me even more eager to get mine. Question to you is, do you miss the vertical grip on the X, or do you have the battery grip? I don't see that available yet, but I'm on the waiting list at B&H. I have a rotator cuff issue that's making the overhand grip on vertical shots difficult, so for that I appreciate the grip on the X.

Like you I will probably sell both the X and the 3, and buy two OM-1s. I dislike having two different sets of controls and menus. I wish Olympus made all their control and menu layouts the same.

Reply
Apr 18, 2022 10:40:10   #
moonhawk Loc: Land of Enchantment
 
To the troglodytes: it used to be true to some extent that new cameras didn't take any better pictures than old ones, unless you're comparing brownies to 8x10s, for instance. But advances like motor drives, and better lenses did and still do make a difference with genres like sports and wildlife. What else made a difference was new and better films. I was blown away when Fujichrome Velvia 50 came out, and shot nothing else until I went digital.

Digital, though, is still relatively new. New sensor tech is today's new film. With mirrorless, improved viewfinders help old eyes like mine see better, and AI advances such as bird recognition help tremendously.

Yes, of course, it's still the stuff between the ears that makes you a "photographer", but photography has always been a technology-dependent art form, and always will be. Which is why Ansel preferred view cameras to Instamatics.

Reply
Apr 18, 2022 11:27:50   #
NotAnselAdams Loc: Pueblo, CO
 
I have carried an Oly for many years. Currently I have two; an EM-1 Mark III and a EM-10 Mark III. I primarily shoot the EM-1 as its performance is superb. The use of either PRO or prime glass compliments the EM-1 quite well. The EM-10 is my "hip shoot" camera. Not that expensive, compared to other cameras, coupled with a 14-42 3.5-5.6 Zuiko that collapses down to 1 inch makes for a great pocket camera. With the "10" I leave it in program mode and have found it usually shoots bang on. If I've the time I easily make adjustment to aperture or ISO.
Both are excellent cameras and I would recommend them.
Not Ansel

Reply
 
 
Apr 18, 2022 11:34:51   #
wdross Loc: Castle Rock, Colorado
 
MrBob wrote:
You are NOT butting in.. I am really interested in what you think of the EM-5. It was on my short list before considering the OM... Might be at top of list after reconsidering finances.


Finances are always a consideration. This is why it will be about three years before I will get an OM-1. The E-M1 mkIII is too new for selling off as a loss in my and my wife's eyes (sell my E-M1 mkII before doing that). But if your wants / needs are not that advanced, the EM-5 is still a good camera. But if you have any intentions in wildlife, action photos, or landscapes, you might be better off getting the OM-1 over the E-M5. Quite a bit of money more. But in this case, probably worth it.

Reply
Apr 18, 2022 11:35:15   #
rcarol
 
whitehall wrote:
I recently purchased an EM 5 mk iii and am wondering if I should upgrade to the OM 1 for travel photography. For other types of photography I own a Canon R 5, but for travel, weight is an issue, so I am interested in this exchange. Sorry to but in.


Personally, I feel that any of the Olympus cameras that offer "Scene" modes make for a better travel camera than the OMD EM1 MK III. I use the Hand Held Starlight mode for making low light images. Since I do not use a tripod when I travel, I find this feature to be indespensible. I have attached an image to illustrate my point.


(Download)

Reply
Apr 18, 2022 11:41:05   #
NotAnselAdams Loc: Pueblo, CO
 
Where was the shot taken?
Not Ansel

Reply
Apr 18, 2022 11:45:18   #
rcarol
 
NotAnselAdams wrote:
Where was the shot taken?
Not Ansel


Norway during the winter season. I can provide more specific details if you're interested.

Reply
 
 
Apr 18, 2022 12:00:05   #
Dave Sr Loc: Nazareth, Pennsylvania
 
Now here's a new model of the OM-1, the V. You'll enjoy this short four minute video. And, keep in mind that the video was first published in EARLY APRIL :-)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KcLZd-vYNQk

Reply
Apr 18, 2022 12:22:48   #
burkphoto Loc: High Point, NC
 
billnikon wrote:
Your images will be no better with the OM-1. Your decision will be your own. If you read reviews like you said you did then those folks are also ACTUAL users.
Again, your images will not improve with any new camera, it is only a pipe dream.
Your decision has already been made, but better images are not in the offing, your just now looking for justification.
Personally I think you should buy the OM-1.
This post is not meat to be negative, just honest.


Said a little differently, "It's not what you have, but how you use it."

What the OM-1 or any new camera will do — compared to a five-year-old body — is to give you better ease of use, more tools, a nicer operating experience, and perhaps the ability to work in lower light or more challenging circumstances while still recording acceptable technical image quality.

What it can't do is make better compositions, tell better stories, give you a better perspective on what to capture... But if it makes you feel better when using it, that just might be the inspiration you need for making better photographs.

Reply
Apr 18, 2022 12:25:49   #
NotAnselAdams Loc: Pueblo, CO
 
Been to Bodo. Beautiful county. Thanks for the response.
Not Ansel

Reply
Apr 18, 2022 12:29:24   #
burkphoto Loc: High Point, NC
 
Dave Sr wrote:
Now here's a new model of the OM-1, the V. You'll enjoy this short four minute video. And, keep in mind that the video was first published in EARLY APRIL :-)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KcLZd-vYNQk


Hugh Brownstone did a similar piece:

"Why I'm Switching Back: Canon Announces Shocking EOS RS4, Turns The Industry Upside Down!"

https://youtu.be/kFNLi4Ulxyg

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.