idaholover Loc: Nampa ID

https://www.theepochtimes.com/doj-election-threat-taskforce-appears-to-have-something-to-hide-watchdog-group-president_4386808.html?utm_source=News&utm_campaign=breaking-2022-04-10-2&utm_medium=email&est=S7v9lxP4fha3TSPkoCVAZnZUOfDVxKTXa1ePwtc7Byl7fafcbTpsw8ivTyx61unwYP4%3D


DOJ Election Threat Taskforce Appears to Have ‘Something to Hide’: Watchdog Group President
By Masooma Haq and Roman Balmakov April 9, 2022 Updated: April 9, 2022 biggersmaller Print
Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton said the U.S. Justice Department (DOJ) is being weaponized against opposing voices. Fitton’s group filed a lawsuit against the DOJ recently to get documents connected to the department’s election threat task force, after almost a year of no response to their Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request. Fitton thinks the DOJ has something they don’t want the public to know.

“We want answers about it. And of course, when you don’t give us answers, and you don’t comply with the law that requires that records be turned over, it suggests to me that you got something to hide,” Fitton told the host of EpochTV’s “Facts Matter,” Roman Balmakov, during a recent interview. “So, what are they nervous about, that they don’t want to give to us?”

Related Coverage
DOJ Election Threat Taskforce Appears to Have ‘Something to Hide’: Watchdog Group PresidentFacts Matter (April 4): Election Watchdog Finds 137,500 Ballots Unlawfully Trafficked in Wisconsin, 4.8M Nationwide At Least
Fitton’s comments come after the DOJ’s July action to form an election threats task force to investigate alleged widespread threats to election officials.

“You know, I think we had asked for this material last year initially, and we still don’t have anything,” he said. Judicial Watch filed the lawsuit at the end of March for a FOIA request they submitted in August 2021 for all records related to the August virtual task force meeting.

According to Judicial Watch, the group is “a conservative, non-partisan educational foundation, which promotes transparency, accountability, and integrity in government, politics, and the law.”

According to the DOJ, “the task force is leading the Justice Department’s efforts to address threats of violence against election workers, and to ensure that all election workers—whether they be elected, appointed, or those who volunteer—be permitted to do their jobs free from threats and intimidation.” The task force will partner with U.S. Attorneys’ Offices and the FBI field offices to assess allegations of threats against election workers.

The DOJ has charged two people in connection with election threats since the launch of the task force.

“So not only do you have the DOJ involved, you get the FBI, you’ve got I think their national security operation involved as well, and the Department of Homeland Security. And you know, I read it as, ‘Don’t you dare ask questions about the way elections are being conducted, otherwise, you’ll be on our government radar.’”

Fitton believes that these efforts by the DOJ violate the public’s constitutional rights and target political opposition, and work more to intimidate people.

“So, what they do is they pretend that their political opponents are to be treated as national security threats, potential terrorists, lawbreakers, and then follow up with an intimidation effort that suggests law enforcement will be watching you if you talk on these specific topics.”

The DOJ declined to comment on the lawsuit and why they had not released the documents to Judicial Watch.

Broader Problem of Corruption

“Well, … frankly, most federal agencies are irredeemably corrupt, and they need to be really reformed in dramatic ways, if not dismantled, depending on the agency entirely,” said Fitton.

When it comes to bad public policy and misconduct, the Justice Department is at the center of the storm, he said.

“They defend the indefensible,” said Fitton. “So, everything you don’t like, if the federal government’s breaking the law, and you think that’s going on and there’s abuse, usually, there’s a Justice Department attorney or agency that’s more than willing to defend that and is pushing it or protecting them from accountability by pretending that records about government misconduct are secret and can’t be turned over.”

Fitton said the DOJ is too big and has too much money. “You’ve got this basic waste, fraud, and abuse issue, in addition to the politicization because no one’s watching the store. We need the watch the watchers.”

FrumCA

I didn’t say that at all. You should consider stopping your typical false assumptions narrative.

thom w Loc: San Jose, CA

From your earlier post:
"The once preeminent law enforcement and domestic intelligence agency that was the gold standard in professionalism and impartiality when it came to investigative endeavors has become the secret police for the Democratic Party."

If it was OK until Biden, it must have been OK under Hoover, who ran it for 50+ years. If it wasn't OK under Hoover, when did it become OK? I hate assuming but you tend to write in code, and I don't have a secret ring.

letmedance Loc: Walnut, Ca.

Have you checked your box of keepsakes,I am sure you grew up in the Ralston Chex secret decoder ring era.

FrumCA

I didn't say that either!! From my earlier post, it started under Obama. There's nothing that is unclear about that statement unless you continue to play dumb. Biden has done nothing to clean it [the FBI] up.

thom w Loc: San Jose, CA

Hell, I can't even find the car key I dropped in the bedroom yesterday.

Really I have no recollection of who gave out secret decoder rings, I just remember that they were a thing.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aFbfnDYqmQc

thom w Loc: San Jose, CA

So, it was good under Hoover or it wasn't. If it was bad under Hoover, when did it get good so it could go bad again.

FrumCA

You are not doing anything to dig yourself out of this hole. See above.

scooter1 Loc: Yacolt, Wa.