Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
? about Nikon D200
Page <prev 2 of 2
Mar 9, 2022 11:45:14   #
larryepage Loc: North Texas area
 
CHG_CANON wrote:
Which is risky? Paying more than it's worth to fix a broken camera? Or, going to a known reseller for a used camera that can be returned for no questions asked in a 2-week period? Or, realizing a 16-year old digital relic is a paperweight, exhausted of economic value, even if sentimental value remains?

The risk is probably highest / most likely for spending some money to find a digital relic can't be fixed for any amount.


The thing is that in a case like this it's about a lot more than the money, especially when we already have the newer cameras.

Reply
Mar 9, 2022 11:55:40   #
burkphoto Loc: High Point, NC
 
DAN Phillips wrote:
It's like the shutter is sticking, Nikon can't help me. I know it's old, but it has always been a goodie! Any suggestions?


As a rational project manager, I'd consider the D200 to have far-outlived its usefulness after a long life of service. I'd give it a proper sale as a parts camera and spend that money elsewhere. Maybe it's worth a good bottle of wine or a dinner out with your wife or friend.

Cameras are SUNK COST items. They depreciate instantly upon purchase. That's why refurbs and used gear are usually better deals than new ones (along with the phenomenon known as the Bathtub Curve). So the fact that until recently you were using a *digital* camera first released in 2005 tells me you got ALL your use from it!

Reply
Mar 9, 2022 17:16:52   #
exakta56 Loc: Orford,New Hampshire
 
A D300 is a much better camera and probably cheap to buy.

Reply
 
 
Mar 9, 2022 17:22:45   #
larryepage Loc: North Texas area
 
exakta56 wrote:
A D300 is a much better camera and probably cheap to buy.


You are correct. And I have and use one occasionally. But it doesn't have a CCD sensor, and it wasn't my first really useful digital camera.

Again...and I'll let Dan speak for himself...this isn't about money, and it's not about a better camera. It's about a D200. I have no doubt that 98% of people don't understand that. But it doesn't matter that they don't, and it doesn't change the fact that I wish I had my D200 back.

Reply
Mar 9, 2022 17:57:10   #
DirtFarmer Loc: Escaped from the NYC area, back to MA
 
We can't make the OP's decisions for him. Nor can we make larryepage's decisions for him. I enjoyed my D200 when I had it, but when I got a better camera, it got put on the shelf. I gave it to a kid who wanted to get into photography. I do not want it back. My choice. YMMV.

Reply
Mar 9, 2022 19:13:05   #
Old Dutch
 
larryepage wrote:
Discussions like this are always sad to me. A person asks for help in getting an old camera fixed is told to "forget it and get something newer," usually by people who have never seen one of the cameras in question. Dan clearly tells us that he already has something newer...a D500 and a D750, but that he would like to get his D200 fixed.

I made the mistake of giving my D200 away and would really like to have it back, even though I am fortunate to have several newer cameras. I paid very little to buy a replacement, but the flash system (internal and external) doesn't work. I'm sure that someone connected an incpatible flash to it and caused damage on both the main and flash circuit boards.

I see that Rick has contacted Dan and hope that they are able to get Dan's camera working again.
Discussions like this are always sad to me. A pers... (show quote)


Agreed. People have their own reasons for wanting to keep a particular item for use. I have an ancient Fuji HX20 ,that works ONLY in any auto mode; no adjustments are possible. But I keep it and use it because it does a few things in particular particularly well. This gentleman is not asking me to spend money on his D200, so God bless him. Of course, I still own and use an F4 AND a D300, so my judgement is probably suspect. Midwest Camera is a good outfit, knowing nothing is cheap anymore. And if this Rick fella is willing to help out, well God bless him too.

Reply
Mar 10, 2022 04:42:18   #
BlackRipleyDog
 
DAN Phillips wrote:
It's like the shutter is sticking, Nikon can't help me. I know it's old, but it has always been a goodie! Any suggestions?


There is nothing wrong in appreciating vintage equipment. I still run a Sansui receiver I bought new in 1979. I also owned a D200 at one time, but it developed hot pixels which became apparent doing long-exposure night shots; and that gave me the justification to move into full-frame.
That being said, if Dan likes the design and output esthetics of the D200, then more power to him.
I am looking at an Ebay listing right now for a Mint- body with 9000 clicks for $181 including shipping from a USA seller. At this point, the economics are superfluous. And that this model was just below Nikon's flagship model of the time.
In the grand scheme, age alone hurts the perceived value a lot less than the level of use or abuse.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 2
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.