frjeff wrote:
I recently posted my desire to move from a crop sensor and bridge camera to a reasonably priced FX model. My post asked for help from fellow UHH’s as to models that were decent and would stay within my modest budget.
I had four pages of responses. All helpful and many highly and strongly varied.
Then I received a response wherein the UHH asked me to PM him. And I did so. He replied that he would be sending me a Nikon D700 no longer needed as he had more advanced bodies as well as a mirrorless. All he asked for was my address.
I was blown away and gushed my thanks!
Many had suggested that I save up additional funds and bump up to a D610, D750, etc. so that was my plan. However this generous gentleman has now allowed me to learn with a still sound body at no expense. I will buy a used lens and begin honing my skills. If I decide to move on to a later model FX, I shall pay forward this D700 and my FZ1000 bridge camera.
It is highly refreshing and heart lifting (in this time of such great divisiveness) to be a part of such a helpful and generous group of folks.
I have kept this donor’s identity to myself as I am thinking that would be his desire.
Kudos to all of you!
I recently posted my desire to move from a crop se... (
show quote)
The D700 is still an excellent unit... that I still use regularly... so excellent in fact that a
D610 would be a step backward imho as the D700 is a seriously robust unit with great,
smooth, positive controls.
A 1986 E class Merc versus a 1991 Hyundai is a fair metaphor.
If your budget is really tight a Nikkor 50mm 1.8 AF-D or 50mm 1.4 AF-D.
Both have very good build quality and sharp optics and can be had for
substancially less than $100.
They were actually designed for film cameras, so when used on
digital Nikons there can be an artifact that looks
like a slight violet cast around the centre of the image
if there is a large amount of intense light reflecting
of a white wall or silver directly into the lens. It can happen
also if you are shooting objects on a "light table"
at some angles. I've struck the syndrome about 4 times
out of thousands of frames with my 50mm f/1.4 AF-D.
If the possibility of that violet artifact is a deal breaker for you
the AF-S G versions of those lenses are made specifically
for Nikons digital units would be right up your ally at a higher cost but
still relatively inexpensive... they don't have the build quality
or the on lens aperture control of the earlier units though.
Shots taken with my D700 and 50mm f1.4 AF-D
I've processed the image of the Maserati 101 different ways
and they all look good.